Civil conflict in a country it is always the responsibility of its government. Therefore, when the Ukrainian authorities blame Russia for the crisis in Donbass, it looks as if someone is trying to abdicate responsibility and shift it onto their neighbor. If you refresh your memory, it turns out that only thanks to Russia this conflict did not move into its most fatal phase.
Let us remember - in 2014, at the height of the war in south-eastern Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin presented his peace plan to resolve the conflict - specific and step-by-step, requiring the participation of both sides. The formulations from this plan are still quite relevant today.
First, Putin proposed stopping active offensive operations in the Donetsk and Lugansk directions. The second is to “withdraw armed units security forces Ukraine to a distance excluding the possibility of shelling populated areas with artillery and all types of multiple launch rocket systems.” The third is “the implementation of full and objective international control over compliance with the terms of the ceasefire and monitoring the situation in the security zone thus created.”
The Russian President called on the conflicting parties to immediately coordinate these actions. Moreover, Putin and Poroshenko even had a phone conversation on this score, following which Poroshenko announced a permanent ceasefire - it was announced that the points of view of the two presidents “substantially coincide.” And within a few days, the notorious “Minsk agreements” appeared, developed by Vladimir Putin with French President Francois Hollande, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Petro Poroshenko during their meeting in the Belarusian capital.
But what do we have at the moment? Just a week ago, the ATO press service reported on the seizure of two villages in the south-east of Ukraine as a result of offensive operation– this practice has become systematic. Artillery continually hits the southeast indiscriminately - militias, or as they are called in Ukraine, “separatists” or civilians- everyone gets hit. Well, how can one not note the recent performance of not just anyone, but the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Arsen Avakov, who, against this background, called the Minsk agreements “dead,” although even their American curators formally adhere to the points of this document.
The above-mentioned Putin’s initiatives are perhaps the only reason why Kyiv has not yet reached the apogee of its bellicose attitude; this is the factor that turned out to be the connecting link in the work of the presidents of the four countries within the Normandy format. And most importantly, these initiatives work, provided that they are implemented by the parties to the conflict. Kyiv claims that Russia is fomenting war in Ukraine, but is it so? In my opinion, the answer is obvious.
Remember all
This cannot be said to be a mass phenomenon, especially compared to the 90s of the last century. And it seems that this is not such an influential direction in the public consciousness of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. But still, various ideas of historical responsibility for the genocide of the population in the territories of present-day Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan are being revived with enviable vitality. Moreover, responsibility must be borne various kinds people's enemies who supposedly consciously sought to destroy the peoples themselves.
Sometimes they point to enemies dimly visible from the depths of time. But they often directly point to events that are not so distant. For example, Soviet authorities The 30s are accused of deliberately causing a famine, and therefore of genocide of the Kazakh people.
This, by the way, begs the question: many Kazakh families fled from hunger on the territory of Kyrgyzstan.
It turns out that in Kyrgyzstan the authorities “consciously” did not cause famine
What then are the conclusions? Either Kazakhstan, unlike its southern neighbors, was suddenly infected with the spirit of extermination of the Kazakhs, or not the entire government.
The Soviets were “exterminating” against peoples big country, and these were management errors.
First of all, in economic matters, in solving the problem of mobilizing the population for large projects, such as the rapid achievement of settlement of nomadic families, which was destroying the traditional economy.
A big project also has significant consequences. How, for example, can we evaluate the famine in the Volga region in the 1920s? From the point of view of the ideologists of the war of memory - of course, as the genocide of the Russian, Tatar, Chuvash, etc. population. If you follow their logic...
Will of the Elite
In the 90s, similar views were professed by the “reforged” workers of the ideological front, entirely former leaders party and Komsomol organizations at the regional level, or teachers of departments of some compulsory social disciplines at that time.
Just look at the biography of current national political leaders and even some presidents and prime ministers of post-Soviet states. Consequently, they solved and are now solving the problem of building sovereign states that arose on the territories of the Soviet Union.
But by what means?
It is clear that the basis of any state is a myth
After all, public consciousness is multi-layered and there is a place for mythology in it. It is clear that the future of the new independent states that emerged in 1991 is an act of consciousness of the elite, which has taken responsibility for the project of building a national sovereign statehood. But unlike a number of states that, as it seems to them, rushed to Europe, in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan they were involved in various types of wars historical memory more balanced.
Even if some myths were allowed that identified ancient ethnic formations with modern national substrates, this did not become the main trend of politics in the field of studying history.
Historians by profession can and should create different interpretations historical facts. But there is no doubt that every professional will fight for the accuracy and critical verification of the facts established in the community of historians.
