Improving the organization of housing and communal services management using the example of Podolsk M.o. Increasing the efficiency of providing housing and utility services

Relevance. The topic of the work is determined by the need to study and implement a set of necessary measures, improve organizational and economic mechanisms for providing Russians with high-quality and affordable housing and communal services.

The main reasons for the current situation are: low quality and inaccessibility (both in kind and in price terms) of the provided housing and communal services; poorly maintained housing stock; extremely high level of wear and tear of fixed assets, underdeveloped technologies, low energy efficiency; accidents and man-made disasters; shortage of funds and qualified personnel, massive bankruptcy of enterprises producing services, inflated and unaffordable tariffs, ineffective management of the industry.

The need to address the listed problems, as well as the tide of revolution in the economy, in the social field, in the housing and communal services of the Russian Federation, assigned a topic, main directions, scientific innovation, practical significance and goals of the work.

Purpose is to justify the adoption of a set of necessary measures to provide Russians with high-quality and affordable housing and communal services, and to formulate proposals for the development of organizational and economic mechanisms for the implementation of these measures.

Discussions of modern conceptual apparatus, scientific definitions leading terms have important methodological significance. To date, the concepts of housing and communal services are mentioned in 3.5 thousand regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation, of which 150 are federal laws, about 400 are regulatory legal acts affecting the quality and availability of these services. Based on a study of consumer demand and the effectiveness of the organizational and economic activities of service providers, as well as a comparative analysis of Russian and foreign acts.

According to the author's definition, the quality of housing and communal services is a set of characteristics, including usefulness, reliability, safety and stability, that determine the ability of these services to satisfy the established (regulatory) or personal needs of users. The novelty is the addition of the generally accepted concept to the subjective demand of buyers for the established characteristics of services, as well as the criteria of their usefulness, reliability, safety and stability.

The acceptability of housing and communal services is revealed as the real or potential prospect of consumers to use housing and communal services of an established “standard quality” or based on their individual demand, taking into account the established parameters and characteristics of a radical service.

Also, the definition of the quality of housing services has its own peculiarity: the quality of housing services is the generalization of the properties and characteristics of the activities for servicing residential buildings and territories of households. IN general view quality of service - a set of process characteristics and reasons for service that ensure the satisfaction of established or expected user needs.

The concept of accessibility of housing and communal services is supplemented by the possibility for citizens to purchase comfortable housing, and for low-mobility groups of the population (MPG) the opportunity to use necessary services, regulatory requirements for ensuring the accessibility and safety of which must be formalized by law.

In the process of research, definitions of other fundamental concepts were formulated Russian system housing and communal services, which have already entered scientific circulation. Scientific definitions are given to the basic concepts: “housing and communal services”, “quality”, “availability”, “quality of service”, “quality of housing services”, “quality of service”, “availability of services”, “housing affordability coefficient”, “livability of housing”, “life support”, “emergency fund”, “accident classifier”, etc.

In order to streamline the conceptual apparatus, the work has compiled a corresponding list of advanced legislative and regulatory legal acts, and also provides the main methodological interpretations to the list of the main economic characteristics of the Russian housing and communal services system.

The study shows that in society, in management devices, on the one hand, there is a misunderstanding of a number of established normative legal acts, on the other hand, contradictions have emerged in the definition of primary concepts in the sphere of housing and communal services. Such uncertainty prevents the effective implementation of constructive activities in the provision of housing and communal services. Therefore, the agency exercising control in a certain area (the Ministry of Regional Development of Russia) is recommended to intensively enter the Government of the Russian Federation with a proposal to prepare a suitable bill.

Based on the study, it was concluded that it is necessary to adopt and implement a set of necessary measures to increase the accessibility and quality of provided housing and communal services:

1.Improving industry regulation.

2. Development of competition, market relations and management apparatuses.

3.Improved performance state participation in implementing measures to develop the housing and communal services sector, providing the population with affordable and comfortable housing, especially in small towns.

4. Creation of a modern system of training and retraining of employees in the field of housing and communal services, improving their skills. Development of professional standards.

5.Improved quality living conditions citizens.

6.Improving energy efficiency and resource conservation when
production, provision and consumption of housing and communal services.

7. Modernization of tariff policy.

8. Formation of “social factors”.

9. Improving the regulatory legal framework for the functioning of the housing and communal services complex.

10. Carrying out a complete inventory of all objects of the housing and communal services complex and indicating their market value.

Based on the mentioned urgent measures and priority directions, organizational and economic guidelines and tools for accelerating the practical implementation of measures to reform and modernize the housing and communal services sector have been identified. Among these objectives: the development, with the participation of representatives of civil society, of a new Comprehensive Industry Development Project; adoption of the “road map for housing and communal services”: step-by-step plans and network schedules for the implementation of the mentioned Comprehensive Project, Decree, State Program and Federal Target Program, defining the management and financing system in the new conditions, volumes and sources of financing, incl. “preferential loans” and aspects of the effectiveness of measures; preparation of regional complexes of urgent enterprises to provide the population of Russia with accessible and first-class services, affordable social, rental, non-commercial housing; identification and establishment of the most important sources of financing programs and measures to improve the quality of regional housing and communal services systems, including from the state budget, budgets of constituent entities of the Russian Federation, extra-budgetary funds, business funds, as well as funds from the population; implementation of market mechanisms of management and competition in the industry, support for development social partnership, “social factors”; for the development of market relations and competition, it is extremely important to create equal conditions for all market representatives; implementation of energy and resource saving measures, installation of house and intra-apartment service meters, new approaches to improving tariff policy; updating the legislative and regulatory framework governing relations in the production, equipment and consumption of housing and communal services in modern conditions, bringing it into line with the goals of transformation and improving the quality of the housing and communal services sector, etc.

The implementation of the above combination of urgent measures and priority organizational and economic mechanisms can lead to achieving the goal: providing Russians with high-quality and affordable housing and communal services in the medium term (Fig. 1).

The need has been established as a matter of priority to obtain a new system of training and retraining of engineering, technical and working personnel with the development of new high-quality standards, and the organization of social partnership in the industry. One of the most important conditions for improving the quality and availability of services is staffing the functioning and development of housing and communal services, ensuring the competitiveness of labor in this area. The study shows that the shortage of professional personnel was 22% in 1986, and 60% in 2012; their level of professional training was 5.9% and 7%, respectively. Average monthly wage workers in recent years, as a rule, are two times less than the average for Russia, which makes it impossible to attract qualified personnel, increases the number of accidents in the life support systems of the population, and gives rise to social protest among workers.

Rice. 1. Model for improving the quality of housing and communal services.

The basic rate for a first-class worker is 60-70% of the regional subsistence minimum. In order to solve the problems of professional support for the industry, the work considered measures to create a personnel training system, improve social and labor relations in the industry as the most important social factor reforms of the housing and communal services sector.

CONCLUSION: Housing and communal services provided to the population in the Russian Federation, their quality and accessibility are considered. The concepts of quality and accessibility of housing and communal services have been updated and expanded. The main reasons for the unsatisfactory provision of housing and communal services to the population have been identified: ineffective management and insufficient governmental support industry, ill-conceived privatization and decentralization of the housing and communal services sector, lack of competition, limited volumes of construction of social housing, dilapidated and poorly maintained housing stock, extreme deterioration of fixed assets, shortage of qualified personnel and financial resources, expensive technologies and inflated tariffs, low quality of services provided.

The quality of housing and communal services is one of the most pressing problems in the housing and communal services sector. Despite the regular rise in prices, it leaves much to be desired, remaining at the same, rather low, level. Today, many methods have been developed to assess the quality of the services provided to us. We will talk about some of them in this article.

Types and quality of housing and communal services

Owners of housing in an apartment building in most cases are supported by housing and communal services. Although today, owners are increasingly turning to management companies or contractors and organizing an HOA to manage the building.

Housing services - activities related to the operation of the house, aimed at maintaining a condition that is safe for living and increasing the comfort of residents. Housing and communal services payments are calculated based on the square footage of each owner’s apartment.

Owners are often confident that prices for the provision of housing and communal services are tariff-based and subject to regulation. But that's not true. The cost of the service is set and approved at general meeting residents of apartment buildings. Quite often, homeowners associations or management companies try to convince owners that the proposed tariffs are reasonable.

In houses where the form of management has not been chosen, prices for housing and communal services have not been approved, or those belonging to the social category, the cost of maintenance and repairs is set by local authorities.

Public utilities - This is a type of service that cannot be complete unless monopolistic enterprises supplying natural and energy resources (water, electricity, gas) participate in it. Tariffs for their payment are set by authorities and can be calculated according to the number of residents or according to meter readings. Responsibility for the supply and quality of housing and communal services falls on management companies or HOAs. According to modern Russian legislation, implementing organizations are required to maintain the engineering systems of the house, which are the common property of the residents. If this does not happen or the security is provided at a low level, then the company or partnership must recalculate payments.

Neither management organizations nor associations of homeowners have the right to set markups on supplied resources, since the responsibilities of supplying companies include their delivery. This is done through work related to the maintenance and repair of the house.

The boundary of responsibility is the point that separates the engineering of the house being serviced and the enterprise supplying the resources (usually the wall of the apartment building).

• Public utilities

1. Cold water supply (CWS) - The water supplied to apartments must be safe for consumption, that is, the presence in it of microorganisms that threaten human health, causing hepatitis, cholera or dysentery, is unacceptable; the water cannot contain harmful chemical elements, such as heavy metals or arsenic. Cold water supply must be carried out uninterruptedly. However, the rules provide for stopping the water supply for up to 24 hours in the event of an accident on the main line or a one-time break in the cold water supply for no more than 4 hours (up to eight hours per month) in the case of preventive or repair work.
2. Sewerage (water disposal) - The wastewater collection service must be uninterrupted. Provided by the same organization that provides cold water.
3. Hot water supply (DHW) - The rules for supplying hot water are similar to those for cold water supply. In the conditions of hot water supply, there are some clarifications that were made at the state level and relate to the temperature regime. The water should not be colder than 40 °C (in this case it is paid as cold) and hotter than 75 °C.
4. Heat supply - the quality of housing and communal services is considered good if the air in residential premises is heated above +18 °C, and in corner rooms above +20 °C, the temperature in the entrances should not fall below +15 °C.

