For two months, Dmitry Shepelev has been testing stars with a lie detector in the show “Actually.” TV viewers received the project with a bang, Shepelev’s ratings are good, which means that the “Actually” team competently selects and builds the dramaturgy of the TV show.
True, guests are not always happy with what happens behind the scenes “In reality”.
the site publishes the star behind the scenes of the TV project.
1. Singer Aziza participated in the release of the program, which was dedicated to the death of Igor Talkov. Dmitry Shepelev, with the help of guests in the studio, tried to understand the details of the tragedy that happened on October 6, 1991 at the Yubileiny Sports Palace in St. Petersburg. When the show’s experts asked Aziza in the finale of “Actually” what she was keeping silent about, the artist replied that she was honest. Although the polygraph determined that she was not speaking. “Aziza has information that she is hiding, but which was not asked,” the experts said. Aziza tried to justify herself, and the presenter concluded that the case of Igor Talkov remained unsolved.
In an interview after recording the TV project, Aziza said: “I personally don’t care about the polygraph. Moreover, all this is profanity and show. Both the presenter and the experts play roles in a well-directed production. Igor Talkov Jr. asked me to come there, we are friends, and I came. But for some reason he was never called to the studio. This is disrespect not even for Igor, but for the memory of his father.”
2. Few people believe Nikita Dzhigurda, so he recorded all his conversations with the editors of the television project and then partially made them public. From telephone conversation showman with a representative of the program, you can clearly hear the phrase: “They want to call you to the detector, write everything down...” But Dzhigurda refuses: “I don’t want to be a whipping boy...”
Despite his scandalousness, Dzhigurda communicates with celebrities, including those who participated in “Actually.” “A script is written in advance, to which the answers that editors need for ratings and earning money are tailored to... They don’t care about truth and truth! “People eat” - that means (from their point of view) everything is cool! And they don’t give a damn about crippled destinies!” — the TV show Dzhigurda emotionally exposes. Who else but Dzhigurda and Anisina (frequent guests of scandalous TV shows) knows that the show often prescribes topics of conversation in advance, sometimes discusses the answers, edits...
3. The singer Danko’s common-law wife, according to his confession, was paid 150 thousand rubles for participating in “Actually.” In a conversation with a reporter for the site, Danko talked about the behind-the-scenes of the TV show: “...I was given the role of a bastard, I played it. I spoke clearly from the text; such a thing could not have occurred in my head. Invented foreigners who even technically cannot exist - Natasha’s passport does not contain any exits or entries, except for hospitals. (The program discussed in detail the possible infidelities of Danko’s wife - editor’s note.) And what questions did they shove in?! Moreover, at first they agreed on some, and then last moment others slipped it in."
The main complaint because of which Danko decided to make public the behind-the-scenes of the TV project was the fact that the editors who invited the singer to the broadcast did not fulfill their obligations: “They promised to give the card number on the air, to announce the collection of money - I don’t know by what methods. But the emphasis was on this. We had to agree to their “jaundice” in order to help the child: we need a lot…” The youngest daughter Danko (Sasha Fadeeva) is disabled, the child has several serious diagnoses, so money for treatment is constantly needed.
4. Diana Shurygina turned 18 years old and was able to pass a polygraph test, although no sensations happened on air. The imminent wedding (October 5) of Diana and the Channel One cameraman was already known at that time. Previously, Diana Shurygina’s fees for participating in a talk show were announced (200 thousand rubles per program).