Only on this basis can different approaches and different interpretations of these facts be assessed. But there is even more high level professional works – philosophical and methodological rules and principles of interpretation of facts.
The unity of all three levels is what professional activity historians.
Historians and propagandists
It’s a different matter for an ideologist and propagandist, divorced from science and systemic historical knowledge, whose craft is to work with mass consciousness and produce mindsets for a specific external project. Let us immediately emphasize: a historian by profession can act as a propagandist, but he must be responsible for the consequences of his statements, when value is understood as the integrity and safety of society.
The pseudohistorian is greedy for sensations, without which he will not be able to make a name for himself
So they are born without support established facts claims that half the population of northern Kyrgyzstan was killed during the uprising in 1916. Moreover, genocide on the part of the tsarist authorities is being conjectured.
But if some project from outside is also involved in this and where the money appeared, the pseudo-historian is ready to utter any sensational ideas and say with a breath: “It turns out that this is how it was!” That's how they unfold historical wars memory. All that remains is to appeal to the mass of people who are not experienced in historical knowledge, and the construct hostile to social integrity is ready.
Society is split along ethnic lines, and ideas of hatred towards the other part and supposedly its historical responsibility for the past are reproduced in it.
This can lead to bloody events
And if they are not fought with the means of “medicine” of historical knowledge, the social organism may wither away.
And it’s good that in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, at the level of responsible management structures, there is an understanding of the importance of countering attempts to start memory wars.
The Islamic terrorist organization “Army of Iraq and the Levant” unexpectedly captured almost the entire north of the Republic of Iraq. Government troops fled from the enemy so quickly that today there are questions about the future existence of this country - there was practically no one to resist the advancing extremists. Today, a lot of journalism has appeared on the topic of how this became possible, who is to blame for this, what role is played here by oil and gas, which this Middle Eastern region is very rich in.
Meanwhile, many analysts have completely missed the fact that this is not just about big geopolitics or control over energy resources. The radical religious confrontation between Sunnis and Shiites also plays its ominous role.
The fact is that the majority of Iraqis belong to the Shiite branch of Islam. However, under Saddam Hussein, Iraq's ruling elite was a Sunni minority. It is not surprising that after his overthrow, power passed to the Shiites, but the Sunnis took a hostile position towards the new government. It was they who became the main cadres for replenishing the local terrorist underground, which struck both the Shiites and the American occupiers. Over time, this underground grew into a formidable force - into the same “Army of Iraq and the Levant” that today threatens Iraqi statehood...
So what is the essence of the Sunni-Shiite conflict?
People of the Book
More than 90% of all people professing Islam are Sunnis (from Arabic: Ahl al-Sunnah - people of the Sunnah), their number today amounts to more than one billion people. Sunnis place special emphasis only on following the sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad (his actions and statements), on loyalty to tradition, on the participation of the community in choosing its head - the caliph. However, in some movements of Islam this takes extreme forms. For example, under the Taliban in Afghanistan, special attention was paid even to the nature of clothing and the size of the beard of men; every detail of everyday life was regulated in accordance with the requirements of the “sunna”.
It is not surprising, therefore, that the most radical schools in Islam were founded by Sunnis. For example, Wahhabism is a teaching within the framework of Sunnism, created in the middle of the 18th century religious figure Saudi Arabia Muhammad bin Abd al-Wahhab. The basis of Wahhabism is the idea of monotheism. Supporters of this teaching reject all innovations introduced into Islam (for example, the worship of saints and imams, as Shiites do) and demand strict worship of Allah exclusively, as was the case in early Islam. The teachings of al-Wahhab were at one time supported by many Arabian sheikhs. Including the family of Saudis, who united the Arabian Peninsula under their rule. Wahhabism eventually became the official ideology of Saudi Arabia and a number of other Arab emirates.
Many radical Wahhabis took part in the war in Chechnya. The largest ultra-radical terrorist organization of the Wahhabi branch of Islam is Al-Qaeda (Arabic for “foundation”, “base”), founded in 1988. After the withdrawal of USSR troops from Afghanistan, al-Qaeda directed the spearhead of the fight against the United States and the countries of the so-called “ Western world"and their supporters in Islamic countries. The goal of the organization is to overthrow the secular regimes in these countries and create the “Great Islamic Caliphate”...
Today, all Muslims unanimously recognize that Allah is the only god, and Muhammad is his messenger. They all follow the five basic tenets of Islam, including fasting during the month of Ramadan; the main holy book for all is the Koran. However, if adherents of Sunnism in their practice of Islam pay special attention to following the teachings (sunna) of the Prophet, then Shiites consider their prophets - the ayatollahs - to be messengers of God on earth. Because of this, Sunnis often accuse Shiites of heresy, and they, in turn, point to the excessive dogmatism of Sunni teaching, which leads to the emergence of extremist movements such as Wahhabism.