Heat supply rules allow for its temporary shutdown:

• up to 16 hours, if the air in the living room is warmed up by 12–18 °C;
• up to 8 hours if the air temperature is within 10–12 C°;
• up to 4 hours if the air temperature ranges from 8 to 10 °C.

1. Gas supply may be interrupted for no more than 4 hours monthly.
2. Electricity supply. The quality of housing and communal services can be considered good if there are no voltage drops when supplying electricity. Stopping the electricity supply is permitted and can be up to two hours per month (if two power sources are installed) and no more than 24 hours per month (one source).

• Housing services

1. Housing maintenance and repair- the most popular housing service, included in the list of public utilities and aimed at ensuring the condition of an apartment building suitable for safe use.
2. Garbage removal (solid waste) - a service that must be included in the list of housing and communal services, just like elevator maintenance. The law stipulates that charges for payment for this work are carried out taking into account the size of the apartment. This approach to resolving the issue causes a lot of outrage, because the amount of garbage is affected not by the size of the room, but by the number of people living in it. Therefore, many agree that payment for waste removal should be calculated on the same principle as for utilities, that is, according to consumption standards.
3. - one of the most expensive services that can be provided at the discretion of apartment building residents. Naturally, there are standards that establish the frequency of such work (as a rule, this period is about 25 years). But today the quality of housing and communal services is at such a level that many houses have not undergone major repairs for 50 years or more.
4. Maintenance - a service aimed at eliminating minor faults, but does not involve major work. Current repairs do not include: eliminating the consequences of housing and communal services accidents (as well as the accidents themselves) and preparing apartment buildings for the heating season.

Current repairs are carried out based on the decision of the general meeting of residents of the high-rise building. The frequency of implementation is regulated by law and depends on the type of house. On average, such a service should be provided every 3–5 years. As a rule, during the work, entrances are repaired, including replacing doors, courtyards of buildings are landscaped, intercoms are installed, etc.

1. Other housing services. This type of housing and communal services includes: cleaning and renovation of apartments, organizing security of the entrance or the house as a whole, delivery of purchases, etc. In Russia, such a service is practiced in business-class houses and in some elite new buildings. Judging by foreign experience, this type of service is in greatest demand in so-called apartment buildings, where residential premises are intended exclusively for rent. More recently, a similar type of activity began to be introduced in Russia.

This includes the concept of quality of housing and communal services

To correctly understand any term, it is necessary to solve the problem of its unambiguous interpretation. Documents at the international (ISO and IEC) and state levels (Rosstandart) define key concepts used in world practice, on the basis of which one can draw a conclusion about the level of a service or product. Let's get acquainted with the basic terms and provisions related to managing the quality characteristics of products sold (services/works).

Quality is a category that determines the social and economic basis for the development of society and a person as a member of this society. Experts and specialists interpret this definition differently because this concept is multifaceted. Some characterize quality as a property that fully meets the needs of the client, while others understand it as consistency with the requirements of customers.

Different understandings of this term are explained by the fact that it can be attributed to products that differ in their content, content and role in the life of the consumer. However, in each specific case, the requirements for the totality of product properties must meet a certain standard and be precisely formulated.

The quality of housing and communal services is a complex distinctive features activities aimed at and surrounding areas that meet the needs of residents.

This means that determining the level of services provided by management companies and other service organizations is based on the principle of taking into account the needs expressed by homeowners in apartment buildings. In addition, an indicator of the level of housing and communal services is the features of servicing tenants, managing the housing stock, the design and layout of courtyards and the houses themselves. Before finally assessing the quality of housing and communal services, it is necessary to take into account the following indicators:

• multidimensional quality;
• features of activity (for example, territorial);
• material base;
• social affiliation of consumers, etc.

What problems are associated with managing the quality of housing and communal services?

Usually, main characteristic The material and technical base of the housing and communal services consists of battered equipment, old buildings, houses and other structures and structures, worn-out communication networks. In addition, in the housing and communal services system there are not many specialists and managers who are highly professional. This results in a rather low level of service provided, which distinguishes the housing and communal services sector from other areas of life support. All this suggests that improving the quality of housing and communal services is simply necessary.

Housing and communal services is a state-regulated economic sector, maximally oriented towards society. Failure to comply with the proper level of service entails social tension and a decrease in trust in the state, its laws and executive institutions. Taking into account the above, we can conclude that the quality of housing and communal services is the main requirement for the work of all structures that provide life support to the population, and these are: state and local self-government bodies, regulatory and supervisory services.

In order to effectively solve the problem of the appropriate level of housing and communal services, government officials must first of all not ignore the organization of risk control, and in the field of housing and communal services they are as follows:

• operational management risks, which accompany the work of private operators every day;
• technical and technological threats that arise due to malfunction or the use of outdated and worn-out equipment, due to the unprofessional organization of the enterprise’s activities;
• economic risks, adversely affecting financial indicator work of private companies;
• social risks, that arise as a result of performing functions that have public importance: solving the problem of life support for citizens by providing the necessary resources and services;
• political threats arising due to the peculiarities of the construction of the system of state and municipal government that limit the activities of entrepreneurs through the involvement of executive bodies and legislative power;
• legal risks, resulting from imperfections legislative framework, which in some cases is fragmented and unprofessional.

For the consumer, it does not matter at all how the threats are overcome; he is only interested in the quality of housing and communal services that meets his needs. The level of service should not reflect the political and economic situations in the country or region, weather and climatic features and others external factors. Services must be delivered on time and without interruption.

All together - a poorly thought out regulatory framework, unprofessionalism of workers and managers in the housing and communal services sector, bureaucracy and corruption, combined with a lack of economic interest in innovation and improvement of ongoing activities and management of residential premises - leads to the formation of unreasonably high prices and gives rise to low quality of housing and communal services. services.

Today in Russia there is a situation where it is simply necessary to review the work of the entire housing and communal services system and reconstruct it. To solve this problem, certain financial investments are required both from the authorities and from representatives of business structures, and this, as a rule, simply does not exist, or the support provided is so meager that it is not able to change the situation. And, as a result, prices rise, and the quality of housing and communal services decreases; serious energy losses occur during the transportation of heat and hot water, which becomes the main indicator of the performance of the entire industry.

We can talk about the effectiveness of managing the appropriate level of provision of housing and communal services if the state and municipal authorities take responsibility for the social well-being of citizens. Whereas the formalism and unprofessionalism of the modern regulatory framework do not contribute to the worthy implementation of housing and communal services reform.

Today control and supervision over the housing and communal services sector is carried out by:

• state authorities supervising residential premises;
• Rospotrebnadzor (Federal Service for the Protection of Consumer Rights);
• Rostekhnadzor (Federal Service for Supervision of Ecology and Atom);
• FAS (Federal Antimonopoly Service);
• Ministry of Emergency Situations (fire inspection inspection under the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense and Emergency Situations);
• local government bodies;
• various public organizations.

Agree that there are more than enough control and supervisory structures, but in all this diversity the social component is absolutely invisible, and the importance of local government bodies is reduced to a minimum. Despite the fact that there are no changes in the regulatory framework for risk management, specific tasks aimed at increasing the efficiency of the housing and communal services sector and the provision of high-quality housing and communal services are not being solved, the degree of control and supervision by the administration is constantly increasing.

Grade– one of the key elements of the quality management system for housing and communal services. It is determined by conducting socio-economic monitoring. In the assessment, the leading role is given to the client, so with its help you can find out not only the state of affairs in the area of ​​servicing residents, but also prepare a good basis for further analysis. And this, in turn, will provide an opportunity, in addition to adopting effective management decisions to be a link between the government structure and the consumer. Feedback is the element that can contribute to the formation and development of any social security and service system.

The analysis allows us to conclude that in the methods that local authorities use to certify the quality of housing and communal services, the indicators are divorced from the transparency of connections organized between suppliers and consumers of services by management companies.

One of the important conditions systems for assessing the performance of management organizations is the result of their work. This is what owners and tenants of residential premises deal with when concluding a service agreement. Moreover, its parties evaluate performance indicators differently: the business organization looks at the quantity of services provided, and residents look at the quality.

The agreement between local authorities and management companies plays a role big role in the formation of a system for assessing the performance of organizations providing services. An indicator that allows us to determine the quality of housing and communal services can be called the following:

• timely information about the state of affairs at the facility to the owners of residential premises serviced under the contract;
• monitoring the quality of services provided;
• tracking important events that are an indicator of the activities of the management company;
• supervision of the work of the management company by adjusting indicators;
• monitoring compliance with the terms of the contract for the provision of resources, services and management of a residential property.

Today, the Rules for the provision of housing and communal services provide that their quality, when received by the customer, will comply with all existing standards and sanitary and hygienic norms, which must be specified. Moreover, it is not at all necessary to conclude a written agreement between the parties. The fact that an organization receives regular payment for the consumption of housing and communal services already indicates that contractual relations have been established and are in effect.

Considering that municipal authorities are the key shared owners of residential premises of apartment buildings (high-rise buildings are located on the territory entrusted to them), certain relationships are established between the city administration and service organizations. Therefore, the agreement between these structures can be equated to a collective agreement for the management of housing facilities.

There is a certain quality standard for housing and utilities, which should be the basis of the municipal Rules for the provision of housing and communal services. In addition to general rules, the regulations must provide mechanisms to help protect the interests of consumers. This information should become an annex to the contract for the provision of housing and communal services.

The Government of the Russian Federation submitted to the State Duma a draft Law “On Amendments to the Housing Code of the Russian Federation”; in addition, normative acts were proposed for consideration by deputies on recognizing certain provisions as irrelevant and no longer in force (“On state regulation of activities related to the management of apartment buildings”). However, the project does not provide for licensing of housekeeping work, but only the right to manage an apartment building. Which, naturally, does not cause much delight among residents and tenants of residential premises.

