In the section on the question, please remind me how the saying about the beam in one’s own eye, given by the author, sounds verbatim Inna the best answer is A. S. Pushkin spoke like this:
"On my way home from the all-night vigil,
Antipyevna was scolding Marfushka;
Antipyevna was extremely excited.
“Wait,” he shouts, “I can handle you;
Do you think that I have already forgotten
That night when, crawling into a corner,
Have you been naughty with your godson Vanyushka?
Wait, hubby will find out about everything! »
- Should I threaten you? - Marfushka answers:
Vanyusha - what? After all, he is still a child;
And the matchmaker Trofim, who is with you
Both day and night? The whole city knows it.
Shut up, godfather: you, like me, are a sinner,
And you will offend everyone with words;
In someone else's - --- - you see a straw,
And you don’t even see a log in your place. "
Which of you didn't find the missing word? There are none, I can say with 100% confidence!
Finding out the author is much more difficult, isn't it? I inform you: Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin. And this poem
with such a pass was published in mass publications
collected works of the great poet during the times of strict Soviet censorship.
Did I miss something or what?
What kind of OS is there on Nokia 5800, because gladioli... idiocy..!
Answer from Flush[expert]
You notice a speck in someone else’s eye, but you don’t see a log in your own)
like so)
Answer from pickle[guru]
“He doesn’t see a log in his own eye, but he sees a speck / twig in someone else’s eye.”
Answer from Zloygenii[newbie]
I think that the word IZBE is missing because the poem is quite old, at the same time there was an expression not to wash dirty linen in public...
Answer from Extend[newbie]
pussy*
Answer from Yotiv Hammer[guru]
This is not a saying, but the words of Christ:
“How can you say to your brother: brother, let me take the speck out of your eye, when you yourself do not see the beam in your eye? You hypocrite! first take the plank out of your eye, and then you will see how to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.”
Judge and not be judged, for with the judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. And why do you look at the speck in your brother's eye, but do not feel the plank in your own eye? Or how do you say to your brother: “Let me take the speck out of your eye”; But is there a beam in your eye? Hypocrite! First take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see how to remove the speck from your brother’s eye. Do not give holy things to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet and turn and tear you to pieces.
This is how Matthew 7 begins. We are coming to the end of our conversation about the Sermon on the Mount. Chapter 7 sums it up. In the first five verses of the chapter, Jesus instructs the apostles on how they, in turn, can teach others to look within themselves. Remember, He began His teaching with a request to look into yourself? Now the apostles must teach this to others. Jesus instructs the apostles, I would say, with a sense of humor. To show the apostles more clearly how...
New Testament. The earliest division of the Bible, dating back to the times of the first Christian Church, was its division into two, far from equal parts, called the Old and New Testaments.
This division of the entire composition of biblical books was due to their relationship to the main subject of the Bible, i.e., to the personality of the Messiah: those books that were written before the coming of Christ and only prophetically prefigured Him were included in the Old Testament, and those that arose already after the coming of the Savior into the world and are dedicated to the history of His redemptive ministry and an exposition of the foundations established by Jesus Christ and His saints. the apostles of the Church, formed the “New Testament”.
All these terms, i.e., both the word covenant itself and its combination with the adjectives old and new covenant, are taken from the Bible itself, in which, in addition to their general meaning, they also have a special meaning in which we use them, saying about famous biblical books.
The word covenant (Hebrew - b…
Continuing to explain the previous words about the speck and the beam, Jesus Christ said: “Or how will you say to your brother: “Let me take the speck out of your eye,” but behold, there is a plank in your eye? Hypocrite! First take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye” (Matt. 7:4-5). How should these words be understood?
Using allegorical images, a knot and a log, these words say that a person does not have the right to judge his neighbor, pointing out his knots (shortcomings), since he himself is a sinner (has a log in his own eye). Having drawn the image of a man who finds shortcomings in other people and does not notice his own, the Savior asks that if a person himself is a sinner, where will his conscience be when he criticizes his neighbor for smaller shortcomings, when he himself is guilty of larger ones. That is, how the accuser will say that he will remove the speck from his brother’s eye when there is a plank in his own eye.