Activist of the “Party of Allah”
Shiites stood out from the general mass of Muslims a very long time ago, in the 7th century, when in the medieval Arab Caliphate A struggle for power began between the son-in-law of the Prophet Muhammad Ali and his opponents in the person of the Umayyad dynasty. A religious and political grouping (al-shia) of supporters of the rights of Ali and his children formed around his son-in-law. This group became the core of the Shiite movement.
Today, Shiites constitute the majority in Iran, Iraq, Azerbaijan, Lebanon and Bahrain. In addition, today they hold power in Syria in the person of the Assad family, with whom the local Sunni majority is at war. There are Shiites in Yemen, where Sunni authorities call them “separatist rebels.”
Finally, significant Shia minorities are found throughout the Arabian Peninsula: Qatar, Al-Hasa in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait. In Afghanistan, Shiites make up between 15 and 19 percent of the country's population. These include the Hazaras (mostly Shia Imamis, there are separate groups of Ismailis), some Charaimaks (followers of Ismailism) and Farsiwans. Shiism is professed by the Balti people living in Northern India and Pakistan, as well as the Burishi (Ismailis) and some Pashtun tribes: the Turis, the majority of the Bangash and some of the Orakzais. The majority of residents of the Gorno-Badakhshan region of Tajikistan also belong to the Ismaili current of Shiism...
Representatives of the “extreme” Shiites are Alawites. All Alawites are divided into a privileged group of “hassa” (“initiated”), who are the owners of sacred books and special knowledge, and the bulk - “amma” (“uninitiated”), who are assigned the role of novices-performers. The Assad family, Syrian Presidents Hafez al-Assad and his son Bashar al-Assad, belong to the Alawites. Alawites mainly live in Western Syria, as well as in Northern Lebanon and Turkey. In Syria, they make up up to 12% of the country's population.
Despite the apparent moderation, unlike the Sunnis, the Shiites are also not alien to extremist activities. Thus, the most significant Shiite organization, recognized as terrorist in many countries of the world, is Hezbollah (Arabic for “Party of Allah”), the Lebanese paramilitary Political Party, advocating the creation of an Islamic state in Lebanon modeled on Iran. Its ideological basis is the ideology of Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the Islamic revolution in Iran. In its 1985 manifesto, the organization declared its main goals: “expulsion of any colonial institutions from Lebanon”, “bringing Christian Phalangists to account for their crimes”, And “establishment of Islamic order in the country.”
Faith for life and death
Despite the fact that Shiites make up only about 10% of the total number of Muslims, they represent a serious political force, especially in the Middle East. Today, adherents of the two main sects of Islam are in a state of constant hostility with each other.
For example, according to research center Pew Research, 40% of Sunnis believe that Shiites are not true Muslims. And in Pakistan, Shiites are oppressed to the same extent as Christians and Hindus, calling them “collaborators of infidels.” According to Human Rights Watch, about 400 Shiites were killed in the country in 2012, and subsequently the number of victims increased significantly - 165 people were killed in January 2013 alone.
In this regard, in countries ruled by Sunni dynasties, uprisings of Shiites regularly break out with demands to increase their legal status in the life of the country. An example of this is, in particular, the recent events in Bahrain. There, the Sunni dynasty regularly persecutes the Shiite opposition, and the Minister of Internal Affairs of Bahrain once said that the country’s police forces detained large group people suspected of being part of a terrorist group linked to Iran. By the way, the United States is providing great assistance to the Bahraini authorities in pacifying the Shiites, since the largest base of the fifth navy- and the Shiite majority strongly opposes this presence...
However, the authorities are trying to influence not only with the stick, but also with the “carrot”. Thus, at the same time as Bahrain, Shiite protests also took place in Kuwait (February 2011), where 30% of the country’s residents are Shiites. Demonstrators accused the ruling dynasty of huge spending on the royal family. The protesters were also angry about their powerless situation. In order to prevent unrest, the Sunni authorities of the country urgently allocated ten thousand dollars to each indigenous citizen of the country, and also raised wages employees of all state enterprises...
But most of all, the Shiite revolution threatens Saudi Arabia. In fact, since the spring of 2011 the country has been on the verge of a religious civil war, because here Shiites are discriminated against in almost all spheres of society. Back in 1927, under pressure from the Wahhabis, King Inb Saud issued the famous fatwa, according to which Shiites had to convert to the Sunni faith or leave the country. Those who remained essentially turned into powerless slaves of the Wahhabis.