The draft Law does not take into account the social foundations that can ensure a decent quality of housing and communal services. Local governments play a very minor role in organizing the leadership process, as do residents of apartment buildings. The adoption of the bill is not able to relieve the housing and communal services sector from risks and problems; it is possible that dissatisfaction with the discrepancy between the price and level of service will grow and lead to another surge of indignation. We can only hope that improving the quality of housing and communal services is not a problem that the Government of our country is unable to solve.

How can you assess the quality of housing and communal services?

After analyzing approaches to determining the quality indicator for the provision of housing and communal services, the shortcomings of the existing system were identified. This served as the basis for the creation of a new, more effective assessment methodology.

The quality of housing and communal services is the starting point of this method. It was already said above that in this case, quality means the degree of consumer satisfaction, and this is precisely what needs to be characterized. Using sociological methods, such as surveys and questionnaires. But, unfortunately, housing and communal services are not an area that would attract the attention of sociologists; there is no close relationship between supplier and consumer. The only source that can provide any information about the level of services provided are, in most cases, complaints from residents, the number of which can be used to judge the activities of a particular company. The better an organization works, the fewer complaints it has.

Initially, one may get the impression that this approach cannot provide an objective assessment due to the existing differentiation of consumers, which has a different impact on quality claims: one should not expect similar attitudes towards equally provided services among representatives of different social groups. In other words, the management company may receive complaints due to the fact that the enterprise did not meet the aspirations of the residents. But if you more carefully analyze the expectations of consumers, the ratio of satisfied and dissatisfied will approach indicators close to the normal distribution (with a large number of customers).

Ensuring the comparability of different housing and communal services in terms of the scale of provision of housing and communal services - This is the next stage of work provided for by this methodology, because producers of housing and communal services differ in the number of clients covered. In this case, the level of service is determined not by the number of complaints (absolute value), but by indicators (relative value): the number of complaints and the number of consumers are compared. Officially received statements from residents to emergency services, the media (newspapers, radio, TV), management companies and other similar organizations should be considered as complaints. The reason for applying may be various types of malfunctions, frequent interruptions in the supply of electricity, water, gas, poor quality provision of housing and communal services by service companies, etc. It is not difficult to determine the number of applications. To do this, it is enough to contact the dispatch service, which operates around the clock, or the management company (complaints and appeals from consumers are recorded in a log).

This indicator is usually called the complaint rate, and it is calculated using the formula:

Here: ZH O – complaint rate, K POTR – number of service consumers, K ZHA – number of complaints for a certain period (month, quarter, year).

The result shows how many consumers there are per complaint received. It is desirable that the indicator be maximized, in other words, that the denominator (K JA) be as small as possible (this will indicate the good performance of the service enterprise). It is customary to consider the number of complaints per year so that the value of housing and communal services that provide services can be used different types. For example, the number of complaints about the operation of a heating plant and water disposal will vary greatly. In addition, this approach will help determine the seasonality of requests, since the time of year is of great importance for the number of complaints for various services (in the summer they will not complain about poor heat supply).

The quality of housing and communal services very much depends on the housing and communal services fund and consumers, and they can differ significantly. For example, one company provides service in new buildings (new stock), and another - in old houses (dilapidated stock). Naturally, in the second case, the number of accidents will be greater, consumers of these buildings will make claims more often, and the company’s profit will be less. Therefore, it is advisable to supplement the complaint response indicator with KV (leveling coefficient), which will take into account the degree of wear and tear of service facilities.

Today, sources of information about the technical condition of equipment and deterioration of housing facilities are technical inventory documents, which are carried out in relation to each building (an inventory card is filled out, which indicates the percentage of depreciation). Considering that housing and communal enterprises serve consumers living in buildings with varying degrees of wear and tear, to determine the quality of housing and communal services it is necessary to take average data on the size of houses and their level of depreciation:

Here: I ZhF – depreciation of the housing stock, I i – depreciation of a specific object, d i – share of the housing fund object.

The so-called increasing scale is used as an equalization coefficient:

As a result: the quality of housing and communal services can be determined using the adjusted complaint response rate:

Unfortunately, even this value is not able to provide comprehensive information, but it has the great advantage that it is applicable to all types of housing and communal services and the size of service enterprises and, most importantly, it always works.

Mutual agreement on the quality of provided housing and communal services and their prices - the next stage of the technique. Naturally, the minimum possible prices are implied: a lower amount suits the consumer better. But low tariffs can negatively affect the quality of housing and communal services. To avoid such influence, when determining the complaint response rate, you need to use an integrated approach (i.e., together with the cost of the service).

For analysis, all types of services can be divided into 3 categories:

1. depend on the size of the facility (maintenance and repair of residential premises);
2. depend on air temperature (heat supply);
3. depend on the number of residents (the rest are servants).

The consumer needs to compare the tariffs that exist for the same type of service and give preference to the supplier who offers the lowest under the same conditions for supplying the resource or service. Usually the cost is reflected in these conditions, and most often the high price is justified by decent quality. Therefore, the consumer needs to consider the relationship between the tariff and the level of service. It is beneficial for the client if the numerator is minimal and the denominator is maximum:

Considering that the analysis of the quality of housing and communal services is carried out according to the methodology described above (formula 3), the price-quality ratio can be obtained using formula 5:

The “price” indicator is calculated differently in accordance with the categories of housing and communal services, which were named a little higher:

1) average cost per 1 m2, if it depends on the size of the object;

2) average cost per 1 Gcal, if it depends on air temperature;

3) average cost per person, if it depends on the number of residents.

The “price” used in this formula is the average tariff indicator for a specific service, which means we have a final version of calculating the “price-quality” indicator:

To fully understand the last formula, it is worth commenting on some of its meanings: the larger the final value, the higher the quality of housing and communal services. The calculation results can provide interested parties with comprehensive information about the level of work of management companies and other enterprises in this field.

Improving the quality of housing and communal services using the Japanese method

The management company faces two main tasks.

1. Determine customer requirements.
2. Meet expectations by organizing work correctly.

QFD (Quality Function Deployment) is one of the ways to materialize consumer requirements and expectations. QFD is a Japanese method whose purpose is to provide quality assurance at all stages of product or service development (starting from the creation stage).

The method is based on the construction of a matrix called the “House of Quality”. Within the “House”, data regarding the quality of the service and decisions to improve it are recorded.

The matrix is ​​divided into parts:

• on the left are consumer expectations;
• on the right is data in comparison with ideal quality indicators;
• in the center there is a table indicating the technical characteristics of services (columns) and consumer requirements (rows);
• the upper part (roof of the house) contains information about the relationship between technical characteristics;
• the lower part (basement) is intended to analyze the technical characteristics of competing companies and evaluate them.

The use of QFD methodology opens up the following opportunities that affect the quality of housing and communal services:

• establishing a connection between consumer expectations and the technical potential necessary to achieve the required quality level;
• defining relationships within a service (i.e. between parameters and components);
• transformation of the properties of the provision process into characteristics of equipment and methods of control.

The purpose of the QFD methodology: to determine the potential that can be used to improve the quality of housing and communal services.

The QFD methodology involves six stages of work. To make it clearer, we will turn to the experience of the activities of UZhF Vostochnaya LLC (a management company registered in Orenburg).

Stage 1. Determining consumer expectations.

The first stage is intended to find out consumer expectations regarding the quality of housing and communal services, for which a survey method is used. The questionnaire is called “Quality of housing and communal services” and its main question is formulated as follows: “What assessment do you give...”:

1. condition of the house area (cleanliness);
2. condition of entrances (cleanliness);
3. the condition of objects located in the yard (benches, children's playgrounds, trash cans, etc.);
4. carrying out routine repairs of common property (roofing, basements, communication systems, etc.);
5. quality of cold water supply;
6. quality of heat supply;
7. the state of lighting of the local area;
8. state of entrance lighting;
9. prompt response to applications and requests from apartment owners;
10. prompt elimination of accidents and their consequences;
11. the culture of behavior and communication between housing and communal services employees and residents of a high-rise building;
12. solid waste (garbage) removal service;
13. tariffs (in accordance with the quality of the service provided);
14. activities of the management company.

345 respondents took part in the survey, which made it possible to establish the types of services that are of the greatest importance to consumers:

• clean courtyards and entrances (sanitary and hygienic condition);
• playgrounds and sports grounds (clean and well-maintained);
• high-quality housing and communal services;
• high-quality ongoing repairs of common property in required deadlines;
• timely removal of waste and cleanliness of the area designated for its collection;
• prompt response of emergency services.

These services are included in the “House of Quality” matrix (left side).

Stage 2. Determining the comparative value of services

The second stage is intended to compare the quality of housing and communal services of your company with the level of competitors (one or more). This will give you the opportunity to evaluate your work and understand whether your service is better or worse than its analogues. To do this, you can use the “Expert Assessment” method. Analyze your service and compare it with its ideal option (it is better to use a 5-point rating scale).

For LLC UZhF "Vostochnaya", you can take the activities of LLC UKZhF "Central" as an example to follow. This organization became the winner of the “Best Management Company” competition, which was held in Orenburg in 2012. The calculations were entered, again, into the “House of Quality” matrix (right side).

The results of the work carried out showed that the condition and improvement of children's and sports grounds, solid waste removal and routine repairs do not correspond to the ideal. This, in turn, identified potential opportunities for improving the quality of housing and communal services.

Stage 3. Setting target values

In the third stage, project goals are established. To do this, determine the values ​​(in digital equivalent) of consumer requirements for each service. If its characteristics correspond to the expected ones, target values ​​are set equal to the current state of affairs (with available digital expressions). In relation to the example under consideration, the following justified expectations can be noted:

• quality of public services;
• emergency service activities;
• removal of solid waste.

These expectations were rated 5, 5, and 4 (respectively). They will remain unchanged.

