“Russia is the only country in the world capable of turning the United States into radioactive ash”
D.K. Kiselev, director of Russia Today
But is it possible for events to develop according to such a scenario? Will there be a war in 2017, will we have to take up arms in the near future and again defend our Motherland? Let's figure it out.
Looking ahead, we note that the war it's already underway, and a lot of money is spent on it. But this is not open confrontation, but war in other ways. But first things first…
To begin with, about the latest events that indicate that war between Russia and the United States in 2017 is likely
Since 2014 (when, you know who, managed to spark a conflict in Ukraine), the political life of the planet and Russia, in particular, has been replenished with many interesting events. The most important of them, of course, is the return of Crimea to the Russian Federation.
Of course, the “Western partners”, who were pursuing completely different goals and were already figuring out how the destroyers would be deployed in the port of Sevastopol, did not like this very much. And the fact that V.V. Putin and others politicians Russia reacts with unshakable calm to all sorts of attacks in our direction, which also angers its “partners.”
From latest events, saying that there is a possibility of war between Russia and the United States in 2017, the following are noteworthy:
- The latest conclusions of the international commission on MH17, and the statement of the Dutch prosecutor Fred Westerbeke, that the BUK was imported from the territory of the Russian Federation (and after the launch was safely taken back). But until now no one has bothered to obtain data from Ukrainian radars. Moreover, the members of this commission “don’t care” about the primary radar data presented by the Russian side. What does this mean? At a minimum, they are trying to blame the death of Boeing on the Russian Federation as a motive for starting a war against the “aggressor.” Why don't they untie it? More on this below.
- Statement by US representatives of their intention to cease cooperation on Syria. What does this mean? That the attempt of the “partners” to exhaust Russian troops with the campaign in Syria, and to show their low combat effectiveness, was not crowned with success. On the contrary, the Russian Armed Forces have proven that they have an army capable of not only accurately hitting targets, but also surprising (remember the missile launches from surface ships that made State Department representatives go into hysterics?).
- A hint from US State Department spokesman John Kirby that further Russian actions in Syria will provoke terrorist attacks on Russian cities. Well, it’s already clear who and how they will be coordinated. Considering the fact that, according to representatives of our Ministry of Defense, the Russian side knows the locations of American specialists providing assistance to terrorists operating in Syria (and also, do not forget about what weapons they are fighting with, which confirms the fact that the war between the USA and Russia is already underway, but not directly...).
And yet, will there be a war in 2017?
Considering the “attempts” of the United States, it can be assumed that they want war with Russia in 2017. However, a direct one-on-one conflict is impossible. Why, let's find out.
If we analyze the history of the United States, they have never participated in an open confrontation with an enemy comparable in strength to the states. America always invades weakened, "battered" countries civil war and allies, or acts as part of large coalitions, preferring to “participate with money” (as in the Second World War). Therefore, the likelihood that the United States will sharply change its views and rush into battle, unleashing a third world war in 2017, small.
If the United States starts a nuclear war in 2017, they will receive a very, very sensitive blow. And while they are recovering from it, the world order may change greatly. After all, there are contenders for the role of world leader (you know who) who are intensively growing their economy.
It is extremely inconvenient to wage a war while on another continent. Yes, the United States can use the military bases of its NATO allies for this. But how will the countries that are members of the alliance view retaliatory strikes on American bases located on their territory? Not everyone will go for such a “big brother” adventure. As they say, you can go after a bear with ten men and kill it, but it will certainly maul several of the attackers.
Experts from the American think tank Council on Foreign Relations said that the conflict between Russia and NATO countries is the main threat to the world community in 2017.
The authors of the report “Top Threats to Watch for in 2017,” which was published by the American Council on Foreign Relations, put the DPRK problem in second place. Analysts singled out “Russia’s aggressive behavior in Eastern Europe” as the reason for this distribution of places.
At the same time, in terms of the degree of threat to the world community, the North Korean crisis, which was caused by the test nuclear weapons and intercontinental ballistic missiles and military provocations are proposed to be assessed below the “threat from Russia.” The consequences of a “highly destructive cyber attack on critical American infrastructure” are also considered dangerous for the United States.
They make an enemy from Russia with such frequency and creativity that it is no longer surprising. Recently, the British military conducted exercises in which they worked out the scenario of a Russian invasion of Estonia. According to legend, Great Britain, USA and others Western countries obliged, in accordance with the treaty, to come to the defense of another NATO member.