However, Riyadh is convinced that behind the Shiite discontent are solely the intrigues of Tehran, which allegedly “ seeks to undermine the foundations of the ruling Al-Saud regime and ignite a wave of separatism in areas densely populated by local Shiites.” According to Saudi Arabia, Iran's ultimate goal is to capture the Saudi eastern province, which is not only home to many Shiites, but is also very rich in oil.
In the fight against Shiite Iran, the Saudi Arabian authorities are persistently seeking to enlist the support of the United States and Israel. The Saudi rulers have more than once provoked Israel to strike Iran. According to political scientist Vladimir Efimov, “The Saudis' enmity with Iran is not due to political, oil, nuclear or regional issues. The Saudis fear that Islam, as interpreted by the leader of the Islamic Republic, will reveal the hypocrisy and lies of Wahhabism as a sectarian doctrine on which the power of the Al-Sauds rests.”
According to the expert, the Shiites of the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia can rebel at any moment and, uniting with neighboring Shiite diasporas, create a large state entity on the Arabian Peninsula, very friendly to Iran. The political scientist associates the unresolved Shiite issue, first of all, with the resistance of Wahhabi theologians, who excluded the appointment of Shiite jurists to the Council of Supreme Ulema and the Saudi vision of Iran as a strategic adversary. In his opinion, entry into Saudi society will become possible if this situation changes radically. “But for this, Riyadh needs to integrate the Shiites into the country’s socio-political system without any discrimination and stop blaming Tehran for all the internal ills of the Saudi kingdom,”- the expert believes.
USA as a threat to any stability
On the other hand, orientalist Vladimir Dergachev believes, the surge in Shiite protests was largely provoked by American policy in the region. Just like in Iraq, where after the occupation the United States relied on supporting the Shiites oppressed by Saddam Hussein, putting them in power in the country. This kind of American “democratization” of the Middle East greatly inspired the Shiites of Bahrain, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, pushing them to new actions.
However, Iraq is rather an exception to American policy. For the pro-Iranian Shiite axis today is mainly supported by China, Russia and countries hostile to NATO or America, for example, Latin American states and Cuba. The West, represented primarily by the United States, supports the Islamist Sunni axis, which is directed against Syria, its Iranian allies and Hezbollah. Alexandre del Val, a recognized geopolitician, formerly of France Soir, and lecturer in international relations at the University of Metz, explains why today the West does not consider it necessary to rely (like Iraq) on Shia movements opposed to Salafism or on secular minorities (such as the Alawites in Syria and Alevis in Turkey), as well as to protect the rights of Shia minorities in countries Persian Gulf and Pakistan or Christians in the East, who are also persecuted in all Sunni countries.
“The West today is driven only by oil and short-term interests, for the sake of which it continues to make deals with the powers of Sunni fanatics (Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Kuwait, etc.) and gives in to all their obscurantist and neo-imperialist demands. He never criticized or tried to hinder the achievement of the goal set by these states: the conquest (re-Islamization) of all Muslim countries with the subsequent Islamization of the West by financing (with the blessing of the NATO states still convinced of the reality of the Russian threat) radical Islamist associations that fight against the values of " infidel countries and the integration of Muslim minorities into their society,”- the expert believes...
... Thus, it becomes obvious that the confrontation between Sunnis and Shiites plays a huge role in the political processes taking place in the East today. But, unfortunately, instead of seeking a compromise between the two currents of Islam, the West is only encouraging division in the Muslim community. Yes, today this makes it possible to control the energy resources of the rich countries of the Persian Gulf, as well as to use their military forces in the fight for their geopolitical interests. However, in the long term, such a policy could lead to an uncontrollable regional explosion.
This is exactly what we are seeing in full today in Iraq. The Sunni “Army of Iraq and the Levant” was actually created several years ago by the intelligence services of the United States and Saudi Arabia. The goal is to direct this “Army” against the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad, and at the same time remove Iraqi terrorists from the country. For this reason, the leader of these extremists, Abu Bakr Baghdadi, who headed the “Army,” was even released from an American prison.
The Americans and Saudis did not skimp on supporting extremists while they were fighting in Syria. However, over time, Bashar al-Assad’s troops inflicted a number of heavy defeats on the “Army of Iraq and the Levant.” And then the “Army” rushed into pro-American Iraq to establish the dominance of radical Islam here. It is noteworthy that the “Army” today is fighting with the weapons that the CIA generously supplied it with during the Syrian conflict...
In a word, the story with al-Qaeda, nurtured with American money and becoming the most formidable enemy of the United States, was repeated almost exactly. The Americans thereby “sowed” another big conflict in the Middle East, and no one will say today how it will end.