Services such as sanitary and hygienic conditions, improvement of children's and sports grounds, had, respectively, ratings: 4, 4 and 3. Which turned out to be lower than that of the company taken as an example. Therefore, improving the quality of housing and communal services should be carried out in such a way as to increase the scores to 5 (in all areas). Having certain target values, you can calculate the relative values ​​of the degree of increase in the quality indicator using the formula:

degree of improvement = target value/service rating.

Stage 4. Description of technical characteristics of services

At this stage, we developed a solution: by changing certain characteristics of services, we can satisfy some of the expectations of clients (consumers). We have established: “HOW to do it” and “WHAT to do.” In other words, we were able to answer the question: how do technical characteristics relate to consumer expectations? Based on the example under consideration, we established 18 technical parameters that determine the quality of housing and communal services. We placed them in the center of the “House of Quality” matrix in the form of a table.

Choice correct values table determines the success of the entire project. Many technical characteristics are regulated by the state. For example, the following documents.

• Resolution of the State Committee of the Russian Federation for Construction and Housing and Communal Services No. 170 dated September 27, 2003 “On approval of the Rules and Standards for the operation of the housing stock.” The Rules indicate the frequency with which cleaning of the local area and common areas (for example, entrances) should be carried out, the start time of janitors, the time frame for eliminating the accident and its consequences, the annual number of inspections of the housing stock and territory, the schedule for repairs and inspections of small architectural objects (benches, platforms, trash cans, etc.).
• The Housing Code of the Russian Federation determines the frequency of holding general meetings of apartment building residents.
• Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 354 “On the provision of services to owners and tenants of premises in apartment buildings” establishes standards for pressure and temperature conditions of water, as well as the standard air temperature in the apartment.

At a general meeting of residents of an apartment building, a decision can be made on the frequency of renovation and installation of small architectural forms.

Stage 5. Determining the relationships between the technical characteristics of services

The relationship matrix helped establish the relationship between consumer expectations and technical characteristics. The strength of this correlation is reflected in the roof of the House of Quality (top of the matrix).

The “House” base (bottom of the matrix) contains the following information:

1st line: units of measurement of technical characteristics;

2nd line: the digital value of our technical characteristics of the service;

3rd line: digital value of the technical characteristics of the reference service.

Having received some data, we move on to determining the target values ​​​​of technical characteristics. The calculation is carried out taking into account the priority of types of service. The results obtained are used to improve the quality of housing and communal services, which the company’s managers are working on.

So, the use of the QFD technique helped determine the priority of the company’s following works:

• frequency of routine repairs of public facilities;
• sanitary and hygienic condition of the local area;
• frequency of solid waste removal.

Thanks to the research, we were able to improve the quality of housing and communal services, guided by the recommendations developed.

1. Considering that the sanitary and hygienic condition of the local area does not meet the expectations of consumers and does not meet the standard, it is necessary to concentrate attention on this area of ​​activity. To do this, you need to organize the cleaning of courtyards and entrances every day, set a different work schedule for the janitors (start the shift 2 hours earlier), and sign an Acceptance Certificate for the completed work from the person in charge of the house. These events will contribute to the formation of a loyal attitude towards the company’s activities and, most importantly, will improve the quality of housing and communal services.
2. We decided to begin the work on improving children's and sports grounds by adjusting the repair schedule for small architectural objects, because this is one of the most important indicators of the safety of their operation. To do this, we decided to conduct weekly inspections of the sites and, if necessary, make changes to their restoration plan.
3. It was decided to begin the service of carrying out high-quality routine repairs by revising the schedule for its implementation. As a result, we drew up a plan for 5 years (instead of one year, as was originally the case). Control of the work was entrusted to the chief engineer of the management company and the residents of the house. Naturally, this plan must be agreed upon with consumers and reviewed at annual meetings in order to adjust and check the implementation of activities. The provision of this service is associated with certain material investments, which often leads to a discrepancy between the needs of residents and the plans of the management company. Satisfying this desire is possible if you change the number of PPRs (carry out one instead of two). This will save money, which will then be used to provide this service.
4. Timely removal of solid waste can be organized by changing the frequency. In this case, the following indicators must be taken into account: the number of storeys of the building, the number of entrances and the number of residents, the presence of retail outlets on the territory of the building (or nearby). Garbage containers must be emptied at least 2 times a day (14 operations per week). To resolve this issue, an appropriate agreement is drawn up with the contractor involved in the removal of bulky waste and household waste. It must indicate the frequency of this work. In this case, the quality of housing and communal services can be positively influenced by a system of fines for violating the removal schedule.

So, the use of QFD methodology can improve the level of housing and utility services by focusing on the characteristics of work that are a priority for both the consumer and the management company.

Kirsanov S.A. – Ph.D., President of the ANO “Institute municipal development", Head of Department, State Medical University SPbIGO

Housing and communal services

Housing and communal services are the most important component of the life support system of the population and achieving the appropriate quality of service provision is the most important goal of the functioning of an organization that is part of the housing and communal services system. Achieving the quality of provision of housing and communal services must be combined with optimizing the costs of their provision.

An effective quality system for housing and communal services must satisfy the needs and expectations of the consumer and protect the interests of the service provider (performer). Providing a quality service should be profitable and help reduce risks associated with the health and safety of people, penalties for unsatisfactory quality of service, loss of reputation and

Quality of housing and communal services

The concept of “quality of housing and communal services” , which is the main criterion for managing housing and communal services facilities and arises when purchase and sale services, an effective combination of entrepreneurial activity with the achievement of the necessary social standards for the livelihoods and livelihoods of the population is laid down.

Quality of housing and communal services - this is a set of characteristics of housing and utility services that provide the required (normative) needs of the subscriber. Therefore, quality control of housing and communal services is, first of all, control of the characteristics of housing and utility services. The control process itself includes two stages: measurement and analysis. The measurement does not have to be instrumental; sometimes expert opinion is sufficient. The analysis should be carried out in comparison with the standard values ​​of the characteristics of housing and communal services.

PROBLEMS AFFECTING THE QUALITY OF HOUSING SERVICES

Ineffective management system

Underdevelopment of competition in housing and communal services

Lack of full-fledged contractual relations

Lack of control over the quality of housing and communal services

Information support for the provision of housing and communal services

Insufficient use of civil mechanisms of liability for the quality of housing and communal services

Management efficiency in the housing and communal services sector: groups of regions

Depending on the chosen approaches to management in the housing and communal services sector, Russian regions are divided into 4 groups:

most progressive– housing and communal services reforms are progressing successfully and the situation in the industry is improving;

progressive group– housing and communal services reforms are being carried out, but not in full: measures of social support (benefits) are not fully translated into monetary form;

stagnant group– the financial condition of the housing and communal services industry is improving, but due to an increase in subsidies from regional budgets for housing and communal services enterprises;

depressed group– the process of reforming the housing and communal services has not been launched, the financial condition of the industry is deteriorating, including with a simultaneous reduction in budget subsidies

The effectiveness of providing housing and communal services depends on management methods

apartment buildings Share of apartment buildings whose owners have chosen and implemented management of HOAs or residential complexes, %

The process of introducing modern methods of managing apartment buildings is slow:

share of apartment buildings, in

of which the method of managing HOAs and residential complexes was chosen, increased insignificantly over the year and amounted to 2.4%;

share of apartment buildings,

served by management organizations – 20.9%

The weak dynamics of indicators indicates a lack of due attention from regional authorities

The domestic housing and communal services sector has not yet reached the proper level even in the most well-developed territories

Population dissatisfaction with the quality and cost of provided housing and communal services is increasingly aggravating the problem of finding ways out of the current situation in regions and municipalities.

An analysis of indicators for the implementation of the housing and communal services reform used in the statistical reporting of Rosstat, contained in the Federal Target Program “Housing” for 2002-2010, the Concept of Housing and Communal Services Reform and the federal law “On the Fund for Assistance to the Reform of Housing and Communal Services” showed that a unified system of indicators for assessing the implementation of the housing and communal services reform has not developed, and the parameters of the effectiveness of industry reform are not considered at the official level.

It is necessary to create a set of indicators of the effectiveness of reforming the housing and utilities sector, including the targeting of housing subsidies, criteria for the social and economic efficiency of tariff policy, as well as the level of competition in the utility market and in the management of apartment buildings.

Analysis of expenditures on housing and communal services of households in Russia and the USA

The share of expenses for utility bills in Russia (6.9%) is currently at the level of the United States; expenses for housing of an American family (19.0%) are more than an order of magnitude higher than the same figure for the average Russian household (1.4 %). The established ratios indicate differences in priorities: housing or utilities.

In Russia, the relevance of public services is in the foreground, and housing with low consumer properties, which most citizens received as a result of free privatization, is taken for granted.

In the United States, on the contrary, high-quality, comfortable housing comes first, as a fundamental asset of the family and a guarantee of social stability, and utilities are just a necessary annex to it. The presence of public services in the absence of housing loses its meaning.

In Russian society, a revision of the social value system in the housing sector is necessary, when living in comfortable housing should become the object of close attention!

Significant threats to the quality of housing and utility services

1. Administrative (regulatory) barriers.

Lack of a mechanism for implementing coordinated actions of government authorities in pricing, legislative and tax activities leads to the fact that in existing regulatory documents measures related to economic incentives and

responsibility for ineffective provision of housing and communal services.

Significant threats to the quality of housing and utility services

2. Lack of qualified personnel, lack of knowledge and experience among housing and communal services specialists.

3. Failure of the budget to fulfill its obligations and lack of effective and transparent procedures for the formation and change of tariffs

Larin S.N.
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Leading Researcher
Federal State Budgetary Institution Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Larin S.N.
PhD in Engineering, Leading Researcher
FGBUS Central Economical and Mathematical Institute RAS, Moscow

Annotation: The main goal of this article is to substantiate the choice of methodological tools for assessing the quality of housing and communal services, taking into account the influence of innovative mechanisms of interaction between economic entities of housing and communal services on the assessment. The object of this study is the activities of economic entities in the sphere of housing and communal services to provide housing and communal services to owners and tenants of appropriate quality, and the subject of the study is the quality indicators of housing and communal services and the choice of methodological tools for their assessment. The article reveals the definition of the economic category of the quality of housing and communal services, presents a new methodological approach to measuring and tools for assessing the quality of housing and communal services, taking into account the degree of satisfaction of home owners and tenants with the quality of the provided housing and communal services.