Moreover, the alleged enemy at these maneuvers wears a uniform similar to the Russian one and uses weapons that are in service with the Russian army. As he writes Daily Mail, due to lack of funds, representatives of the civilian population and Nepalese soldiers are playing this enemy. Moreover, the supposed Russian forces carried out the attack using a model of the T-72 tank.
The UK military did not deny that the idea behind the maneuvers was to simulate “Russia’s 2014 invasion of eastern Ukraine, which included a rapid land grab that led to the annexation of Crimea.” Former NATO general Richard Shirreff called these exercises extremely important and calls the Baltic countries the “new frontier”, the same as, for example, Berlin was during the Cold War.
According to former deputy head of the CIA Morell, the tactics used by the United States in armed conflicts perfectly illustrate the goals pursued by American intelligence agencies in Syria. Morell explained that the most in an effective way resolution of the Syrian conflict will be “the secret murder of Russians and Iranians.”
US military strategists say they will be fighting a "near-peer" enemy in the next five years and need to prepare for an imaginary conflict. At the same time, the executive director of the Lexington Institute, Lauren Thompson, explains that a hypothetical war with Russia, according to the expert, will be tied to the fastest possible advance ground forces through vast spaces. Russia will simply crush NATO troops, notes a Forbes columnist.
Let us recall that earlier the same former deputy commander-in-chief of NATO in Europe Richard Shirreff told The Independent that the North Atlantic Alliance will enter into a nuclear war with Russia during 2017. The current NATO commander in Europe, General Philip Breedlove, also stated that “American soldiers are ready to fight and defeat Russia.” The man who wrote the book “War with Russia: 2017” about a hypothetical war between Europe and Moscow is sure that when the Baltics completely “strangle” the Russian-speaking population, Russia may begin sending troops into its territory.
Political scientist Stephen Cohen Lately often focuses on the fact that “the US State Department is deliberately intensifying military confrontation with Russia,” considering this “a very unwise strategy.” Such games of cold war with a nuclear power are becoming increasingly dangerous as Moscow moves heavy weapons and missile systems closer to its western borders in response to US actions.
It is the United States that is in fact preparing for a nuclear conflict, noted Leonid Ivashov. “And here the main players, of course, are not the Europeans. The main player is the Americans. In addition to the task of stopping Russia, they have a second task - to prevent Europe from getting out of US control. The Europeans, somewhere in the economy, in politics, tried to carry out an independent line, they do not want to sign the colonial Transatlantic Agreement. And in the military sphere, even the Commander-in-Chief of NATO forces in Europe is an American. So, through military obedience, they keep both politicians and businesses in Europe,” the analyst emphasized.
Currently time is running testing the build-up of US forces in the theater of operations in Eastern Europe. "The Americans may even have their own" global strike"they will not inflict, but will create an incident that will escalate into an armed conflict. And then they will shed tears that they do not want to fight, but are obliged to protect their NATO allies. It is important for them that the war is fought not on the territory of the United States, but in Europe. After all, Europe is not only their ally, but also their competitor in the economy. They need to weaken Europe, and the best way to do this is by starting a conflict with Russia in Europe,” the expert concluded.
It is worth recalling the recent statement by US Deputy Secretary of Defense Robert Work that, if necessary, Washington is ready to use nuclear weapons first. The experts' conclusion is this: thermonuclear war between Russia and the United States is close and more likely than ever - confirming the opinions of scientists who moved the "doomsday clock" to "three minutes to Armageddon."
American military strategists say that in the next five years they will have to fight a “nearly equal” enemy, meaning by “enemy”, of course, Russian army. One that is rapidly modernizing and actively regaining lost positions along Russia’s borders with Europe.
And some observers mistakenly conclude that these five years will be enough for the American army to prepare for an imaginary conflict.
But no! - Lauren Thompson, executive director of the Lexington Institute, states in her column for Forbes magazine. A hypothetical war with Russia, according to the expert, will be tied to the fastest possible advance of ground forces across vast spaces.
Defeat in this war for the American military forces is quite possible; moreover, this is the most probable outcome possible conflict.
And then the influence of the United States in Europe will be reduced to its minimum since World War II. At the same time, the geopolitical balance will change dramatically, Thompson is sure.
Several factors contribute to the likelihood of such an outcome: strategic miscalculations of previous presidents - George W. Bush and Barack Obama - and lack of funding for the armed forces.