Yulia Chmelenko, specially for the “Ambassadorship Prikaz”
Another piece of news from Western business tycoons caused a response attack of nausea. On American television, Stepan (Stephen) Rockefeller said that World War III is inevitable. Someone may be indignant: “Styopa, the Holocaust is not enough for you?!” That's the point; for businessmen, death alone is not enough. Rockefeller's orders are clearly readable, although they are camouflaged under " expert assessments": "The current situation reminds me of the situation that existed at the beginning of the 20th Century before the First World War. We see two alliances of powerful states (USA, EU and Russia, China, Iran) that strive for dominance and do not want to yield to each other. Never in history has anything like this ended peacefully. I am sure there will be a Third World War." Rockefeller spoke about previous methods of influencing the USSR as follows: “Current Russia is absolutely unlike the USSR. Soviet Union consisted of republics that could be pushed to secede, explaining that it would be better to live alone. Which is exactly what happened. But let’s speak objectively, the majority of the population of these republics did not live better, so I believe that separatist sentiments in Russia are doomed to failure.” This makes me happy. But Rockefeller’s final message is still quite clear and unambiguous: “You need to negotiate with the Russians, or there will be war. I believe that it will not be possible to reach an agreement.” A world war is a huge undertaking. Careless “experts” believe that such wars are supposedly fought over resources (natural resources). Let’s laugh together at such “experts,” because all resources have long been conquered by one single clan on the planet - the Romanov-Windsor-Hohenzollern-Habsburg clan, etc. (See “Who is fighting the war? The alignment of world forces”). This is a single royal family that rules the entire planet Earth. From now on, we will call them after the German Nicholas II we are accustomed to – “Romanovs” (see “From Religion to the Federal Reserve System: Who Controls the World”). There is no other clan alternative to the Romanov clan on the planet. The German Romanovs took power over the Earth as a result of the world war of 1857 - 1957, before the German Alexander II opened the borders Russian Empire, and then migrants (mostly Jews and other peoples of color) slaughtered the color of the Russian people, establishing their power (see “To whom Tsar Alexander II gave Russian gold”). In my book “Turn of the Moon” (2016), I described in detail how and who carried out revolutionary politics in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century, and showed that all these revolutionaries who threw dust of “independence” into the eyes of the people, in fact, at the very first year of their dictatorship, they sold off Russian property to Western vultures. The first dollar billionaire to rise from the mountain of the Russian people was Tsarevich Alexey - Alexey Kosygin (see “Fed gold found: face to face with Kosygin”). In the 20s of the 20th century, he led the London concession, which exported 97 percent of metals and precious stones . Later, the prince was received by the presidents of the countries, and even the Queen of Great Britain Elizabeth II herself. It was with Kosygin that the collapse of the USSR began. This was the planned slaughter of the country. Some comrades are accustomed to seeing Nicholas II and the Romanovs in general as the true kings of Russia. I do not try to convince such comrades: someone who is accustomed to licking the boots of a foreign army will no longer be able to tear off his tongue. But young people, not yet saturated with the fictions of various khaganates, must understand that the truth is that Russia should be a free and independent country, and the Romanovs would continue to rule the Germans and Israel - the Turkic khaganates. Rice. Rothschild coat of arms. In my book "The Metaphysics of Power" I showed that the Rothschilds and Rockefellers are the main servants of the Romanov sea otter, and together these three forces make up the RPP triumvirate: the Rothschilds - lit. “Red Power” – controls armies and gold. Rockefellers - lit. “Fields of the Dead” – control religions and oil. Romanovs - lit. “Masters of the border (Romans)” - control the wars between armies and religions, as well as the money raised in these wars. The picture shows the coat of arms of the Rothschild group. On this coat of arms, what I said above is written in the official hieroglyphic letter. At the top left is depicted Koschey in the form of a dragon - the owner of the Killing Fields (Champs Elysees). At the top right and diagonally, Perun’s hand with a beam of lightning is depicted - this is the symbolism of the Army. Below on the right is a red (killing) dragon of the Romanov coat of arms. The red (military) shield of the Rothschilds is placed in the center. Officially, the Rockefellers do not have their own coat of arms. But with their power they cover the entire NIZ, all the Lower Lands. The Rockefellers control blacks, Novgorodians, Neapolitans, Norwegians, etc. All these designations have the same meaning - “bottom”. Otherwise, the Lower Lands are called the patrimony of Koshchei - this is Kazan, Cossacks, Kazakhstan, Khazaria, the Caucasus, etc. And here the root is common. It means the name – “Kosh (Koshchey)”. The Rothschilds are an army, the Red Army. These are the warriors of Hell (Hebrew hell - “red”). These are the destroyers of Rus'. Their coat of arms depicts a red shield, or shield, which means army "power". The World War is a mythological action between the Black House of Rockefeller and the Red House of Rothschild. This war is always controlled only by the kings-kings-emperors - from the house of the Romanovs. Their goal in the war is money, the rise of new fabulous wealth. Both the conquerors and the vanquished always end up in debt to the Romanovs. The first - for the supplied weapons, the second - also for the supplied weapons. World wars - the First, the Second, and the escalating Third - are commercial events on a planetary scale, through which the people achieve the maximum return of funds in favor of the Romanov clan. In peacetime, people work at a slow pace, and it is impossible to collect excess profits from them. But in war time, under pain of death, people work hard not for wages, but for life, and the organizers of the World War - the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and Romanovs - receive from the warring people everything that can be squeezed out of them. That is why Stepan (Stephen) Rockefeller does not want to negotiate with the Russians - he needs war, battle, massacre. And the spirit of this massacre is a biblical entity called GOD (lit. “fighter; one who hits; killer), and therefore the Abrahamic religions teach to FEAR God (see “The Real God Found. This is the Book”). Nowadays, the Rothschild, Rockefeller and Romanov clans are not national entities, although initially they were such. The Rothschilds are the name of the Russian people, the red, fair-haired people and rulers - the Rurikovichs, rearranged in the Jewish manner. The Rockefellers were various khans, hagans and other rulers of the colored peoples located around Rus' - Germans, Turks, Semites, French, Scandinavians, Finno-Ugrians, southern Italians, Spaniards, etc. That is why throughout the history of planet Earth there has been and continues to be a war between the only white the people – the Russians – and the rest of the colored peoples of the planet (see “The Bilderbergers will set fire to the Reichstags until the whole world burns”). The Romanovs are a new formation. They arose from the 16th century as a caste of Jewish moneylenders and rose through monetary transactions associated with wars (see “There Was No Sun Before the 16th Century?”). In every war, especially World War II, moneylenders raise huge financial resources , which immediately invest in war-torn nations - buying up corrupt post-war elites, dilapidated economies, starving people. This achieves total control over the next conquered country. And it doesn’t matter to the Romanov clan who won and who lost in this war: both sides take loans from the same bankers to conduct hostilities, mortgaging their own countries as collateral. The Rothschilds and Rockefellers, financed by the Romanovs, are playing a global game. First, they sell fabulous loans to one country or another to achieve some kind of economic “breakthrough.” Then, through international fraud, they make it impossible to fulfill obligations on issued loans. These violations lead to increased international tension. After this, the RRR clans heat up the international situation to such an intensity that a World War breaks out. This is what gives the RRR clans the greatest benefits. It is historically attested that the personal arsonist, or the trigger of the World War, is necessarily a person from the Jewish community (Kagala). This is not happening at all because there is a negative trend on a national basis, but because this is the job of this “national” characteristic: to set fire to the war and warm its hands on it. You don’t have to look far for examples. In Russia in 1991, during the “putsch”, a team of Israeli snipers “accidentally” ended up in Moscow and worked on the civilian population from the roofs of buildings located on Novy Arbat (nos. 21, 19, etc.). Not a single “b****” from the Russian special services stood up to defend the Motherland. And all because by that time these “b****s” were already working for independent Israel and were also interested in the destruction of the USSR. It was the employees of the USSR special services who received the largest pieces from the carcass of the USSR they killed, and the enterprises of the Rockefellers, Rothschilds and Romanovs received complete freedom of action in territory that was previously not particularly friendly to them. I don’t say “hostile”, because the Soviet regime was also installed artificially - by the same Rothschilds under the control of the same Romanovs. Another example is Ukraine. And there, during the attack of Maidanism, Israeli snipers worked against the civilian population. And again, not a single “b****” spoke out against them. As a result, Israel gained complete control over Ukraine and is pursuing a policy of genocide of the Russian population. At the heart of the confrontation between the Red Russian people and the Black Turkic-European cluster of peoples is a fundamental difference in mentality. White and colored people only look a little alike in appearance, but the structure of their thinking and psyche is fundamentally different. There should be no comparison based on the principle of “better” or “worse.” Here you just need to state that these differences are cardinal. They are the same in structure as the differences between negative and positive electric charges. Which annihilate upon contact. Today it is becoming clear that official history, propagated to the masses by official authorities, is as far from the truth as darkness is from light. We will not go deeper than the 19th century, but will pay attention to its middle and end. It was then, in 1857, that the colored peoples went to war with the First World War. Russian state– which in those years was the only one on Earth. Actually, that’s why this war is called the First World War. She was the FIRST. My colleagues and I spent a long time discussing the question: why was the First World War the first