However, the type of person depicted in the words of the Savior is not...
It is noteworthy that over the years you begin to look at some things differently, I am surprised to discover new facets and depth of many seemingly simple and familiar truths. ...The point of view is changing, re-evaluation is underway.
Everyone probably knows Jesus' parable about the speck in someone else's eye and the beam in one's own. Previously, I understood it simply (what is not clear here...;); - you can see other people’s shortcomings well, you can’t see your own, almost... and that’s all. But for some time now I have discovered in this parable something that has always eluded me.
“...Or, as you can say to your brother: brother! Let me take the speck out of your eye, when you yourself cannot see the beam in your eye? Hypocrite! First take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye...” (Luke 6:42)
Notice - when you take the beam out of your eye, what will you see? Bitch? No! We can see the knot just fine with our log. Jesus says that when you take the beam out of your own eye, you will understand how much it hurts, and then you...
You raised an interesting topic!
How many hundreds of books have been written, how many studies of the New Testament and its textual criticism have been carried out!
However, I will try not to quote, but to answer your question in my own words.
First of all, we must remember that there is a Gospel in terms of TEXTOLOGY.
It is a record of the remembrance of Jesus' deeds and a record of His words.
We are reading the TRANSLATION.
The original languages of Jesus' preaching, according to textual scholars, were Hebrew and Aramaic. According to modern researchers, the parables familiar to us sounded almost like poems; they contained a play of linguistic meanings, poetry of linguistic meanings, which is impossible in translation.
Why a parable? A parable is a capacious, brief, if I may say so, ETERNAL form. In addition, it is understandable to everyone thanks to the ETERNAL simple but deep images embedded in it.
Image of grain. Image of a grapevine. The image of a grain of a mustard tree, the image of a wedding celebration... Do you understand how a field is sowed? Yes... Although it has passed...
They say that once upon a time there lived a man who had a log in his eye. The log was quite impressive in size, but this man did not want to notice the log in his eye.
The owner of the log really wanted to help the people around him become better people. He saw this as his mission.
As soon as he discovered a certain flaw, flaw or simply peculiarity in someone, he felt an incredible surge of strength, the meaning of his existence became even more obvious and necessary, a smile of goodwill and sympathy illuminated his face.
The man with a log in his eye immediately tried to help the poor fellow become better. He did it diligently and so selflessly that it was simply a sight for sore eyes!
However, unexpectedly for himself, he received in response not sincere gratitude, but something completely different. For some reason people were always actively indignant. They held tightly to their shortcomings, claimed that they had inherited these shortcomings and that they would not part with them yet...
Catchy - a speck from someone else's eye
And from afar it glitters and irritates, it’s an infection...
She looms like a ray of sun, in the refraction of a diamond,
But the beam in your own eye will not squeeze out a tear.
Everyone knows the parable about the beam in the eye - Christ.
But he only repeated the wisdom that was before,
In someone else's eye, a speck irritates like a wasp
But the beam in its own eye does not obscure the blue sky.
And if your neighbor is daring and smart, then you need to become smarter
And try to understand your neighbor with your heart and mind
But if you are not smarter than your neighbor, but stupider
You will remove the problem when you manage to calm your ambitions.
Always, everywhere, there is nothing to share or argue with a neighbor
May God grant us to eat our own and master our own
What is overgrown with dirt, clean it, start improving it
Then the speck in someone else’s eye will cease...
Among those who listened to Jesus Christ there were people who thought of themselves that they were righteous, were exalted and humiliated others. Jesus told them the following parable:
Two people came to the church to pray: one was a Pharisee, the other a publican.
The Pharisee, standing, prayed to himself like this: “God! I thank You that I am not like other people, robbers, offenders, libertines, or like this tax collector. I fast twice a week and give a tenth of everything I receive to the church.”
The publican, standing in the distance, did not even dare to raise his eyes to heaven; but, striking his chest, he said: “God, be merciful: be to me, a sinner!” “I tell you,” Jesus added, that it was the publican, and not the Pharisee, who went from the church forgiven to his home, for everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted.