According to the analyst, Bush Jr.'s mistake is associated with the withdrawal of two American heavy brigades from Europe, and Obama's miscalculation lies in his bet on the Asia-Pacific region, an echo of which was the reduction of the US military presence in the Old World.
Funding for the US Army, Thompson is sure, is indeed insufficient, especially when comparing modernization programs with Russian ones. The US military receives $22 billion annually from the federal budget for new weapons, while Russia has launched a ten-year rearmament program with a budget of $700 billion, with most of the funds, according to Thompson, going to the development of ground forces and aviation.
By the way, if we talk about the US military budget, then in the full sense it has long become a “barrel of Danaids”: although huge sums are allocated for the needs of the Pentagon, they are spent, to put it mildly, strangely.
The fact is that the American Congress, which must give the go-ahead for large military purchases, is filled with lobbyists from various companies that feed on government defense orders. As a result, anyone wins, but the combat effectiveness of the US Army does not increase at all.
Enough to remember famous story with the “newest and best in the world” aircraft, the F-35, which first took quite a long time to develop, and then actually proved the complete incompetence of its creators. As stated by the head of the test service, Michael Gilmore, to eliminate the identified problems, a structural modification of the aircraft will be required.
Nevertheless, Lockheed Martin, the manufacturing company, has such strong lobbyists in Congress and the Pentagon that the US Air Force's plans for the coming years include manning exclusively the F-35, as well as replacing with them the aircraft produced by competing companies. It should be noted that the development and pilot batch of the “world’s best” flying disgrace cost American taxpayers almost $400 billion.
But let's get back to Loren Thompson's material. All the arguments he mentions further convince the expert that the “European” war will most likely be lost by the American army. Thompson supports his thesis with five arguments.
First of all, Russia has a geographical advantage, the expert notes. The battles will take place in the territories of Eastern Europe, which are located further from the main landing points of the American contingent in Europe.
In addition, this part of the Old World is washed by seas that can only be entered through narrow straits that Russia can easily control.
The main argument is that the US military is woefully unprepared for such a conflict, Thompson adds. In Europe, the United States has only two stationary brigades, a light airborne unit and a cavalry regiment armed with armored Strykers. If there is no reinforcement, Russia will simply crush these troops, notes a Forbes columnist.
Recently, the White House decided to deploy a third rotational brigade in Europe, along with this it was decided to send a thousand soldiers to Poland and each of the Baltic countries, but this will not get rid of all the problems. After 15 years of fighting opponents like the Taliban (an organization banned in the Russian Federation - ed.), the US Army is still vulnerable. This applies to air defense, electronic warfare, precision weapons and insufficiently protected equipment. This is where the US Army is no match for the Russian military, Thompson concludes.
Such tragic forecasts from the mouths of American analysts, and military strategists too, are heard constantly. For example, former deputy commander-in-chief of NATO in Europe Richard Shirreff told The Independent that the North Atlantic Alliance will enter into a nuclear war with Russia during 2017. The current NATO commander in Europe, General Philip Breedlove, also stated that “American soldiers are ready to fight and defeat Russia.” The Pentagon leadership and NATO representatives also made statements about Russia as an “enemy.”
Earlier, political scientist Steven Cohen wrote that “the US State Department is deliberately intensifying military confrontation with Russia,” considering this “a very unwise strategy.” Such Cold War games with a nuclear power are becoming increasingly dangerous as Moscow moves heavy weapons and missile systems closer to its western borders in response to US actions.
I also remember the information that appeared in the media that “the combat forecasting of Operation Bear Spear, carried out by the US Strategic Command, ended in failure.” The purpose of the training was supposedly “to simulate a fast, high-precision and partial nuclear strike on Russia.” “As a result, the world found itself in ruins, and the United States (as, alas, Russia) was wiped off the face of the Earth.”
Of course, the US military is deliberately exaggerating the so-called “Russian threat” in order to obtain greater share budget allocations, and this causes bewilderment even in the Pentagon itself.
At the same time, the main alarmists are Lieutenant General Herbert McMaster, who is responsible for developing the concept of the “army of the future” in the United States, and Air Force General Philip Breedlove, who recently resigned as commander-in-chief of NATO’s Joint Armed Forces (ALLI) in Europe.
About the coming big war
Since January 2015, US preparations for an attack on Russia have become obvious.
First, let me remind you only of some of the events accompanying this preparation - combat, logistics, information. Fragmentary data collected together will help assess the scale of preparations. Then briefly about the meaning of the events happening right now.