Abstract: The main purpose of this article is to substantiate the choice of methodological tools for assessing the quality of housing and communal services, taking into account the impact of innovative mechanisms of interaction of economic entities of housing and communal services on the assessment. The object of this study is the activity of economic entities in the sphere of housing and communal services in providing housing and communal services of proper quality to owners and tenants of housing, and the quality of housing and communal services and the choice of methodological tools for their evaluation are determined by the subject of the study. The article reveals the definition of the economic category of the quality of housing and communal services, presents a new methodical approach to measurement and tools for assessing the quality of housing and communal services, taking into account the degree of satisfaction of owners and tenants of housing with the quality of provided housing and communal services.

Keywords: housing and communal services, subjects, interaction, innovative mechanisms, methodological tools, quality assessment, services.

Keywords: housing and communal services, subjects, interaction, innovative mechanisms, methodological tools, quality assessment, services.

Acknowledgments

The article was prepared with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. 17-02-50004a(f) “Innovative technologies, mechanisms, models and tools for resource saving and improving the quality of housing and communal services as the basis for a comprehensive modernization of the housing and communal services sector.”

Introduction

Improving the quality of housing and communal services (HCS) today is one of the most important problems associated with ensuring the effective operation of the existing housing stock, which is the object of management in the housing and communal services sector. The specificity of management decision-making in this area lies in the simultaneous participation of a large number of economic entities in the production and provision of housing and communal services to home owners and tenants. Carrying out their activities, economic entities in the sphere of housing and communal services (HCS) are forced to interact with each other, but at the same time each of them strives to achieve their goals and respect their interests. It is quite natural that these interactions have a direct impact on the level of quality of housing and communal services provided to owners and tenants. Hence the need arises to use new methodological tools that would allow assessing the quality of specific housing and communal services not only taking into account the influence of innovative mechanisms of interaction between economic entities of housing and communal services, but also combining numerical assessment measurements of consumer, technical and operational properties of the services themselves, as well as their effectiveness. In this case, the evaluated properties and characteristics can be expressed through analytical indicators that are obtained using formalized assessments or as a result of measurements using metrological tools and instruments. An approach to solving this problem will be presented in this article.

Main part

1. Goals and results of market reforms in the housing and communal services sector

Many rightly associate the beginning of reform in the housing and communal services sector with the mass privatization of the housing stock, as well as stationary and network facilities of its communal infrastructure. It was privatization that gave impetus to the emergence of a large number of private operators in this area, which required the creation of an institutional market environment and the introduction of competitive mechanisms to ensure effective interaction. At the same time, it became obvious that the interactions of economic entities in the housing and communal services sector have their own fundamental features, which are manifested in the development of competitive mechanisms. On the one hand, the mechanisms of interaction between economic entities in this area have all the signs of direct competition between them as suppliers various types utility resources and as producers of housing and communal services, providing them on the terms various kinds business contracts. But, on the other hand, depending on the profile of their activities, economic entities in this sphere compete with each other in specific housing and communal services markets, for example, in the field of management and operation of the housing stock, stationary and network utilities infrastructure. Taking into account this circumstance required the improvement of existing and the creation of new effective mechanisms for interaction between economic entities in the housing and communal services sector.

The dynamic growth of financial turnover in the housing and communal services sector has currently exceeded 4 trillion. rub. . This circumstance became an important incentive for attracting funds from private investors and led to an increase in the share of private operators in the housing and communal services market from 2 to 20%, as well as the share of the housing stock transferred into ownership by the population, from 42% in 1995 to 82% at the end 2016. For the ongoing management and operation of the existing housing stock, homeowners and tenants engage management organizations represented by private management companies (MCs) or homeowners' associations (HOAs). Over the past few years, the share of private management companies has more than doubled and today stands at 82%. Another 16.2% of management organizations are represented by HOAs.

The consequence of market reforms and changes in ownership patterns by the bulk of economic entities in the housing and communal services sector is the fact that today in the housing and communal services market most of the services are provided by private operators, the legal forms of ownership of which are quite diverse. The increase in the share of private operators engaged in the provision of housing and communal services to housing owners and tenants, along with the increase in the diversity of their forms of ownership, should certainly be considered a positive result of market reforms. However, despite the presence of positive changes, a fully competitive institutional market environment in the housing and communal services sector has not been formed at this point in time, the introduction of innovative mechanisms for interaction between economic entities in this area is developing at a slow pace, and most importantly, they do not in any way affect the actual implementation of market reforms. At the same time, one of the most difficult problems hindering the development of market relations in the housing and communal services sector is the discrepancy between the quality of housing and communal services provided to home owners and tenants, the established requirements and current regulatory indicators.

In this regard, in the course of further research, the concept of “quality of housing and communal services” as an economic category will be defined, the features of foreign experience and the approaches used to solve the problem under study will be briefly analyzed, and methodological tools for measuring and assessing the quality of housing and communal services will be proposed.

1. Determining the content of the economic category “quality of housing and communal services”

The determination of the economic essence of the category “quality” in relation to services both in our country and abroad is carried out on the basis of the requirements of state standards. In Russia, the definition of the “quality” category regarding a particular service is established by GOST ISO 9000-2011. In accordance with the requirements of this document, the quality of a service is understood as the totality of its properties and characteristics, through which the satisfaction of user needs is achieved, determined by the expected action of factors associated with the implementation of their professional activity, individual preferences, increasing well-being, creating conditions for normal life. However, user needs tend to change over time, usually in the direction of increasing their quality and expanding the range. Therefore, organizations engaged in the production and provision of various types of services must take this circumstance into account in their activities, along with the constant increase in competition and continuous development scientific and technological progress. On this basis, we can conclude that the economic essence of the “quality” category in relation to services in the housing and communal services sector lies in their ability to satisfy the ever-growing needs of users - home owners and tenants. To do this, economic entities in the housing and communal services sector in their practical activities must constantly strive to improve the quality of the housing and communal services they provide, expanding their range and improving quality characteristics in order to maximally satisfy the needs of home owners and tenants.

Thus, the starting point of the economic essence of the category “quality” in relation to housing and communal services is the needs of users - owners and tenants of housing. Initially, they are assumed, and subsequently established in the relevant regulatory documents in the form of quality indicators and become mandatory for compliance and implementation by economic entities in the housing and communal services sector. According to their functional purpose, these indicators can be ranked by type and category in accordance with the various requirements for the quality of housing and communal services imposed by homeowners and tenants. This leads to another definition of the economic essence of the category “quality” in relation to housing and communal services - it should be understood as the degree of compliance of the properties and characteristics inherent in a particular service with the needs of home owners and tenants, expressed through the corresponding indicators established in regulatory documents.

Considering that the vast majority of services are of an intangible nature, and their materialization occurs only at the moment of consumption, that is, as a result of the interaction of an economic entity and a specific user, we will formulate a generalized approach to revealing the economic essence of the category “quality” in relation to housing and communal services. A specific service can be considered to have adequate quality provided that, on the one hand, a specific economic entity in the housing and communal services sector has the appropriate abilities and potential to produce this service, subject to compliance with and fulfillment of the quality indicators established in regulatory documents. On the other hand, any consumer of this service will perceive it as fully complying with the requirements of regulatory documents and the indicators specified in them.

1. Approaches to solving the problem of improving the quality of housing and communal services abroad

Currently, economic entities that provide management and operation of the existing housing stock of our country, for a number of objective (significant physical wear and tear of equipment and network infrastructure) and subjective ( slow pace the introduction of innovative mechanisms for interaction between economic entities, etc.) reasons cannot fully provide home owners and tenants with even the minimum volume of housing and communal services of adequate quality. Moreover, compared to most developed countries The housing and communal services sector in Russia is still significantly inferior in terms of the range and quality of housing and communal services provided to home owners and tenants. The current situation is largely explained by different approaches to the management and operation of the existing housing stock. Abroad, improving the quality of housing and communal services is largely based on separating the management and operation of the existing housing stock into an independent activity. This approach stimulates the creation of a competitive market for professional management companies and helps attract small businesses to the housing and communal services sector. As a result, there is a constant increase in the supply of housing management services in the housing and communal services market, and homeowners and tenants can almost always choose the management company that is able to provide them with services of higher quality and a wider range. Let's show this using the example of two countries that are our northern neighbors.

So, in Sweden quality control of housing and communal services provided to housing owners and tenants is ensured by their unions and associations, which are quite widely developed throughout the country. As a rule, each union or association has its own headquarters and branches at the regional and municipal levels, which are organized on a territorial basis. Naturally, through these organizations there is interaction with municipalities and government agencies authorities, and also monitors prices for the entire range of housing and utility services. The members of such unions and associations today include hundreds of thousands of homeowners and tenants. The main goal of these organizations is to involve owners and tenants of housing in the process of managing its operation and increasing their interest in obtaining quality housing and communal services. To achieve this, one of two common models is usually used - the “discount” model or the “depreciation” model. The “discount” model is based on the ability to choose the range of services that the owner or tenant of the property wants to receive. Payment for services is set in proportion to the selected assortment. The “depreciation” model is based on the economical use of all types of consumed utility resources. Naturally, with greater savings in resources, the owner or tenant of housing pays a smaller amount for the housing and utility services he consumes.

In Finland, the housing stock consists of about 1.4 million houses. Quality control over the provision of housing and communal services is carried out by about 70 thousand joint-stock companies, which unite home owners and tenants. Of these, almost 50 thousand involve private operators who are also involved in managing the operation of the housing stock, and approximately 20 thousand are engaged in monitoring and managing the operation of the housing stock independently.