Diana Shurygina’s opponent on air was the sister of Sergei Semenov, convicted of rape, Ekaterina. This is what she said immediately after recording the program: “Before going into the studio, we were tested on a detector. When Diana passed, we sat in the next room and heard her answers that it was true and that it was false. Throughout the program, she constantly avoided answering. Then she started a game: “I remember, I don’t remember.” When it’s convenient, I remember, when it’s not, I don’t know, I don’t remember. Either she could walk or she was unconscious. When the experts got tired of her leading them by the nose, they asked for accurate answers. To which she, in her usual style, began to throw a tantrum, tear off the wires from the detector and leave. The organizers, realizing that the filming was on the verge of failure, began to ask the experts to be loyal to Diana and stop pressuring her. After this, answers in the form: “I don’t remember, I don’t know, maybe” began to be accepted and in the end it turned out that everything she said was true. Diana's happiness knew no bounds, she tried to show that she was crying, actually covered her face and laughed, which she was able to deceive. Later, the organizers said, we need a “swing” - Seryozha is right, Diana is right, in order to maintain the interest of the audience and raise the rating of the program. The filming lasted 4 hours; it is unknown what will be left there after editing. Just so you understand, the script was written long before we took the polygraph.”
5. Polygraph - technical means for conducting psychophysiological studies, in which parameters of breathing and cardiovascular activity are simultaneously recorded. Is the machine always right?
Our question was answered by star psychologist Evgeniy Voltov: “On many projects, I studied the results of lie detector research and I can say with confidence that the polygraph gives flaws. Honesty to the heroes of the “Actually” program is enhanced by responsibility to the audience federal channel, and the graphics on the screen are more likely to build up intrigue. Don't forget: this is a show, not documentary. And then, imagine a situation in which the detector made a mistake. A person would ask to double-check this! This is a natural reaction to being accused of lying!”
For two months now, Dmitry Shepelev has been hosting the show “Actually”. According to the project, the stars and other participants are tested on a lie detector. At the transmission high ratings, however, guests complain that there are a lot of lies in the Channel One show.
Thus, singer Aziza participated in one of the program’s episodes. The issue was dedicated tragic death Igor Talkov. At the very end, the show experts asked Aziza what she was keeping silent about, to which the artist replied that she was honest. However, according to the polygraph, it turned out that she did not finish speaking.
Aziza has information that she is hiding, but which was not asked,”experts reported.
Aziza tried to justify herself, but Shepelev eventually concluded that the case of Igor Talkov remained unsolved.
I personally don’t care about the polygraph. Moreover, all this is profanity and show. Both the presenter and the experts play roles in a well-directed production. Igor Talkov Jr. asked me to come there, we are friends, and I came. But for some reason he was never called to the studio. This is disrespect not even for Igor, but for the memory of his father,” Aziza shared her impressions. Her words are quoted by “TV Program”.
Nikita Dzhigurda, who recorded all his conversations with the editors of the television project, was also dissatisfied with the organization of the show. In particular, they called the artist and said: “They want to call you to the detector, register everything...”, but Dzhigurda refused.
“I don’t want to be a whipping boy...”he declared.
It is known that the showman communicates with those stars who participated in the “Actually” program.
A script is written in advance, to which the answers that editors need for ratings and earning money are tailored to... They don’t care about truth and truth! “People eat” - that means (from their point of view) everything is cool! And they don’t give a damn about crippled destinies!” - stated Dzhigurda.
Singer Danko also spoke about the intricacies of constructing the program. According to him, he had to play a role. According to the singer, his common-law wife was paid 150 thousand rubles for participating in the project, and Danko himself in the studio spoke strictly according to the text compiled by the editors. In that program, we recall, it was about his wife’s infidelities.
They gave me the role of a bastard, and I played it. I spoke clearly according to the text; such a thing could not have occurred in my head. Invented foreigners who even technically cannot exist - Natasha’s passport does not contain any exits or entries, except for hospitals. And what kind of questions did they shove in?! And at first they agreed on some, and at the last moment they slipped in others,” the singer said.
As a result, according to Danko, the editors did not fulfill their obligations, although they promised a lot.
They promised to give the card number on air, to announce the collection of money - I don’t know by what methods. But the emphasis was on this. I had to agree to their “jaundice” in order to help the child: we need a lot..." added the singer.
Danko’s youngest daughter was born with developmental disabilities, so money for her treatment is constantly needed.
The well-known Diana Shurygina also passed a polygraph test. For participation in television projects they pay 200 thousand rubles each. Diana Shurygina’s opponent in the “Actually” program was the sister of Sergei Semenov, convicted of rape, Ekaterina.