War is a competition of organizational structures. The initial task is not the massive transfer of heavy equipment, but the deployment of headquarters and preparation of conditions for the massive deployment of troops. The question being solved is not “how much?”, but “where?” And How?". This includes a whole range of activities - familiarization of command personnel with the terrain in which they will have to fight, organization of premises for future barracks and hospitals, determination of places for storing ammunition and parking of equipment, information training of the local population - people are accustomed to the fact that armored vehicles roaming the roads is becoming commonplace In the background, the enemy is being “dehumanized” in the media and public opinion is being prepared for the inevitability of war. Etc. etc. etc.
January 2015 ("Barbarossa 2.0. Our chances in the coming war") “US European Command is preparing to send Eastern Europe so-called monitoring groups. Military experts must determine locations for tanks and other weapons. This mission is carried out as part of a large-scale strengthening of the US military presence near the borders with Russia. Writes about thisofficial publication of the Pentagon Stars and Stripes. “In the next few weeks we will send a monitoring team toEstonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Bulgaria "- the newspaper quotes the words of the commander of US ground forces in Europe, Lieutenant GeneralBen Hodges …»
2015, winter-spring « History of the Third World War. The skeleton is overgrown with muscles"
February 24: Narva, columns of American armored vehicles move towards the Russian-Estonian border; March 2: Mass reactivation and loading began in the USA military equipment; March 6: Units of the 3rd Infantry Division, the most combat-ready unit of the US ground forces that took Baghdad in 2003, arrive in Latvia; March 10: transfer of American armored vehicles toLatvia , plus another column of American armored vehicles on the Latvian road, but from a different batch (not sand-colored), plus the transfer of Abrams toLithuania ; March 12: transfer of American tanks and paratroopers to Tapa,Estonia ; March 15: Trains of NATO armored vehicles move east through the territoryRomania ; March 22: BRiga Michigan Guard soldiers and 155mm howitzers arrived; March 25: The US began military exercises inRomania and Bulgaria …
The Czechs are scared: US preparations for an attack on Russia are reaching the point of no return; March 26: Trains with US armored vehicles pass throughAustria towards Russia; March 28:Polish hotels received orders to prepare for the reception of military personnel and for conversion into hospitals and headquarters... The United States transferred a motorized infantry regiment toRomanian-Ukrainian border; April 20: American paratroopers and tank crews began training inEstonia ; April 21: NATO aviation,Sweden and Finland conducts exercises in the Baltic states; April 23:France throws toPoland armored unit; April 27:Finns preparing for war with Russia; May 6: US moves troops and equipment toGeorgia May 7: The US transferred toEstonia A-10 Thunderbolt attack aircraft; May 25: More than 100 NATO aircraft are practicing an attack on the Russian Federation from the territoryFinland, Sweden and Norway
October 2015 « Baltic puzzles form an ominous picture»
"In the hotels of the capitalEstonia every tenth person staying overnight is a military personnel from NATO countries.” “A single railway connection along the so-called “European gauge” (1435 mm) route Warsaw - Tallinn (Rail Baltica project) speeds up the delivery of military equipment and equipment from NATO allies to the Baltic states.”
Then it progressed progressively - amid laughter about “three Baltic tanks”, military equipment was constantly being pulled up to our borders, NATO commanders were studying the area of future military operations, Western propagandists were intensively dehumanizing the Russians.
April 2017 « America is preparing for a big war. And it will be long.»
May 2017 « Reconnaissance of strategic places» (Italian article about NATO deployment plans in case of war with Russia and the current deployment of US and NATO troops in Eastern Europe).
I missed a lot. News of US and NATO military preparations on our western borders has become so familiar that ordinary citizens, including myself, have practically stopped paying attention to them. Man is designed in such a way that even if he lives on a powder keg, he cannot constantly think about it.
Now about the present moment. Briefly
Recently, another American tank brigade was transferred to our borders. Finally, Russian officials began to express open concern about the accumulation of enemy troops. But this is no longer the most interesting thing. Everything is already clear with this - troops are being concentrated. And not at all to “calm down the Eastern European allies.” On the contrary, the “allies” were told to actively “worry” in order to explain the gathering of troops to our border.
There are even more interesting points. The question is why the Americans began to intimidate so actively North Korea . Why does she bother them so much? They put up with its existence for more than 60 years, and nothing. And the Koreans have had nuclear weapons for a long time, about 20 years already. Now what happened?