Pride is disgusting to God; There is no vice that would be more harmful to us than pride. It prevents us from noticing our own weaknesses and shortcomings, and who doesn’t have them? Even the best person has them, and therefore we all owe...
Osho Rajneesh. Mustard seed. Conversations on the Parables of Jesus
Jesus said: You see the speck in your brother's eye, but you do not see the plank in your own eye...
Pages:
|all|
| 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 |
| 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 |
…When you take the plank out of your own eye, then you will see how to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.
What's wrong with my wife?
Self-knowledge is the most difficult thing - not because it is difficult, but because you are afraid to find out about yourself. There is a deep-seated fear. Everyone is trying to run, trying to push away from themselves. This fear is understandable. And if this fear exists, no matter what you do, it will not help much. You may think that you want to know yourself, but if this unconscious fear is present, you will constantly run away from self-knowledge, you will constantly try to hide, to evade. On the one hand, you will try to get to know yourself, and on the other hand, you...
“AND WHY DO YOU LOOK AT THE MOTCH IN YOUR BROTHER’S EYE”
Continuing to explain His idea that people should not judge in the sense of condemning, exposing their neighbors, Jesus Christ said: “And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not perceive the plank in your own eye” (Matthew 7:3 ). How should these words be understood?
When interpreting this verse, many explainers (exegetes) encountered difficulties in explaining and sometimes gave mutually exclusive interpretations. The first difficulty in interpreting this verse was related to the translation of the word “knot.” In the German translation of the Bible, Luther translated this word so that it became a polysemantic word and began to mean a splinter, a match, a splinter. In the English translation of the Bible, this word means an atom, a small particle or a match. In the Latin translation of the Bible, the Vulgate, as well as in the Russian Synodal translation, this word means a knot.
Perhaps inaccuracies in the translation of this word have caused conflicting interpretations of verse 3. For example, Saint...
BEAM IN THE EYE
"Hypocrite! First take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye” (Matthew 7:5).
In the last conversation I spoke about the words “If your eye is pure, your whole body will be bright.” But there is a log in this eye that prevents its purity. Christ says: “Take the beam out of your own eye, so that you can see clearly, just like taking the speck out of your brother’s eye” (*).
_____ (*) In the Bulgarian translation of the Gospel, the word “you will see” is accompanied by the word “purely”. In addition, instead of the Russian “bitch” in the Bulgarian translation, “straw”, about which the Teacher also makes several comments. _____
How to remove this log?
By the words “log” and “straw” Christ means two opposing principles, the principles of negation in human life. The person whose eye is focused on the physical world has a plank in his eye and is completely drowned in matter. The log is the law of contradictions. Under the word...
Events in Ukraine and Crimea occupy all the attention not only of our Russian official, so to speak, press, but also of all Russian leftists.
At the same time, the general position of the latter, all these “fighting for the rights of workers”, is full support for the actions of the Russian bourgeois government, which nicely chopped off a piece of territory from a neighboring state amid noisy cries about the oppression of Russian-speaking citizens in Ukraine and the “reunification of the Russian people.” The “particularly smart” ones on the left even presented what was happening in Crimea as a “re-creation of the USSR,” completely forgetting about the differences between a socialist and a bourgeois state. Some people shouted at the top of their lungs about “friendship of peoples.”
In general, everything was like in a good movie - all the roles were written, everyone was in their place, and it didn’t matter at all that the actors in this performance were not all professional, some, so to speak, gave themselves not for a salary, but “at the call souls."
Russian opportunism has reached its logical end, merging in voluptuous ecstasy with the Russian bourgeoisie.
The imperialist policy of the Russian government in Ukraine received the full support of the Russian population, overwhelmed by great-power patriotism. This is the reality of today's Russia, from which there is no escape. Almost no one spoke out against such a policy, with the possible exception of the liberal opposition, which managed to maintain its own view of what was happening, and literally a few representatives of the communist movement, who firmly stand in the positions of the proletariat and understand what is what.
But they were not listened to. And why? Now none of the leftists think about how their support for the Russian bourgeois government will turn out later. They will think later (and that’s not a fact!), when our people cry tears of blood. And you can be absolutely sure that this will happen.