Semenova believes that what Diana said was a lie, but was passed off as the truth, despite the polygraph.
Before going into the studio, we were tested on a detector. When Diana passed, we sat in the next room and heard her answers that it was true and that it was false. Throughout the program, she constantly avoided answering. Then she started a game: “I remember, I don’t remember.” When it’s convenient, I remember, when it’s not, I don’t know, I don’t remember. Either she could walk or she was unconscious. When the experts got tired of her leading them by the nose, they asked for accurate answers. To which she, in her usual style, began to throw a tantrum, tear off the wires from the detector and leave,” said the sister of a man convicted of rape.
It is noted that the organizers of the shooting were afraid that the program would not be able to be aired because of this, and asked the experts to be loyal to Diana.
After this, answers in the form: “I don’t remember, I don’t know, maybe” began to be accepted and in the end it turned out that everything she said was true. Diana's happiness knew no bounds, she tried to show that she was crying, actually covered her face and laughed, which she was able to deceive. Later, the organizers said, we need a “swing” - Seryozha is right, Diana is right, in order to maintain the interest of the audience and raise the rating of the program... So you understand, the script was written long before we passed the polygraph,” Semenova added.
According to experts, a lie detector may not always give reliable results. It is a device with which psychophysiological studies are carried out, during which parameters of breathing and cardiovascular activity are simultaneously recorded.
On many projects I studied the results of lie detector tests and I can say with confidence that the polygraph produces flaws. The honesty of the heroes of the “Actually” program is enhanced by their responsibility to the audience of the federal channel, and the graphics on the screen are more likely to increase intrigue,” – said star psychologist Evgeny Voltov.
He noted that we're talking about about the show, not the documentary.
And then, imagine a situation in which the detector made a mistake. A person would ask to double-check this! This is a natural reaction to being accused of lying!” said Voltov.
Name: Sabina Pantus
Date of Birth: 26.07.1982
Age: 36 years
Place of Birth: Moscow city, Russia
Activity: polygraph examiner, profiler, coach
Family status: Single
Polygraph examiner, coach and business trainer Sabina Pantus became famous after filming the program “Actually”. There, together with Dmitry Shepelev, she lifts the veil of secrecy over the secrets of domestic celebrities. What is known about the biography and personal life Sabina Pantus, read our article.
Curriculum Vitae
The biographical information about Sabina Pantus, available to Internet users, raises some doubts about its veracity. The sources available for viewing indicate different ages girls. Only a few resources agree that Sabina Pantus was born in 1982 in Baku. Some sources indicate that she was born in the Baltic states. Sabina has a rather unusual first and last name. Pantus is an atypical surname for Russia, most likely foreign.
The girl does not look like an Azerbaijani. Many people find something Estonian in her appearance. According to some sources, Sabina Pantus is still Russian by nationality, but perhaps not purebred.
Recently, the girl radically changed her image - she dyed her hair a different color. TV viewers are sure that this is how Sabina began to look much younger.
Sabina Pantus gained popularity from filming the program “Actually”. It is known that before the girl received an invitation to take part as a co-host of Dmitry Shepelev, she conducted more than three thousand printing checks.
In addition, she has experience as a recruiter. The girl helped various companies find employees based on the requirements they described. Sabina Pantus has helped various organizations conduct internal investigations against their employees.
Education
Her education deserves special attention in the biography of Sabina Pantus (find information about the girl’s personal life below). It is unknown in what year Sabina received her first diploma. If she was born in 1982, then most likely she graduated from university in the early 2000s.
Sabina Pantus improved her qualifications in the following areas:
- in neuro-linguistic programming;
- profiling;
- psychodiagnostics and polygraphology.
Sabina Pantus professional polygraph examiner
Among educational institutions, where Pantus received certificates confirming her qualification level, it is worth noting the following:
- Business Security Academy.
- Center for Applied Psychophysiology.
- Moscow Humanitarian University.