Answer - under the guise of preparing to “repel a nuclear attack by the DPRK,” force exercises are being conducted civil defense(FEMA), nuclear shelters are being put in order, etc. - the entire range of measures to prepare for a possible nuclear war is being rapidly carried out. Only not with the DPRK, but with Russia- the “Korean threat” is just a cover. We don’t know what role Kim Jong-un plays in this. Maybe he is acting on orders from the United States (hardly, but anything is possible), maybe he is simply being cleverly provoked into aggressive rhetoric.
In any case, the situation with the DPRK gives the Americans the opportunity to openly prepare for a nuclear war with Russia, and for an attack on us from the Pacific Ocean. A similar purpose is served by some suspicious swarm of hurricanes that struck in recent months to the USA. Whether they are caused artificially (which is quite real), or whether their power is artificially inflated by the media is not so important. It is important that, under the guise of fighting the elements, it is possible to conduct exercises for the mass evacuation of residents from large populated areas.
Another extremely alarming moment is the situation with Russian diplomatic missions, intentionally aggressive and offensive American behavior towards our diplomats. Why is all this? Why was it necessary to tear down our flags from diplomatic missions, for example? What pettiness is this?
I suspect that this is not at all a matter of innate Anglo-Saxon-Jewish rudeness.
We are being provoked to a very harsh response. As a result - a complete severance of diplomatic relations. Target? The evacuation of the embassy is one of the important signs of the last phase of preparations for war. Take it yourself and, for no apparent reason, take all your diplomats, agents, etc. out of Russia. - means giving the enemy an alarm signal. It is better for such an evacuation to occur as if by itself, step by step, as if even on our initiative. But it is important to see the meaning behind the rhetoric - American diplomats are being evacuated on the eve of war.
I'd like to be wrong. But Trump's recent statement at a meeting of senior US military leaders about the "calm before the storm" refers to an imminent war with Russia. That Trump was made president precisely to prepare for a big war, I suspected a year ago. True, I didn’t think that he was such a smart guy - he gave me several years to prepare. Although, perhaps, another six months or a year will pass before the decisive events.
Will start simultaneously on Ukraine- they will waste the cannon fodder of the Ukrainian Armed Forces to pin down part of our forces, attack Crimea, will hit Kaliningrad from Poland, will hit from Baltic states deep into Russia - there are directions to Smolensk, cutting off Belarus(they are trying to agree on neutrality with Lukashenko, it’s not a fact that they can, but they are trying), to Moscow and St. Petersburg. They will strike from the North from Scandinavia at the bases of the Northern Fleet. From Georgia. And from the Pacific direction.
They can light it in one place - Donbass, Baltic transit, Syria- doesn't matter. But then, to have a chance of victory, they need to attack from all directions at the same time. That's what they will do. In the end we will win, but a lot of people will die. Perhaps Putin will decide on a preemptive strike - then we will win faster and an order of magnitude fewer people will die on our side.
Nuclear weapon- a separate topic. Let me just remind you that chemical weapon It did nothing to prevent the Second World War. Well, about the fact that its reserves, in comparison with the 70s-80s of the last century, are not at all so large. Many military experts believe that nuclear war is quite possible, and there may be a winner. Whether it is true or not, I don’t know. The criterion of truth is practice. We'll live to find out. The question is - what about the losses of the American military? The answer is that it is not the loss figure itself that is important. What matters is what you get in return. For the victory over the great and terrible, but not bothering anyone, North Korea, it would be a pity to give up even one aircraft carrier. For victory over Russia and, as a consequence, absolute world domination, it would not be a pity to give up all the aircraft carriers and 90 percent of the fleet. Then you can build more, there will be no competitors in the military sphere, and there won’t be any at all, no one will dare to contradict.
The question is - have they gone crazy?
Long-term service to evil really seriously undermines mental abilities. Perhaps they simply have no choice and they think it’s better external war than the loss of global hegemony, a sharp decline in consumption and a violent surge in violence within the United States itself.
I would very much like the self-preservation instinct of the Western elite to somehow work and the operation to attack Russia to be cancelled. The only question is whether they have the physical ability to stop the already running mechanism of war.
The US Army can now accept recruits with various mental problems into its ranks, USA Today reports.
The ranks of the American military will also accept people who had problems with alcohol and drugs, and suffered from depression. Those who have ever engaged in self-harm without suicidal intent and who have suffered from bipolar affective disorder will be allowed to serve.