What is the reason for these treacherous actions of the left? After all, among them there are a lot of those who sincerely consider themselves communists and even Marxist-Leninists?
Frightened by the threat of fascism, but not understanding its true essence, they were looking for someone who could hide under their wing from the impending danger. And they found such a “defender” in the person of the Russian bourgeois government. But the fact that this “defender” himself will give Bandera’s supporters and the Ukrainian right-wing opposition, which has now seized power in Ukraine, a hundred points ahead, in terms of oppressing the country’s own population, was somehow not taken into account by the Russian left and “communists.”
After all, it is indeed much calmer to look for specks in the eyes of your neighbor, stubbornly not noticing what has been going on under your nose for years (!!!), especially since the Russian authorities do not pat the “particularly sharp-eyed” on the head. Is this why a rare left-wing resource, even one that proudly declares its extreme revolutionary nature, will risk publishing any material related to the topic of terrorism and the events taking place in the North Caucasus?
But there is a real civil war going on there. And daily reports from this region - a rather large region, by the way, with a population of 15 million, like in Moscow - are reminiscent of reports from the front.
“In the North Caucasus, 11 people were killed during the armed conflict from March 24 to March 30.”
“Seven people became victims of the armed conflict in the North Caucasus from March 17 to 23.”
“5,291 people suffered from the conflict in the North Caucasus over four years, more than half in Dagestan.”
The count is already counting tens of thousands of dead, and even more injured. This is hundreds of times higher than the number of people killed in the “Maidan showdowns” in Ukraine.
But why doesn’t this bother ANYONE in Russia? Even “freedom-loving” liberals are silent, not to mention the left?
Maybe because it’s mostly not Russians who are killed there in the North Caucasus? But Russians are also dying there, both among local residents and among federal troops.
Or maybe our leftists and “communists” don’t pay attention to the North Caucasus because they don’t demolish monuments to Lenin, don’t paint swastikas everywhere, and don’t beat up members of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation? This means, in their opinion, there is nothing to worry about - there is nothing terrible in the events taking place in the Caucasus, no, this is not a “threat to fascism”, like in Ukraine.
But this, dear citizens, how can I say... If you know, the situation in the North Caucasus is an order of magnitude worse than what is happening now in Ukraine.
Here are excerpts from today's article from one sufficiently informed and serious resource:
“According to Aishat Dyshnoeva, on March 22 they woke up to the roar of many cars and screams. “We heard people shouting over the loudspeaker in Russian: “Get out, everyone get out of the house!” Turn on the lights in all rooms!” My mother and older brother Magomed and I spent the night in the old house, and Bashir and Aslan and his wife spent the night in the new one. We went out into the courtyard, and it was full of armed military men, almost all in black masks. There were armored personnel carriers and Ural vehicles near the house. They immediately put Magomed facing the wall, and Bashir on his knees and forced his hands behind his head. Mom rushed to him, but she, me and my pregnant daughter-in-law, Aslan’s wife, were forced to leave the yard. And then, about ten minutes later, we were put in a car and taken to Nazran. This is how I remember my brother – on his knees, hands behind his head. I never saw him alive again,” said Aishat.
According to her, in Nazran they were brought to the Center for Combating Terrorism of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for the Republic of Ingushetia, where they began to interrogate everyone: what the brothers were doing, who their friends were.
“Fingerprints and materials were taken from everyone for DNA testing. At the last interrogation I was asked to name all the brothers. I named everyone, including Bashir. And the one who interrogated asks again: “Is this the one who was killed?” I replied that when we left he was alive, and he grinned and said: “Well, yes, he is alive. Was alive." When we left the Ministry of Internal Affairs, I saw my older brother Magomed, he was all swollen from the beatings. His head was broken, his legs were swollen, and he could hardly walk. I asked what was wrong with Bashir, he replied that everything was fine. He didn’t say that he was killed, he didn’t want us to start crying there, in front of those who interrogated us,” said Aishat.