Private operators monitor the quality of the provision of housing and communal services and manage the operation of the housing stock on the basis of contracts that clearly stipulate all the conditions for the provision of housing and communal services, their range and cost. In turn, private operators on competitive terms can choose to provide housing and communal services to an operating organization, which, under a contract, will either provide services independently or attract other specialized companies for this purpose. The operating organization annually reports to the owners and tenants of housing on its financial situation. Thanks to this approach, the housing and communal services sector in Finland is distinguished by high quality housing and utility services, which are provided to consumers almost uninterruptedly.

In Finland, the housing and communal services sector has long become a normal business that operates sustainably in any conditions. At the same time, it does not matter how the housing stock is managed, since the entire management system is built on common principles: reducing costs, saving resources and introducing innovative technologies. For example, to obtain thermal energy, three sources can be used - coal, gas and hydroelectric power. The choice, as a rule, is made in favor of a cheaper source of resources, and in case of an unexpected increase in peak loads, large cities have backup boiler houses with the necessary reserves of resources.

Municipalities closely monitor the activities of private operators to ensure that they do not have any explicit competitive advantages, and also ensure that any owner or tenant of housing has not only the right, but also the technical capabilities to choose an alternative supplier of housing and communal services. To do this, he must only timely pay for the provided housing and communal services from an alternative supplier.

Naturally, maintaining the communal infrastructure in working order and updating it requires certain financial resources. To minimize them in Finland do not allow wear of utility equipment to exceed 60%. Therefore, the volume of one-time attracted financial resources, as a rule, is not significant. The receipt of the required volumes of financial resources always occurs in a timely manner, since the management system of the housing and communal services sector is simple and transparent, and obtaining a loan is not a problem either for the municipality or for the private operator.

Summarizing the approaches used abroad to solving the problem of improving the quality of provision of housing and communal services to housing owners and tenants, we can conclude that in order to achieve this goal, they unite into non-profit consumer organizations that manage and operate the housing stock while simultaneously monitoring the quality of the housing and communal services provided. In most countries, forms of associations of homeowners and tenants have become widespread, such as: territorial communities, condominiums and housing cooperatives in the USA and Canada; unions and associations in Sweden; joint stock companies in Finland. It is these structures that currently ensure the provision of housing and communal services of appropriate quality and further increase in its level.

1. Methodological tools for measuring and assessing the quality of housing and communal services

According to the author, the methodological tools for measuring and assessing the quality of housing and communal services should accumulate numerical estimates of the consumer, technical and operational properties of the service, as well as its effectiveness, expressed analytically, using formalized assessments or measured using metrological tools and instruments. A functional diagram reflecting the concept of identified quality of housing and communal services is shown in the figure.

Assessing the quality of housing and communal services is of a system-technical nature, since it covers the entire set of the above assessment measurements. Identification of the quality of housing and communal services occurs initially during its design, when the target task of providing a new type of service is formed. In addition, it can take place when conducting a rapid assessment of several types of housing and communal services, when it is necessary to solve the problem of determining the highest quality service from those presented in the group.

Figure 1. Functional diagram reflecting the concept of identified quality of housing and communal services.

The quality of housing and communal services is determined by the totality of its properties and characteristics, reflecting its ability to satisfy the needs of home owners and tenants. Since assessment of the quality of housing and communal services, as a rule, is always carried out taking into account the requests and requirements of its specific consumers, the choice of quality indicators should be based on a thorough study of all its essential properties. The form in which the quality of housing and communal services is assessed is determined by its goals and objectives. When assessing the quality of housing and communal services, the following problem is usually solved: within a certain time, it is necessary to determine from a number of considered housing and communal services the highest quality one, depending on the totality of its functional properties and characteristics, using for this purpose a suitable mathematical apparatus and acceptable methodological tools.

In accordance with the main functional properties and characteristics of housing and communal services, their quality is usually assessed taking into account various indicators: single (to characterize private quality); determining (dominant in quality assessment); generalized (taking into account several qualitative indicators simultaneously); integral (evaluating almost simultaneously the entire set of functional properties and characteristics). From the standpoint of assessing the quality of housing and communal services, it is most preferable to have integral indicators at the output, however, this is not always possible to do, since many of the functional properties and characteristics of these services still remain undisclosed.

Since assessing the quality of housing and communal services is currently an urgent task, to solve it it is important to have existing or develop new methodological assessment tools, taking into account the features of the provision of housing and communal services, as well as their functional properties and characteristics.

The process of assessing the quality of housing and communal services can be divided into three stages:

1) systemic assessment, which includes the formation of degrees of identified quality with the mandatory determination of numerical values ​​of the functional properties and characteristics of housing and communal services;

2) expert assessment, as a result of which the degrees of identified quality of housing and communal services are ranked according to their weight value;

3) computational assessment, which allows you to calculate degrees of quality and conduct full-scale or bench tests of the quality characteristics of a specific housing and communal services.

At the stage of system assessment, the main subject of consideration is the determination of such degrees of quality that have numerical measures obtained by calculations or measurements, and objectively characterize the quality of a specific housing and communal services. When systematically assessing the quality of housing and communal services, they are considered as a system, the totality of quality levels of which makes it possible to objectively judge the achieved level of quality. The idea of ​​the integrity of the assessment system is based on the necessary and sufficient number of system-forming degrees of quality. In this case, some degrees of quality can be formed, but in the process of its identification it may turn out that not entirely satisfactory results will be obtained. The database of quality grades is an open system, and the system for assessing the quality of housing and communal services itself can be considered as multidimensional and multi-connected.

At the stage of expert assessment of the quality of housing and communal services, a group of 5–7 narrow specialists who are well familiar with services of this type is formed. Having a formed base of quality degrees, they rank them by importance, that is, by weight values. The proposed evaluation method uses a binary numeric measure, so the significance rank is nothing more than a weighting coefficient. The result of the expert stage of assessing the quality of housing and communal services is an expert opinion.

At the stage of computational assessment of the quality of housing and communal services, the calculated values ​​of the degrees of quality are determined. Based on numerical measures for all degrees of quality obtained at the previous stage, quality assessments of housing and communal services are formed in the binary number system. The resulting binary measure is converted to decimal and a specific housing and utility service is assigned a rating of decimal system Reckoning. At the same time, it can be argued that the higher the numerical rating, the higher the level of quality of a specific housing and communal services.

Conclusion

Based on the results obtained during the research, the following conclusions can be drawn:

1. Despite the dynamic growth in the turnover of financial resources in the housing and communal services sector in recent years, the process of its reform is not proceeding at a fast enough pace. Most of the set goals have not yet been achieved, and the existing positive results cannot convince anyone of the successful implementation of market reforms in the housing and communal services sector.
2. The economic content of the category “quality of housing and communal services” has been determined, which should be understood as a certain degree of compliance of the properties and characteristics inherent in a particular service with the needs of home owners and tenants, expressed through the corresponding indicators established in regulatory documents.
3. The economic essence of some approaches to solving the problem of improving the quality of housing and communal services abroad is revealed using the example of countries such as Sweden and Finland. Summarizing the approaches used abroad, we can conclude that in order to solve the problem of improving the quality of provision of housing and communal services, home owners and tenants unite into non-profit consumer organizations that manage and operate the housing stock while simultaneously monitoring the quality of the housing and communal services provided.
4. A new methodological toolkit for measuring and assessing the quality of housing and communal services is proposed, which combines numerical assessment measurements of consumer, technical and operational properties of the services themselves, as well as their effectiveness, through analytically expressed indicators that are obtained using formalized assessments or as a result of measurements using metrological means and devices.

Bibliography

480 rub. | 150 UAH | $7.5 ", MOUSEOFF, FGCOLOR, "#FFFFCC",BGCOLOR, "#393939");" onMouseOut="return nd();"> Dissertation - 480 RUR, delivery 10 minutes

240 rub. | 75 UAH | $3.75 ", MOUSEOFF, FGCOLOR, "#FFFFCC",BGCOLOR, "#393939");" onMouseOut="return nd();"> Abstract - 240 RUR, delivery 10 minutes, around the clock, seven days a week and holidays

Akifeva Larisa Vladimirovna. Improving the quality of provision of housing and communal services to the population: dis. ... candidate of economic sciences: 08.00.05 / Akifeva Larisa Vladimirovna; [Place of defense: State budgetary educational institution of higher professional education "Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic Institute"]. - Knyaginino, 2013 - 155 p.

Introduction

CHAPTER 1. Theoretical foundations for improving the quality of housing and communal services 9

1.1. Essence and classification of housing and communal services 9

1.2. Quality of housing and communal services and factors influencing it 20

1.3. Domestic practice of improving the quality of housing and communal services 37

CHAPTER 2. Monitoring the quality of housing and communal services

2.1. The state of the housing and communal services sector in the Nizhny Novgorod region and its impact on the quality of provision of housing and communal services 48

2.2. Assessment of the quality of housing and communal services provided in the region from the perspective of the main group of consumers 61

2.3. Problems of improving the quality of housing and communal services at the microzonal level 72

CHAPTER 3. Main directions for improving the quality of housing and communal services 80

3.1. Methodology for assessing the quality of provision of housing and communal services 80

3.2. Improving state control over the quality of provision of housing and communal services in the Nizhny Novgorod region 106

3.3. System of measures to improve the quality of housing and communal services based on improvement organizational structure control 120

Conclusions and suggestions 131

Bibliographic list of references 134

Introduction to the work

Relevance of the research topic. Housing and communal services are one of the most significant sectors of the socio-economic system, influencing all aspects of society. The reform of the housing and communal services (HCS) has been taking place for more than 20 years and consists of its transition to market relations. In market relations, the stimulating factor is improving the quality of housing and communal services (HCS). At the same time, the ratio of price and quality, as well as the availability of housing and communal services, are fundamental factors in the livelihoods of the population and characterize the quality of life.