As the publication clarifies, the decision was made back in August, but it was not publicly announced. According to journalists, the new rules are due to the fact that by September 2018 the American army needs to recruit 80 thousand recruits. This order was given by the President of the United States Donald Trump which intends to expand the fight against terrorist groups. Previously, when it was necessary to recruit 69 thousand recruits, the United States allowed to draft into the army young people who had previously used marijuana and those who showed poor results on entrance tests.
If someone thought it was funny, I wouldn't have much fun.
Note to those who do not understand - the United States is not preparing for local wars, not for showdowns with the DPRK or Iran, but specifically to attack Russia. There was so much irony in the comments to the material “The United States is preparing to attack not the DPRK, but Russia” - https://dima-piterski.livejournal.com/567431.html
Well, let citizens explain with a sense of humor why the Pentagon needed to recruit tens of thousands of inadequate. For Afghanistan and other local conflicts? So that the hatred of the local population towards the Americans will intensify even more?
I'll tell you what kind of war such people are needed for - this cannon fodder for the Last Great War , when it will no longer give a damn about the “opinion of the world community” and even more so about the opinion of the local population, which is subject to destruction. For the War, after which, as they plan, no one in the world will ever dare to contradict them in anything.
The intensity of hatred towards Russia among Western propagandists is staggering. Such an emotional barrage cannot end in anything, just disappear. Throughout the Western direction, from Norway to Ukraine and Georgia, troops are gathering. Going to Eastern European and Ukrainian cannon fodder, which it would not be a shame to put in the first strategic echelon - to exchange hundreds of thousands of lives of “second-class people” to gain momentum, to tie down the forces of the Russian army at least for a short time in secondary directions in order to deliver a powerful blow to one or two decisive ones.
We have to stop this entire horde.
From the latest:
NATO is calling on European countries to upgrade their infrastructure for the rapid deployment of troops and military equipment, reports the Daily Mail. As the publication notes, delivering a speech to NATO defense ministers in Brussels, the Alliance Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg stressed that European roads, bridges and railway networks must be suitable for transporting tanks and heavy military equipment.
Report in German magazine Der Spiegel (issue 43/2017), based on a secret NATO document, indicates how far war plans have progressed. The magazine concludes: “In plain English: NATO is preparing for war with Russia.” NATO is establishing two new command centers in Europe.Transfer of American combat helicopters to Europe
Expert: The United States is preparing the population of Poland for a military strike on Kaliningrad
The United States is preparing the Polish population for a preemptive strike on Kaliningrad. This assumption was expressed to a REGNUM correspondent by a political scientist and expert on Poland. Marina Klebanovich, commenting on the publication in Poland of the book “Suwalki Corridor. Russia versus NATO,” where the author discusses the advisability of NATO seizing the Russian exclave.
“I am sure that the author of the book performs NATO order- voice the Alliance’s far-reaching plans for the preventive seizure of the Kaliningrad region. This book is the first sign,” says the political scientist. In her opinion, one of the most important elements of modern information warfare is the “right mood of the population” to justify certain actions.
“Today even the United States must explain to the population - at least its own and the European one - why they come here or there for military purposes, to convince them that they are doing the right thing, that they have no other choice, that they are actually defenders , Klebanovich continued. “And under the premise that Russia allegedly wants to seize the Suwalki corridor, plans are being made for a preventive attack on the Kaliningrad region.” The political scientist noted that today the Polish population has already succumbed to US information processing.
“Last week I read the latest sociological survey data on Poland and was amazed that 85% of the population do not rule out an attack Russian troops to Poland. These figures were published exactly on the eve of Polish Independence Day. These are more than alarming figures,” summed up Marina Klebanovich.
A REGNUM correspondent clarifies that the author of the book “Suwalki Corridor. Russia versus NATO" Tadeusz Kisielewski in an interview with the Polish portal WPolityce.pl, he said that he sees two options for the capture of the Kaliningrad region by NATO troops. According to Kiselevsky, the first option is “a preemptive operation designed to prevent a Russian attack on the Suwalki corridor.” The second is “the capture of the Kaliningrad region as a result of the Russian defeat in the Suwalki corridor.”
Let us remind you that the 60-kilometer section of the land border between Poland and Lithuania is the object of increased attention from NATO military analysts. This corridor is the shortest path to reunification Armed Forces Union State. In June 2017, more than 1.5 thousand NATO troops trained in Lithuania protection of the Suwalki corridor.