According to her, in the evening, when they returned home, they saw that nothing was left of the house. “But the saddest thing is that Bashir was killed. Magomed later said that the feds told the brothers to run away. Bashir asked: “Why should we run away if we are not guilty of anything and have done nothing?” Then they pushed Bashir hard, and in order not to lose his balance, he took several steps to the side. And then they fired a burst of machine gun fire at him. Then they brought his body into the house, laid him on the bed and blew up the house. And then they said that it exploded on its own because there were explosives and something else in the house. They took some kind of weapon, a bucket of something out of the house and said that it was all ours, and we kept it in our house. I saw all this for the first time,” Aishat continues her story.
Aishat also said that, according to eyewitnesses, before blowing up the house, all household appliances and the entire dowry of Bashir’s young wife were taken out of there - he only got married two months ago. “There was nothing left, everything was loaded onto the Ural and taken away. We have nothing to wear now. We walk around like homeless people. Sometimes we spend the night with some, sometimes with others. They took all our documents, mobile phones, and left nothing. The villagers help us. Last Saturday, guys from all over the village helped clear the rubble,” says Aishat.
According to her, their family members are still not left alone and are constantly being called in for interrogation. “But we have nothing to say, Bashir lived in front of everyone and everyone knows that he was not a member of any illegal armed groups. But no one wants to listen to us, no one cares about us and our misfortune,” says Aishat.”
Here's another piece of evidence:
“According to Leila Kurieva, the mother of the murdered Muslim Kuriev, several years ago she and her son bought a plot of land in the village of Plievo, on which they placed a trailer and purchased building materials to build a house on this site. “My son worked from dawn to dusk as a builder, and we had almost everything ready to start building our house. I thought that this year, closer to autumn, my son would get married. But everything turned out completely differently.”…
“On March 22, early in the morning, I heard the roar of engines, it was clear that this was not one car. I looked out the window and saw a Ural right next to our trailer and a lot of military men around. She woke up her son and said: “let’s go somewhere, let’s hide.” He just waved me off: “Where to run? Are we guilty of something in order to run somewhere, hide?” We stayed at home and didn't go out. About five o'clock they started shouting through the loudspeaker: “Owners of the trailer, get out!” I was terribly scared, my legs gave out, I couldn’t walk, my son helped me go out into the yard. The son raised his hands and said: “Guys, we have nothing, check!” Several people with machine guns entered the trailer past us, and after a few minutes they began shouting: “Kuriev, come here, let’s talk!” I didn’t want to let him go there alone, I rushed after him, and the military grabbed me and dragged me away from the trailer,” said Leila Kurieva.
According to the woman, she stood near the cars for a long time, until dawn, waiting for her son to be released. “I didn’t hear any shots in the house. Then I asked the employees who were standing nearby: “for what? Why are you here?" To which I heard: “Mother, do you think we want to stand here? It was your tip that gave you!” Kurieva said.
According to her, two employees in camouflage uniforms approached her and told her in Ingush that she needed to travel with them so that she could write an explanatory note. “I told them that I wouldn’t go anywhere until I found out what happened to my son. In response I heard a rude: “You’ll go wherever you go!” and they forced me into the car and took me away. When we passed our street, I saw that the Dyshnoevs were also full of military men, and many people had gathered. Their gate was open, I saw that the small house of the Dyshnoevs, which was located in the middle of the yard, opposite the gate, was destroyed,” the woman said.
In Nazran, she did not stay long at the Center for Combating Extremism, where Kurieva was brought. The employee, who, according to her, did not introduce himself, asked about her son, where he works, with whom he communicates, and whether he often leaves home. Leila replied that there was not a day when Muslim did not spend the night at home.
Leila Kurieva says that when she arrived home, they did not let her through the uncoupling for a long time, but then they let her through. “And when I was walking to the trailer, behind my back one of the military men told another that it was her murdered son lying in the trailer. That’s how I found out that I no longer have a son,” says Leila.
According to her, she was never allowed into the trailer, explaining that experts were working there.
“There were military men standing near the house, I asked them why they killed my son, and one of them said that they had a tip and some kind of list in which my son’s name was on it. In the yard I saw a stretcher and my son’s body on it. Then an ambulance arrived and took Muslim away,” says Leila.