Despite the fact that large amounts of money are being invested in reforming the industry, it remains in a difficult condition and is characterized by the unsatisfactory condition of the housing stock, high wear and tear of communal infrastructure, ineffective management structure, etc. 24% of citizens’ appeals to the Reception of the President of the Russian Federation are related to the quality of housing and communal services provided, which determines the need to modernize the industry and search for measures to improve the efficiency and quality of the provision of housing and communal services.

The methodological basis for systematic quality improvement is quality management, i.e., organized influence on factors that influence the level of quality of housing and communal services, and as a result, increasing the economic efficiency of enterprises providing these services.

The relevance and high importance of improving the quality of provision of housing and communal services determined the choice of topic, purpose and objectives of the study.

The degree of development of the problem. The following authors contributed to the development of theory, methodology, formation and regulation of the sphere of housing and communal services: N. G. Aminova, E. V. Agitaeva, O. V. Zhuravleva, I. P. Ivanova, E. A. Kameneva, Yu. N. Kazanov, E. I. Nikolaeva, N. V. Provalenova, V. V. Svetitskaya, Yu. F. Simionov, N. I. Sutyagina, Yu. V. Tishukova, L. N. Chernysheva and others.

Improving the quality of products, services, as well as implementing systemic and integrated approaches The works of O. V. Aristova, J. Juran, E. N. Mikheeva, V. M. Mishin, A. G. Zekunov, K. V. Temirov and others are devoted to its solution.

The works of O. N. Alferina, I. N. Guseinov, A. P. Litvinsky, S. P. Notenko, I. N. Ryzhenko, N. A. Solo are devoted to the problems of improving the quality of provision of housing and communal services.

matova, N. A. Sosnovsky, N. A. Khromov, A. A. Chaliev, T. V. Shibanova and others.

Assessing the results obtained in the works of the listed authors, it can be noted that most of the materials are critical in nature, while problems arise in improving the quality of housing and communal services of a practical nature. This determined the choice of research topic, setting goals and objectives.

Purpose and objectives of the study. The purpose of the dissertation work is to develop theoretical and practical recommendations to improve the quality of provision of housing and communal services to the population.

Achieving the research goal involves solving the following tasks:

Develop a classification of housing and communal services and determine their essence;

consider the concept of “quality of housing and communal services” and identify factors influencing its improvement;

analyze domestic experience in improving the quality of housing and communal services;

conduct an analysis of the quality assurance of housing and communal services on the part of manufacturers and assess the quality of housing and communal services from the consumer’s perspective, including at the microzonal level;

develop and test a methodology for assessing the quality of provision of housing and communal services;

explore the system of state quality control of housing and communal services and propose measures to improve it;

Design a system of quality improvement measures
Housing and communal services

Object of study. The object of the study is organizations providing housing and communal services.

Subject of study. The subject of the study is a set of economic, organizational and managerial relations related to ensuring the quality of housing and communal services.

Theoretical and methodological basis research compiled the works of domestic economists and practitioners on the problems of the quality of provision of housing and communal services, reforming the housing and communal services of Russia, management of housing and communal services, legal acts of the Russian Federation and the Nizhny Novgorod region.

The methodological basis of the study is a systematic approach, economic and statistical analysis, calculation and analytical method, comparison methods, statistical method, grouping method, questionnaire survey, expert assessments.

Research information base based on data from the Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation and the territorial body of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Nizhny Novgorod Region, the Ministry of Housing and Communal Services and the Fuel and Energy Complex of the Nizhny Novgorod Region, the Ministry of Economy of the Nizhny Novgorod Region, federal and regional regulations and programs, programs for the integrated development of utility infrastructure systems municipalities of the Nizhny Novgorod region, materials of scientific and practical conferences, methodological developments and recommendations on the issues being studied, monographs, scientific publications on the topic of research, materials of reference and legal systems and information and analytical systems on the Internet.

Scientific novelty of the research is as follows:

a classification of housing and communal services was proposed, the main criterion of which was the form of relations between the producer and consumer of housing and communal services, taking into account the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of services, which contributes to the formation of the most complete and clear idea of ​​the services of the housing and communal services system;

factors influencing the quality of provision of housing and communal services were systematized, the most significant factors for improving the quality of these services were identified (state and public control, restructuring of the organizational structure of enterprise management, quality management system, certification). When developing a development strategy, the management of the enterprise needs to take into account these factors in order to increase the competitiveness of the housing and communal services;

The methodology for assessing the quality of housing and communal services has been improved, allowing
to highlight the most significant indicator that objectively evaluates
quality of services. This methodology takes into account various areas of action
housing and communal services and includes a quality assessment algorithm, an indicator system
service quality lei based on a basic quality standard;

the shortcomings of the existing system of organizing state control over the quality of housing and communal services are identified and measures are proposed to improve it (restructuring of the organizational structure, the creation of a Public Council under the State Housing Inspectorate), ensuring the efficiency of decisions made regarding improving the quality of service provision and taking into account the interests of both the consumer and the manufacturer of housing and communal services;

tional management structure of housing and communal services enterprises, which allows to significantly improve the quality of services. As a result of the implementation of this system, the municipal unitary enterprise “Knyagininskoye Housing and Communal Services” at the end of 2015 will receive a profit from its core activities in the amount of 899 thousand rubles.

Practical significance of the study is that the use of methodological approaches to assessing the quality of housing and communal services, ways to improve quality control by government agencies, and the proposed model in combination will help improve the quality of provision of housing and communal services.

The results obtained during the study can be used in the practical activities of housing and communal services organizations, as well as as educational material in the process of preparing lecture courses, practical classes, coursework and final qualifying papers in higher and secondary educational institutions and in the system of advanced training for housing specialists -municipal services.

Approbation of research results.

The main provisions of the dissertation work were discussed and received a positive assessment at scientific and practical conferences: XI International scientific and practical conference “Cities of Russia: problems of construction, engineering support, improvement and ecology” (Penza, 2009), international scientific and practical conference “Socio-economic problems of the development of municipalities” (Knyaginino, 2009, 2010), Nizhny Novgorod session of young scientists. Humanities (Nizhny Novgorod 2009, 2010, 2012).

The developments of the dissertation research are used in the educational process of the Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic Institute, approved and accepted for implementation by the municipal unitary enterprise "Teplovik 1", the municipal unitary enterprise "Knyagininskoe Housing and Communal Services" of the Knyagininsky district of the Nizhny Novgorod region.

Structure and scope of work. The dissertation consists of an introduction, three chapters, conclusions and proposals, bibliography and applications. The main content is presented on 140 pages of typewritten text, the work includes 42 figures, 24 tables, a bibliography of 93 titles and 6 appendices.

Quality of housing and communal services and factors influencing it

S. P. Notenko and others consider housing and communal services as the result of direct interaction between the performer and the consumer of services, as well as the work of the manufacturer aimed at meeting the needs of the consumer.

Kameneva E. A. defines housing and communal services (work) as an activity that has or does not have a material embodiment, based on the interaction of the producer and the consumer regarding the maintenance of the common property of an apartment building, the sale of cold water supply, hot water supply, sewerage, electricity supply, gas supply and heating as part of the management of an apartment building.

In our opinion, Notenko S.P., Kameneva E.A. et al. determine only the relationship between the consumer and the manufacturer of housing and communal services, without taking into account the level of quality of the provision of these services.

Svetitskaya V.V. defined housing and communal services as services to ensure and maintain comfortable living conditions for the population and the activities of business entities and including interrelated types of housing and communal services.

Zhuravleva O.V. proposes to understand housing and communal services as economic services, which mean actions performed by individuals and legal entities to maintain and restore proper technical and sanitary housing stock, equipment, communications and housing and communal facilities, removal of household goods waste and supply of electrical energy to consumers, drinking water, gas, thermal energy and hot water.

Sutyagina N.I. determines that housing and communal services have the following characteristics: belonging to the life support group; 12 social significance; constant demand; general availability; low substitutability with other services. Solomatova N.A. reveals the concept of “housing and communal services” as a “trusted” product, the quality and volume of which can be assessed after provision.

In our opinion, housing and communal services must be understood as those delivered to the consumer material media various types of services that ensure satisfaction of consumer needs for comfortable living.

As practice shows, housing and communal services organizations specialize in providing one or more types of services. In this study, we considered services related to the functioning of a residential facility, since they satisfy the primary needs of the population and have high social significance.

The concept of “housing and communal services”, as well as “housing and communal services”, can be divided into two components – “housing services” and “utilities”. Housing services are services provided to consumers living in housing stock to ensure comfortable, prosperous living. They are directly related to the maintenance of housing stock.

Operation of the housing stock includes technical and sanitary maintenance of buildings, current and major repairs of residential facilities.

Technical maintenance is a set of works to maintain the serviceable level of building elements and specified parameters, as well as the operating modes of its technical devices, which ensures the normal functioning of buildings and engineering systems during the service life of the building with use in the required conditions. The sanitary maintenance of a building is a set of measures aimed at maintaining the sanitary and epidemiological standards of residential buildings, as well as providing a comfortable living environment for the building’s residents.

Current repairs are repairs that involve performing work to protect parts of the building and engineering equipment from premature wear by identifying minor damage and malfunctions.

Overhaul involves replacing worn structures and parts with new, more durable and economical ones. At the same time, the operational characteristics of a residential building are significantly improved.

To improve the technical and consumer properties and qualities, reconstruction and modernization of the housing stock is carried out.

According to Yu. V. Tishukov, utility services are the activities of the provider of utility services for cold water supply, sanitation, electricity supply, gas supply and heating, providing comfortable living conditions for citizens in residential premises.

The concept of “utilities” is specified for each type in the “Rules for the provision of utility services to citizens,” where their definition is given.