Putin: the economy and civil departments must be prepared to work in wartime conditions
November 22. President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin called for studying the shortcomings identified during the Zapad-2017 exercises and developing additional measures to increase mobilization readiness.
“As a result of the exercises, certain shortcomings were identified, we need to carefully study them, develop additional measures to increase mobilization readiness,” Putin said, opening a meeting with the leadership of the Russian Ministry of Defense, defense industry enterprises and a number of regions of the country. The President noted that during the meeting they plan to primarily touch upon the civilian aspects of the past exercises, since many civilian departments and regions were involved.
Summing up the results of the exercises, Putin called for an analysis capabilities of defense enterprises to quickly increase production volumes.
“I would like to note that the economy’s ability to quickly increase the volume of defense products and services in war time- one of the most important conditions ensuring the military security of the state, all strategic and simply large enterprises, regardless of their form of ownership, must be prepared for this,” Putin emphasized.
Putin about the Third World War. 2017
USA - RUSSIA war is inevitable
An attack by the US and NATO on Russia could begin in THREE directions. How can the Russian army respond?
More details and a variety of information about events taking place in Russia, Ukraine and other countries of our beautiful planet can be obtained at Internet Conferences, constantly held on the website “Keys of Knowledge”. All Conferences are open and completely free. We invite everyone who wakes up and is interested...
The world is on the threshold of the Third World War. Lately, such headlines can often be seen in the media. But is this really so? Vanga also spoke about the possible beginning of a global collision. Will there be a Third World War, when to expect it and which countries will face each other - read our material.
World War III: what is it?
The Third World War is a conflict that could hypothetically break out between different states.
Back in the 20th century, many predicted a war that could arise due to the use of nuclear warheads or other reasons. Thus, the most likely opponents were considered: India and Pakistan, North Korea and Iran, Russia and the United States.
Historians believe that the world war could have been provoked by the so-called Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. Then an extremely tense situation arose between the USSR and the USA, which was caused by the deployment of American nuclear weapons in Turkey, and then their secret transfer to Cuba. Then President John Kennedy, for the first time in the country's history, introduced DEFCON-2, that is, maximum military readiness.
During the period from 1970 to 1980, cases of anxiety arose. The most dangerous incident occurred in 1983, when Soviet systems detected the launch of a Minuteman missile in the United States towards the Soviet Union. But the alarm turned out to be wrong.
Has World War III already happened?
Exist scientific concepts that the world war has already ended. It is associated with the Cold War between the United States of America and the Soviet Union. It started in 1945, when the American Armed Forces dropped nuclear bomb to Hiroshima. It was a war that included a large number of local clashes. The main opponents were two superpowers - the USA and the USSR. They were supported by satellites, and countries from Europe, Asia, Africa and Latin America also took part.
States that had nuclear potential competed to see how quickly they could destroy the world.
This opinion is strongly supported by researcher Subcomandante Marcos. In addition, in Russia there are also adherents of a similar concept. Alexander Tarasov believes that the development of the Third World War does not necessarily follow the scenario of the First and Second.
Will there be a third world war: flashpoints of conflict
Experts from the Swedish Aftonbladet considered that the first stage of military action could be a clash at several points on the Earth.
The second region prone to collisions is the South China Sea. The conflict may unfold in the area of the islands that belong to different countries. And China and the United States will definitely take part in the war.
Third place in the list of the Swedish publication is occupied by the territory between India and Pakistan. These are two large states that have nuclear weapons. And terrorism can provoke a conflict.
An ambiguous situation exists between India and China. If the Indian authorities agree to recognize Tibet and support the military movement there, then it will be impossible to avoid conflict.
The Baltic states in this sense also remain a dangerous territory. Russia's ambitions are actively growing towards Europe, and this could serve as an impetus for war.
World War III: the fate of Ukraine
Interestingly, Ukraine is also included in the list of dangerous areas. American professor of defense and national security Robert Farley, giving a forecast, noted that our country is among the potential countries where a conflict could flare up. This is due, first of all, to the systematic violation of the truce in Donbass.
The conflict that will lead to World War III can arise in several scenarios. So, according to one of them, the Ukrainian government will be overthrown, which the Russian leadership will take advantage of. Total instability will begin in the country, and Vladimir Putin will see a chance for a full-scale takeover of Ukraine.