Leila Kurieva arrived at her home only in the evening. Everything inside was turned upside down. Laptop, mobile phones, money, documents were missing.”
What was it? And so, just an ordinary anti-terrorist special operation, which every other day, and every day, is carried out here and there on the territory of the republics of the North Caucasus. The usual, so to speak, life of local peoples, driven to complete despair by what is happening.
“During the special operation on March 22, a house that belonged to village resident Khusein Pliev was also destroyed, said Leila Kurieva and the mother of the murdered Bashir Dyshnoev, Aishat Dyshnoeva. They also said that Khusein Pliev is visually impaired.
Askhab, a resident of the same locality who lives not far from Khusein Pliev, said that this man sees practically nothing. “We don’t know what he did wrong that his house was destroyed. Judging by the conversation between the security forces, we realized that they had made the wrong address in the dark. They also remembered that they also made the wrong address during the special operation in Dolakovo. The fact that there was a mistake in the work of the security forces is also evidenced by the fact that no accusations were made against Husein Pliev and his family from the specialists"..."
“According to Sarazdin Sultygov, one of the leaders of the public organization “Mekhk-Khel”, what happened in Plievo was an extrajudicial execution. “At the time the Olympics were going on, there were no special operations. Everything was calm. Now everything is back to normal: again special operations, again killing our guys. We know these young people who were killed on the night of March 22. Neither neighbors, nor relatives, nor fellow villagers who had to communicate with them can say anything bad about them. They lived quietly and worked. One of them got married two months ago, the other was planning to start a family. But they were killed. A thread broke, a branch of the family tree was broken. And who will be responsible for this? Practice shows that the guilty will not be found, and those killed will be declared members of illegal armed groups. But it does not happen that a person leads a double life. After all, this is a village, everyone here is in sight of each other,” he declares.
Sultygov believes that even if these guys were engaged in some kind of illegal activity, had connections with members of illegal armed groups, then this must, firstly, be proven, and secondly, judged, as required by the law.”
We completely agree with the opinion of the head of the public organization Sultygov - it is impossible to kill people without trial, even if the bourgeois government passes five hundred laws allowing this. If a person is guilty, prove it, convict him and punish him. Only this way and no other way. Otherwise, there can be no talk of any democracy in the country.
We fully understand that the testimony of private individuals, especially relatives of the victims, is a subjective opinion, which may well not reflect the real picture of what happened in the village then. But the point is that this is by no means an isolated incident. There is a lot of similar evidence on the same Internet resource, as well as many examples when relatives of people who died just as innocently managed to prove their case in international courts.
But the point is not even that, but first of all the fact that the problem and a serious problem EXIST . And it should not be hushed up, but SOLVED. There has been a civil war in the North Caucasus for several years now, in which real people are dying. And they die DAILY! Not seeing, not noticing the ongoing tragedies of entire nations under one’s nose, while simultaneously shouting about protecting the rights of Russian-speaking citizens in other countries, is shameful hypocrisy and servility towards one’s own bourgeoisie, which covets foreign territories, not wanting to solve the problems of its own country and those inhabiting it peoples!
An equally real fact in our country is the CTO regime, which actually abolishes all civil rights and freedoms of the Russian population. Any influential person can, if desired, bring anything under this regime. And as we see, they fail by forming as they please the very “lists” in accordance with which special operations are carried out. And this is nothing more than state terrorism, since these interested and influential persons act on behalf of the entire Russian state. This is the same terrorist dictatorship of big capital, i.e. fascism, which they talk about so much about Ukraine, and completely ignore its manifestations in their own country - in Russia.
Moreover, this policy of the Russian government also tends to become tougher. The events of recent years clearly and clearly show that the scope of application of this CTO is expanding more and more, involving new areas of the country. The civil war is spreading throughout the south of Russia. And there is no guarantee that she will not go further. The Russian government is becoming more and more impudent every day, and is increasingly curtailing the rights and freedoms of Russian citizens. Any protest, any indignation of workers is now equated by her almost to a crime, for which one can easily get a prison sentence or a bullet in the forehead.