war? And we came to the only conclusion that can be deduced from the entire complex of data at our disposal. Our conclusion is that only in the First World War did the colored peoples acquire a large number of warriors sufficient to attack Rus'. In former years the colored states were few in number. If you follow official statistics, the Chinese, Japanese and other South Asian peoples did not exist until the mid-19th century (see “93 percent of the world's population are clones?”; “Clones go on the offensive: China doubles its population”). There were no blacks, and there were also a small variety of Cossacks, Tatars, French, Spaniards, English, Germans, Americans, etc. Only to mid-19th century, all these peoples were able to reach enormous numbers and, using them, attack Russia. The problem of the sudden appearance of the British, French and other European peoples is explained by their resettlement in the 19th century from the territories of Mongoloid settlement Turkic peoples– Eastern Volga region, Siberia. That is why the British intelligence Mi-6 is pushing forward the “Tartaria” project that arose in the 19th century (the former homeland of the British, Germans and other Turks of modern Europe). But the situation with China and Southeast Asia in general is completely different. Completely inexplicable demographic processes took place here in the 19th century. The population of the region increased by leaps and bounds several dozen times. Naturally, it was impossible to achieve such a leap by any efforts of Asian women, but the phenomenon took place. And its mechanism is completely different. IN South-East Asia in the 19th century, a plant for the production of biorobots (clones) began operating. These are modern Chinese, Japanese, etc. If you look at them through the eyes of a person of that time, it was impossible to call them people. Too obvious for person XIX centuries there was a difference. That is why representatives of the south were often hunted and consumed as food. The Europeans had no idea that they were hunting people. This state of affairs lasted until the 50s of the 20th century, when throughout Europe there were human zoos that housed entire families of exhibits of the Mongoloid, Negroid and Semitic-Arab types. This was a common reality in Europe at that time. It is confirmed by numerous photographs available on the Internet. Today it looks wild. We will not discuss this point; we will return to the production of clones. It is not difficult to produce huge quantities of Asian biological machines. Genetic technologies were developed and were already well enough in the 19th century to produce individuals with given parameters. But the problem was how to resettle these individuals among ordinary people? The World War was and is the best mechanism for such resettlement. When trouble befalls people, they no longer distinguish between friends and strangers. For people, any creature in trouble requires help and care. Therefore, if suddenly, at a time when EVERYONE KNOWS that there is a war going on, some strange people turn up in villages and cities who do not look like the indigenous inhabitants, then EVERYONE becomes CLEAR that these are refugees. The indigenous population accepts the introduced clones in this way and, out of considerations of human compassion, receives a mortal enemy deep in their rear. During the First World War, the first batch of Asian clones was introduced, during the Second World War- second batch. The number of introduced clones reaches 6.5 billion (they did not exist 150 years ago). Today millions of refugees are coming to Europe - this is the Third World War and the third batch of clones. To an ordinary person it is clear that these are not refugees at all, because not a single one normal person will not leave his home and go with or without children to God knows where. Moreover, there is no war in Asia. Everything “military” is a hoax played out by the RRR clan according to its anti-human notes. A little earlier, more than 20 million Asian clones were introduced into Russia under the guise of labor migrants. Today they have taken away the remaining jobs from the local population and represent an extremely dangerous army stationed in our country and ready to rise at the first order from the cloning center. For those who doubt that in the 19th and 20th centuries, human cloning technologies were possible on such a scale, let me explain. Cloning, or the release of specific biorobots, is not a magical process at all. Today, ALL the food in our stores is made from genetic robots. We just call them by a different word – “genetically modified”. And in previous centuries mutants were bred by conventional means - by mating with the right objects in the right proportions. All pets are obtained this way. We are simply accustomed to this and do not notice that we are surrounded by biorobots that Nature did not give birth to, but we ourselves gave birth to. If in ancient times they could produce a mule, what could prevent the breeders of that time from obtaining a certain mixture of a person with various other materials in the same way? Nowadays, both Europe and Russia are flooded with “refugees” and “ labor migrants", which are controlled from one center and prepared specifically for the massacre. This is evidenced by the totality of crimes that they carry out in Europe and Russia. And the victim peoples forcibly continue to consider them, “refugees,” as “victims.” Obviously, the operation to accumulate clones is coming to an end, which is why Stepan (Stephen) Rockefeller began talking about it on air. that it was time to start the Third World War. Everything is ready, they say. The great slaughter of the RRR clan awaits the destined cattle and promises them a kosher