In another scenario, far-right radicals may come to power, and their actions will further intensify the conflict in Donbass. At the same time, Russia will take advantage of the situation and begin an invasion of the country, which will lead to a war with the participation of the Russian Federation, Europe and the United States.
World War III: the fate of Syria
Recently, the problem of the brewing conflict between the United States and Russia has become on the territory of Syria. Moreover, many experts consider the current situation more dangerous than the one that arose during the Cuban missile crisis.
On April 7, 2018, government forces of Russian ally Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons against rebels in the city of Douma. As a result, a hundred innocent people, including children, died.
Donald Trump has threatened to send American missiles to Syria. France may also likely join the operation. In addition, in response to such statements, representatives of the Russian Federation plan to shoot down all missiles that fly towards Syria. The US President wrote on his page in social network, that he no longer intends to tolerate an “animal” that destroys people with gas, and even gets pleasure from it.
World War III: Vanga's predictions
The prophecies of the fortuneteller are becoming more relevant every day. In the midst Cold War Vanga was very often asked questions regarding the Third World War.
It was not easy to understand the woman’s mysterious speeches. But one thing is clear - the Third World War may come very soon.
The last thing Vanga said on this issue was: “Syria has not fallen yet.” From the words of the Bulgarian seer, we can conclude that the confrontation will begin only after the end of the war in Syria.
Many agree that the international battle is already underway, and Vanga’s predictions have begun to come true. The woman believed that the Third World War would not look like the previous two, but would begin with a dim event in 2008, after which there would be an assassination attempt on several heads of state.
And so it happened, in 2008 a war began between the Russian Federation and Georgia. As for the assassination attempts, experts disagree: some believe that it was a disaster in which the President of Poland died, while others believe that the murder was prevented. In particular, the Estonian, Polish, Lithuanian and Ukrainian presidents were planning to fly to Georgia at the height of the conflict, but the flight was cancelled.
According to Vanga, the new war will not look like the last two, because other forms of influence will be used.
World War III: Predictions of Nostradamus
Many prophets predicted the Third World War as the bloodiest and cruelest. Some even compared it to the apocalypse, because after nuclear war existence on Earth will be impossible.
Thus, the legendary Nostradamus wrote a quatrain in which he predicted the beginning of the Third World War.
On the Danube from the Rhine he will get drunk
The Great Camel(s) will not repent of this.
The Rhone and the stronger ones from the Loire will tremble,
And near the Alps the Rooster will destroy him.
Experts believe that the war will begin when the Camel drinks water from the Danube and Rhine. In their opinion, the animal is associated with the Arab states that will invade Europe and reach the Danube and the Rhine.
In addition, the camel can represent the Arab population that today lives throughout Europe, especially in France and Germany.
This war will be so bloody that after it only India and China will remain, Nostradamus believed.
Researchers studying the works of Michel Nostradamus believe that the prophet predicted the appearance of Hitler in world history and even the terrorist attack in 2001 on the American Twin Towers. He also correctly outlined how ISIS would engage in barbarism in the Middle East, as well as its desire to take over Europe.
In addition, experts, having studied the works of the predictor, made a frightening conclusion that a new world war could occur just this year. A quatrain from the book “Predictions of Michel Nostradamus” of 1555 says that a serious confrontation will occur first in France, and then all European countries will be attacked. The war will be a very long and terrifying event. Nostradamus also believed that in 2018 two very strong states would collide, and this struggle would last exactly 28 years.
We have collected the most striking predictions regarding the Third World War.
Grigory Rasputin predicted that three snakes would pass through Europe, leaving behind only ashes and destruction. Many people call these three kites the three world wars.
The famous American psychic Sarah Hoffman predicted the worst disasters caused by a war using nuclear weapons. And the start of the collision will be a missile that took off from Libya and hit Israel. Moreover, in her opinion, Russian Federation and the PRC will try to attack the United States of America, but most likely will be defeated.
Tula psychic Christopher said many times that if war starts, it will be a terrible and bloody event. And Russia will become a central part of this confrontation. After it, a very small number of people will remain on the planet.
Nun Elena Aiello from Italy predicted that Russia would have some secret weapon with which it would conquer the whole world. At the same time, in another prophecy, the Italian stated that the Russian Federation would be burned to the ground.
Psychic from England Joanna Southcott has repeatedly repeated that a war in the East will mean the imminent end of peace for not the entire planet.
The famous healer Juna is encouraging with her predictions. According to her, there will be no Third World War at all.