Isn’t all this a terrorist dictatorship of the ruling class of the Russian oligarchy, oppressing the entire working people, who are now deprived of any rights to express their will in any way? Isn’t this the same fascism that our Russian leftists are scared to death of? It’s just too late to be afraid, he’s already here in Russia. Including the fault of the leftists themselves, who did not bother to recognize this impending danger in time.
Now there is only one thing left - to fight against it with all our might, forming that very broad Popular Front of the struggle for the democratization of the entire Russian society, which should include all the progressive forces of the country. And this needs to be done not only in Ukraine, as we did in our time, but also here in Russia. The struggle for democracy, for the expansion of civil and political freedoms in the country, the broad class struggle of the Russian proletariat for its liberation is the only way to lay siege to the unleashed big capital in Russia, which, if not stopped in time, will inevitably drag our country into a new world imperialist massacre.
Oh, how this speck haunts us, especially if it is in the eye of the man we love. This is a familiar situation, isn't it? We picture in our imagination an ideal, beautiful and sexy partner and then begin to take apart, piece by piece, the specimen that we came across in real life. And there’s no escape from these specks, they really hurt your eyes! God, how terribly he eats, and he chomps, and he snores like at night!!! Have you seen how he squeezes out the paste? No, well, all people squeeze out starting from the bottom, but he squeezes in the middle of the tube!
And in general, you’ve already forgotten the last time he gave flowers, and what are these get-togethers every weekend with friends in a cafe? Why do you think this happens? Have you ever thought that perhaps the man you love would rather sit in a cafe with friends than spend time with you and this is only your fault! Does he snore at night? But you nag him endlessly for no reason or reason! Is he squeezing out the paste the wrong way? But you scatter used cotton pads for makeup removal everywhere!
Do you think it’s normal to conduct interrogations every day “with passion” about where you were, what time, with whom, why didn’t you call during the last two hours? Lord, why didn’t you call yourself? What kind of crazy stereotypes are these that a man should always make the first step! Or maybe he was also waiting for you to call first? Are you annoyed by his inattention in bed? Well, it’s also unpleasant for him, to put it mildly, to listen to your “heartbreaking” story about how your best friend broke up with her boyfriend again. You lack passion and romance, tell me, do you meet your loved one in the evening with a romantic dinner by candlelight? Do you buy sexy lingerie and take good care of your body? Do you do anything yourself to ensure that the passion does not fade away?
You constantly make mountains out of molehills, work yourself up, throw tantrums and periodically send your beloved on an “erotic journey on foot,” and then you wonder why he has lost interest in you? Yes, because there is a strange woman next to him, he linked his fate with a completely different person and was not ready for the “metamorphoses” that began to happen to you. Are you offended that he doesn’t support you, doesn’t want to understand your problems and find out what’s going on in your soul? Tell me, when was the last time you helped him? When did you have a heart-to-heart talk? And there is no need to justify yourself by saying that everything needs to be pulled out of it with claws! Of course, if you endlessly nag a man, who will want to share their problems after that? And you try not to scold, but to support, help to believe in yourself.
Remember what you were like, when you met, did you try to pry into his past and make scenes of jealousy about it? Yes, you and your friends didn’t annoy him, on the contrary, they seemed nice and sociable, and you yourself didn’t mind being in their company. You didn’t care at all about his habit of parading around the apartment in shorts and snoring at night. You watched not only your appearance, but also what and how you said. Previously, there were no rude words in your vocabulary that you could address to him. Why has everything changed now? Instead of being attentive and sensitive, you became selfish and rude, a man became for you a thing that should be as convenient as possible for you, otherwise it is useless.
If you want to fix everything and return to that wonderful time when you were happy, understand one simple thing: you caused this attitude towards yourself. Everything returns to normal, and no matter how much negativity we sow, sooner or later we get in return. If you want to receive something, you must first give something. Living in a couple, it is impossible to just take and demand; you also need to do something for your loved one. Be objective, because before you gave a lot, so you received just as much. Do you want romance, passion, beautiful relationships? Begin with yourself. Prepare a nice gift and a romantic dinner for your man. Don’t be afraid to take the first step, the cause of all failures is in matters of the heart, only in ourselves, so your happiness is in your hands!