- International Academy of Lies.
- Center for linguistic neuroprogramming.
- American international institute printing.
Certificates issued by well-known institutes and universities helped Sabina find herself as a polygraph profiler, as well as a business trainer and personal coach.
Sabina at her workplace
Personal life of a famous polygraph examiner
The personal life of polygraph examiner Sabina Pantus is kept in the strictest confidence by the girl herself, as is her biography.
It is known that she has two sons. The eldest is 12 years old, the youngest is 7 years old (some sources indicate that youngest child Sabina is 8 years old). The guys' names are Nikita and Daniel.
Sabina claims that her ability to “read” a person has a detrimental effect on her relationships with children. She always guesses when boys are lying and when they are telling the truth. The sons never manage to hide anything from her. Sabina always takes them to clean water. Of course, she does not use a polygraph at home. It is enough for her to observe the verbal and non-verbal communication of the guys to make sure that they are honest or, conversely, that they are lying.
Sabina hides her personal life from everyone
Regarding the presence of the husband or young man in the life of Sabina Pantus, the girl is silent about this. It is unknown if she is currently dating someone. Perhaps, once upon a time in Sabina’s personal life there was a loved one, the result of the relationship with whom was the birth of children. It is possible that the boys have different fathers. The press was unable to find out even hints about those men who could be the fathers of Sabina Pantus’ sons.
Having become a recognizable person, Sabina does not want to be at the center of a scandal and therefore prefers not to disclose facts from her personal life. Having seen how the public reacts to the secrets of the stars in the show “Actually”, a well-known polygraph examiner on Russian television is in no hurry to reveal himself to the public.
Viewers of the TV show “Actually” are sure that a romantic relationship is developing between Sabina Pantus and Dmitry Shepelev. Famous TV presenter and the polygraph examiner has not yet confirmed these speculations.
What is known about the professional activities of Sabina Pantus?
ABOUT professional activity In her biography, Sabina Pantus knows much more than about the personal life of the girl and her husband. Sabina is the head of the Central Research Bureau of Psychotechnologies. In addition, she works as a teacher at the Korovin School of Printing.
It is also known about the professional activities of Sabina Pantus that she is a member of the European Association of Polygraph Examiners. They haven’t forgotten about Pantus in Russia either. Here Sabina's surname is included in Single register polygraph examiners.
With other experts on the set of the program “Actually”
The girl also offers consultation services at the International Academy for Lie Research, where she also works as a trainer. Sabina invested her knowledge in the field of printing into the development and optimization of a polygraph released under the name “Energy”. For those who have to undergo an interview using a polygraph, Pantus has released effective training.
For those who want to normalize relationships with their significant other and find out whether their loved one is right for them, Sabina Pantus conducts courses and master classes. She also conducts webinars, specializing in bringing self-esteem to the desired level.
Starting in July 2017, Sabina Pantus became co-host of Dmitry Shepelev in the show “Actually”. The girl analyzes the behavior of the participants and gives them professional comments. Thanks to Sabina's participation in the program, TV viewers have the opportunity to find out whether their idol is telling the truth. The polygraph examiner often criticizes those stars who try to hide any facts from their personal lives, for which they, in turn, are extremely negative towards her.
Sabina Pantus famous personality
Some TV viewers support their favorites who came to the show and criticize the hosts of the “Actually” program. Some people feel that media personalities are under pressure to talk about intimate details from his biography and personal life. Naturally, the pressure on them is primarily exerted by Sabina Pantus, who skillfully reveals the secrets of celebrities.
Another part of the TV viewers, on the contrary, are very impressed with Sabina’s work. They believe that she is truly a qualified specialist who helps restore the truth about the lives of popular Russian stars. Some people are pleased to realize that media figures Russian television not as ideal as they are portrayed in the press. After all, only on the show “Actually” they truly open up.
The scandal surrounding the program “Actually”
During the existence of the show “Actually”, viewers managed to criticize it more than once. The participants also remain dissatisfied. The heroes of the program believe that Dmitry Shepelev provokes them with his incorrect questions in order to obtain new facts about their lives. The latter subsequently become scandalous to the public.