death. Even twenty years ago we would have had to put an end to this place, because there was no salvation from the indicated fate. But today everything has changed, a new time has come. MONEY ceased to be the main operator, and with it the power of the Romanovs and their servants - the Rothschilds and Rockefellers - turned into decay. Even Federal backup system(The Federal Reserve System) - the only plant for issuing world money - has ceased to exist since 2014 (see “The Federal Reserve System is a dead man with tenacious hands”). The RRR clan does not know its enemy. And he is stronger. It is enough to recall only how in June 2015, that is, already at next year after the cessation of the legal activities of the Federal Reserve System, a certain THIRD FORCE literally killed the three heads of these three clans - David Rothschild, David Rockefeller and Yevgeny Primakov (see “Death mowed down Rockefeller, Rothschild, Primakov”). Until now, the executed clique has not been able to recover from the blow. Primakov was buried, but for more than a year there has been no word about Rothschild and Rockefeller, either as living or as dead. Representatives of the RPP clan - the Pope and Queen Elizabeth II - began publicly calling for the end of the world at the end of 2015 (see “The Pope on Humanity’s Last Christmas”; “Queen Elizabeth II: “Enjoy Your Last Christmas””). But, in my opinion, they are in a hurry. The victory of the Romanovs will not take place. The only way out of this situation for humanity is visible only in the fact that the existence of clones is officially declared, and also that the differences between people and clones are enshrined in law. Otherwise, humanity will become extinct as a species. By escalating the Third World War, the Rockefellers and Rothschilds are achieving exactly this. But for some reason there is CONFIDENCE that the representatives of these three clans will end up faster than they can carry out their evil plans. Andrey Tyunyaev, editor-in-chief of the President newspaper.
American “hawks” in the US government still achieved a positive result in the issue of providing military weapons to Ukraine. ABC News learned that the American leader should soon approve a program for the sale of anti-tank weapons. The total amount of “help” will be 210 anti-tank missiles and 35 missile launchers. A total of $47 million is allocated for defense assistance. If Trump approves the plan, the document will go to Congress for approval and then enter into force in the coming days. In turn, Senator John McCain, a supporter of providing military assistance to Ukraine, believes that providing Ukraine with Javelin anti-tank missile systems will create reliable conditions for defense security. On the website named after himself, he shared his vision of providing “help” to Ukraine. “On President Trump's decision to provide Javelin anti-tank missiles to Ukraine marks another important step in the right direction and sends a strong signal that the United States will stand with its allies and partners in the fight to defend its own sovereignty and territorial integrity,” McCain wrote. Senator McCain is known for his Russophobic views, so he is not at all embarrassed by his statement that Vladimir Putin is “undermining stability in Ukraine” and therefore “Ukraine needs protection from further Russian aggression, which will contribute to the creation of stable security conditions, which is necessary for the peaceful resolution of this conflict.” .It is still not clear what kind of peaceful settlement the American politician had in mind when he rejoiced at the supply of such a huge amount of military weapons to the Ukrainian state? But McCain is convinced that “providing defense assistance to Ukraine will not contradict peace in Ukraine.” The US State Department is of the same opinion. The State Department says the arms aid to Ukraine is an attempt by the United States to “deter further aggression” by Russia. In addition, the American department stated that the United States will send “enhanced defense potential” to the Ukrainian state. They just didn’t explain what kind of “defense potential” we are talking about. It is known that the Ukrainian leadership has been recent years constantly begs America for Javelin anti-tank weapons and “lethal military assistance.” Petro Poroshenko said in this regard that “American weapons are not for offensive”, but for “protecting civilians” and effective self-defense in accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter. 2This is also a transatlantic vaccination against the Russian virus of aggression,” he wrote on his Facebook page. According to the latest data from the Geneva Center for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) and the Stockholm International Peace Institute (SIPRI), Ukraine ranks first in the number of civilian casualties from anti-tank mines. These weapons not only kill people, but cause damage to agriculture and infrastructure. The ATO headquarters has repeatedly stated that it will take 5-10 years to clear the Donbass mines. But as we see, the Ukrainian authorities are not concerned about such figures. Just as they are not worried by the fact that after the supply of American weapons there will be much more casualties in the east of the country, and the resolution of the conflict will drag on for more than one year. Earlier, the Head of the People's Militia of the LPR M. Filiponenko stated that weapons from America will “lead to an escalation of the conflict in the southeast of the country." He believes that these weapons will be directed by the Ukrainian army, including against civilians. The Russian side is also concerned. Politicians say that American government“crossed the line” and “incites war.” We have to agree with this.