The “Rules for the Provision of Public Utilities” give the following definitions of public services: cold water supply is the supply of cold drinking water supplied through centralized cold water supply networks and in-house engineering systems to a residential building (household), to residential and non-residential premises in an apartment building, to the premises that are part of the common property in an apartment building, as well as to the water stand in the case where the apartment building or residential building (household) is not equipped with in-house cold water supply systems; hot water supply is the supply of hot water supplied through centralized hot water supply networks and in-house engineering systems to a residential building (household), to residential and non-residential premises in an apartment building, as well as to premises that are part of the common property in an apartment building; drainage is the removal of domestic wastewater from a residential building (household), from residential and non-residential premises in an apartment building, as well as from premises that are part of the common property in an apartment building, through centralized drainage networks and in-house engineering systems; electricity supply is the supply of electrical energy supplied through centralized power supply networks and in-house engineering systems to a residential building (household), to residential and non-residential premises in an apartment building, as well as to premises that are part of the common property in an apartment building; gas supply is the supply of gas supplied through centralized gas supply networks and intra-building engineering systems to a residential building (household), to residential and non-residential premises in an apartment building, to premises that are part of the common property in an apartment building, as well as the sale of household gas in cylinders ; Heating is the supply of thermal energy through centralized heating networks and intra-building engineering heating systems, ensuring the maintenance in a residential building, in residential and non-residential premises in an apartment building, in premises that are part of the common property in an apartment building, the air temperature specified in the Rules for the provision Housing and communal services

Domestic practice of improving the quality of housing and communal services

As can be seen from Table 7, in the Nizhny Novgorod region there is a rather low level of satisfaction with the quality of provision of housing and communal services to the population. The largest share of the population surveyed, satisfied with the quality of housing and communal services, lives in the Semenovsky district (65.8%). The lowest rate is observed in the Vorotynsky district (10.5%).

In order to identify the reasons for the population's dissatisfaction with housing and communal services, we conducted a survey of 1,450 people over 18 years of age in 4 municipal districts of the Nizhny Novgorod region, included in the 5th group of the group, having average level satisfaction of the population with housing and communal services, similarity in socio-economic development, bordering each other and located in the southwest of the region. IN this group included the following districts: Bolshemurashkinsky, Spassky, Knyagininsky, Sergachsky (Appendix 2). The quality and efficiency of the provision of housing and communal services is largely determined by the way an apartment building is managed. When asked which method of managing multi-apartment residential buildings, in your opinion, is the most effective, 53% of respondents noted HOA (Fig. 20).

It should be noted that currently not a single HOA has been created in the Knyagininsky, Spassky and Bolshemurashkinsky districts. This is largely due to the fact that there are financial difficulties, problems of legal registration and a particularly high degree of depreciation of the housing stock.

The survey showed that 24% of the population assess the work of the housing and communal services system as “satisfactory”, 56% of respondents assess the work of the housing and communal services as “unsatisfactory”, 36% give a rating of “bad” and 16% give a rating of “good” (Fig. 21). Badly

Residents of Spassky (76%) and Sergachsky (58%) districts gave the highest ratings to the work of housing and communal services enterprises. Housing and communal services enterprises of the Bolshemurashkinsky and Spassky districts received the lowest ratings from respondents. The total proportion of respondents who rated “bad” and “unsatisfactory” in these areas was 84%.

Since housing and communal services provide various services, we will identify among the respondents the most problematic areas of housing and communal services that require priority solutions in the opinion of respondents. As can be seen from Fig. 22, the survey results showed that there are problems in almost all areas in this area.

Also acute are the problems of cleaning (51%) and lighting streets (47%), landscaping entrances (42%) and courtyards (38%), and garbage removal (46%). The problem of street cleaning is most acute in the Knyagininsky and Bolshemurashkinsky districts.

Despite the heterogeneity, it was important to establish the presence of optimistic expectations among respondents for the improvement of the provided housing and communal services (Fig. 23).

Answering the question: “What prevents our city and regional center from becoming a standard of cleanliness, beauty and order?”, the majority (71%) of respondents believe that the cleanliness of a populated area depends on the self-awareness, upbringing and level of culture of city residents. On average, almost every third (37%) respondent in the region believes that the lack of coordinated work between housing and communal services structures hinders the restoration of order in cities.

Assessing the measures taken by the leadership of the city or village for its improvement When assessing the measures taken by the leadership of the city or village, the majority - 32% of the total population of respondents, note the measures taken by the leadership as rather productive (Fig. 25). Almost a fifth of the population surveyed considers them ineffective (29%), 20% - rather ineffective. 13% of respondents, or almost every eighth, found it difficult to answer.

Today the problem of water supply remains hot topic in matters of improving the quality of life of people, where the main point is the uninterrupted supply of water. The majority (54%) of the population surveyed assessed the operational condition of the water supply system as satisfactory (Fig. 26). This especially worries residents of the city of Knyaginino, because in the summer there are frequent interruptions in water supply due to the dilapidation of the water supply network.

During the survey, respondents were asked to answer the question: “Does, in your opinion, drinking water meet sanitary and hygienic requirements?” As the survey results showed, 37% noted that water does not always meet sanitary and hygienic standards, 33% answered that it does, 28% expressed their opinion about the low quality of drinking water, 2% found it difficult to answer (Fig. 27).

In the Nizhny Novgorod region, water supply issues are still pressing, which is associated with the emergency condition of water supply and sewer pipes. The surveyed population of the region associates this, first of all, with insufficient funding for this area - 32% of respondents think so, 11% are sure that part of the allocated funds is used for other purposes, 30% are sure that this is due to the low professional level of housing and communal services workers, 19% responded that the workers of housing and communal services themselves are not interested in quality repairs.

8% of respondents entered their own answer to the question: “What is the reason for the constant repair of the same sections of water and sewer pipes?” outdated water supply system, long service life without major repairs, disrepair. When asked about power outages, 48% of respondents answered that they have power outages (Figure 28). In the “Other” column, respondents wrote: Knyaginisky district - sometimes, sometimes it happens, not for long; Spassky district - sometimes, rarely; Bolshemurashkinsky district - may be disconnected without warning; Sergach district - rarely, sometimes.

Assessment of the quality of housing and communal services provided in the region from the perspective of the main group of consumers

The Inspectorate is headed by the Head of the Inspectorate. The Head of the Inspectorate reports to the Governor of the Nizhny Novgorod Region, the Chairman of the Government and the Deputy Governor, Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Nizhny Novgorod Region.

The first deputy and deputy are subordinate to the head of the Inspectorate. The heads of structural units of the Inspectorate (deputy heads of the Inspectorate) are appointed and dismissed by order of the head of the Inspectorate.

Improving state control over the quality of provision of housing and communal services in the Nizhny Novgorod region

The quality of services provided and work performed must comply with the Rules for the provision of utility services to citizens, approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated May 6, 2011 No. 354, Rules and norms for the technical operation of the housing stock, approved by Decree of the Gosstroy of Russia dated September 27, 2003 No. 170, Maintenance Rules common property in an apartment building, approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of August 13, 2006 No. 491, the requirements of premises owners, the requirements of state standards, the terms of concluded contracts and other documentation in accordance with current legislation.

The quality of provision of housing and communal services from suppliers is controlled by organizations that manage apartment buildings under concluded agreements with the participation of consumers and directly by the owners themselves. Protection of the interests of consumers of housing and communal services is also carried out by state authorities.

At the moment, there is a whole system of authorities designed to exercise state control and supervision regarding the quality of provision of housing and communal services. These bodies in the Nizhny Novgorod region include: the Ministry of Housing and Communal Services and the Fuel and Energy Complex of the Nizhny Novgorod Region, the State Housing Inspectorate of the Nizhny Novgorod Region, the Office of the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare in the Nizhny Novgorod Region. Let's take a closer look at their activities.

The Ministry of Housing and Communal Services and Fuel and Energy Complex of the Nizhny Novgorod Region is an executive body of the Nizhny Novgorod Region, formed in accordance with the Law of the Nizhny Novgorod Region dated October 3, 2007 No. 129-Z “On the Government of the Nizhny Novgorod Region” and the Decree of the Governor of the Nizhny Novgorod Region dated August 10, 2010 year No. 50 “On approval of the structure of executive authorities of the Nizhny Novgorod region” and carrying out the formation and implementation of state policy, public administration and regulation in the field of housing and communal services and the fuel and energy complex, public management of energy saving and increasing energy efficiency, coordination of development and functioning of housing and communal services and the fuel and energy complex of the Nizhny Novgorod region. The Ministry of Housing and Communal Services and Fuel and Energy Complex of the Nizhny Novgorod Region has the following areas of activity: electric power, gas supply and gasification, water supply, sewerage, energy saving and alternative energy sources, heat and power engineering, housing stock, heating and improvement.

The specialized government bodies for monitoring the quality of provision of housing and communal services to the population are the State Housing Inspectorate of the Nizhny Novgorod Region, the Office of the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare in the Nizhny Novgorod Region.

The State Housing Inspectorate of the Nizhny Novgorod Region (hereinafter referred to as the State Housing Inspectorate) was formed on the basis of Decree of the Administration of the Nizhny Novgorod Region dated 03/23/1999 No. 69 “On the formation of the State Housing Inspectorate of the Nizhny Novgorod Region”, adopted in pursuance of the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 04/28/1997 No. 425 “On housing reform - housing and communal services in the Russian Federation" and the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of September 26, 1994 No. 1086 "On the state housing inspection in the Russian Federation".

Initially, the State Housing Inspectorate was a structural unit of the Administration of the Nizhny Novgorod Region with the rights of a department.

In 2001, based on clause 1.5. Regulations on the Ministry of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Nizhny Novgorod Region, approved by Decree of the Government of the Nizhny Novgorod Region dated December 18, 2001 No. 53, the Ministry of Construction and Housing and Communal Services became the legal successor of the structural divisions of the Administration of the Nizhny Novgorod Region, including the State Housing Inspectorate.

In accordance with the Decree of the Governor of the Nizhny Novgorod Region dated October 31, 2003 No. 62, the State Housing Inspectorate is classified as “other executive authorities.”

The main tasks of the State Housing Inspectorate are to implement a unified state policy in the field of use and maintenance of the housing stock; prevention, detection and suppression of offenses in the housing sector in accordance with the current legislation of the Russian Federation and the Nizhny Novgorod region and taking appropriate administrative measures against them.

Rychkov, Evgeniy Evgenievich