Naturally, in discussing the show “Actually” one cannot do without negative comments about Sabina Pantus, including about her biography and personal life.
TV viewers consider it unjustified that Sabina is a secretive person who is not ready to openly tell reporters about her life. At the same time, she herself demands answers to intimate questions from the heroes of the “Actually” program.
It is worth recalling that famous people have already commented on their participation in the filming of “Actually” in a negative way. Media personalities are convinced that the questions are being asked incorrectly. The task of Dmitry Shepelev and Sabina Pantus is to bring them out into the open, pulling them out of the stars dirty details their personal life and biography.
What is the relationship between Pantus and Shepelev?
Sabina Pantus and Dmitry Shepelev are colleagues and co-hosts of the “Actually” show. TV viewers believe that the relationship between celebrities is something more than just cooperation within the framework of one program. Sabina Pantus (see photo) benefits from a discussion of her biography and personal life with a mention of Dmitry Shepelev. The girl is becoming more and more famous in the world of Russian television. It is possible that she will soon begin to be invited to other popular programs.
Viewers noted that during the filming of the show “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire,” Dmitry specifically called his colleague “You.” The girl decided to reciprocate. During filming, she tried to touch Dmitry with her shoulder or hands as often as possible.
Sabina Pantus and Dmitry Shepelev have a romantic relationship
In addition, Sabina Pantus responded to Shepelev’s scandalous case related to Rusfond and Zhanna Friske’s money. The girl managed to write and publish an entire post addressed to her colleague. So, Sabina says that the accusations are undeserved. She believes that Dmitry is exclusively fair man, which has nothing to do with Rusfond’s money. He's wonderful and loving father. She is sure that all the accusations are unfounded. This means that Dmitry is not to blame for anything.
TV viewers of the show “Actually” are sure that their colleagues film set– Sabina Pantus and Dmitry Shepelev are connected by something more than just work. Perhaps the young people managed to make friends and began to communicate closely.
Shepelev’s fans do not rule out the fact that romantic feelings are arising between colleagues. No one blames Dmitry. After the death of Zhanna Friske, enough time passed for the man to start thinking about a new relationship.
Alexandra Rachel is perhaps the most famous television expert. She began her march on talk shows back in the program " Big Wash". 17 years have passed since then - the program has already changed its name, and the presenter has left for another channel. But Alexandra is still willingly invited to comment on this or that situation, story, problem. Unlike most guests in the studio, money for their Rachel never accepted comments. And even after leaving to live in Israel, she flew to Moscow for filming. But the next invitation ended in a huge scandal.
ON THIS TOPIC
“The program “Actually” with Dmitry Shepelev was preparing an episode called “Ours in London,” Alexandra told the site. “The main character was supposed to be Marinika Smirnova, about whom I have dirty incriminating evidence. I was supposed to appear with him in Shepelev's studio."
“Editor Shamil took out my soul with calls, begged me to be on the recording, persuaded me strongly and for a long time,” noted Sasha. “They say, come, we will pay for everything.” I very reluctantly agreed to this - after plastic surgery I didn’t really want to go from the warmth into the frost and snowdrifts. But I went, which I ended up regretting very much later. For 80 thousand I bought a business class ticket for the flight Tel Aviv - Moscow. And no one met me at the airport."
“I’m coming to the shoot,” Rachel continued. “There they put me in a small dressing room, where they kept me for four hours without water or food. All this time, as I later found out, the editors were screwing Marinika. And she, thanks to the transfer, flew from England to Russia , having settled in a luxury hotel, but realizing that they wanted to make her a laughing stock throughout the country, she refused to film. For the first time in the history of the program, the heroine did not go on air. The scandal was wild! And she returned home, because her editors. They just intimidated me - they worked very unprofessionally. Although Marinika should have received about 400 thousand rubles. main character I didn’t show up to the studio, so the shooting was cancelled.”
“But the most interesting thing began later,” said Rachel. “Marinika flew to England with the money of the producers of Channel One, and no one, it seems, is going to give me money for coming to Moscow. Editor Shamil simply stopped communicating. “The situation is extremely difficult, and I’m thinking about how to get out of it,” he wrote to me. Six days have passed. And this despite the fact that the program pays all participants, much less famous than me. I asked to pay only for my travel. I’m wildly angry about this situation is just a punch in the gut!”
“Shepelev at the end of the program says: “Enough lies for today!” And the creators of the program themselves showed themselves to be completely deceitful! - Alexandra was indignant. - “In fact” - this is entirely a production and a performance. They pull everything out of thin air, they don’t deceive only TV viewers, but also, as I have already said, guests and participants. I did not expect that the management of the program would behave so vilely, especially since I did all the work for the editors of the program myself, at my own expense, even with the deputy, who filed a lawsuit against Marinika, communicated personally."
Let us remind you that the premiere of the program “Actually” took place in July 2017. The studio confronts people who were once close, but lies broke their relationship. The heroes of the program were Diana Shurygina, Anna Kalashnikova, Elina Mazur and many other public figures.
“A revolutionary talk show that helps people sort out relationships” - these were the words that Channel One presented to viewers with the program “Actually”, hosted by Dmitry Shepelev. Using a lie detector and devices that track the heroes' pulse, experts in the studio are trying to get to the bottom of the truth and solve conflict situations. Each issue is actively discussed by users. Read what they think about the new talk show in the material from AiF.ru.
Ira Bebekina Exactly a minute was enough to understand that the program was uninteresting... everything was staged, exaggerated as usual, plus editing. AND Malakhov
got blown away with his “Let them talk”, and this program will not have a high rating. “The truth and only the truth...” Yeah, lie more! When was the truth shown on TV? I don't remember.
Katerina
Dima. You are so charismatic, with such a wonderful, childish look, melodious voice. Well, why do you need all this kitchen rubbish?
Dmitry, the show is good!!! And don’t pay attention to bad and envious comments. Not everyone understands what it’s like to lose a loved one and raise your son on your own. Well done to you for being able to cope with all the difficulties and create a program. Good luck in your work to you and your team who are making the transfer with you.
Sergey Shedko
Close this show altogether, why is there such dirt on Channel One? family problems must remain within the family, to what extent do you have to stoop to delve into someone else's dirty laundry.
Anastasia Starostina
“Let them talk” is better than this garbage... especially the presenter (I don’t care about his past)...
angelochek321
I don't like the presenter. I don’t know who he is and why everyone hates him, but I just don’t like him. Uninteresting, bland, the only thing there is appearance.
O- Zone
Thank you, Dmitry. It's nice to listen to you. Don't pay attention to people's mean comments. Health to you and your family.
Inna Shmygelsky
If Channel One plans to replace Malakhov with Shepelev, the replacement will be unequal and viewers will not accept it. Malakhov is the most talented journalist and TV presenter on TV, and no one can reach his level.
Nafisa Utegenova
Shepelev does not know how to host such programs, it is very boring and uninteresting.
Olga Alexandrova
What is airtime spent on... So much worthy people lives in our country and in the world, which we will never know about... It’s all sad...
Vasilina Koshkina
“Let them talk”, this program has outlived its usefulness! This new talk show with experts in lies, it is more truthful, and the heroes try to tell the truth. I'm sure this number of views means that people are interested in watching known situations from a different angle of truth! “Actually” shows victims and executioners from different sides... Shepelev is in his place here...
Oksana Gerveliene
You know, Dmitry, you seem good, smart man, you evoke sympathy, you present the program really well, it’s pleasant to listen to you, you keep everyone under control, there is no characteristic yelling, but... give up this project so that they flash Panins And Danko. And in this case it has already become common noun from the series of Sharikovs, Plyushkins and similar literary characters.
Vera Maslova
Guys! How I like you all! No one likes the show, but we all watch to the end and write comments! Dima, well done!
