How to parse a proposal by members?
The members of a sentence are the structural components of a sentence as a semantically complete unit of speech. The members of a sentence differ from each other in the functions they perform in the sentence. Each member of a sentence can be expressed either as a separate word or as a phrase.
What are the members of a sentence?
To perform syntactic parsing according to the members of a sentence, we need to remember what the members of a sentence are in principle. All members of a sentence are divided into main and secondary.
The main members include the subject and the predicate. The subject names the person referred to in the statement and denotes the bearer of the action. The predicate conveys information about the action or state of the subject. Subjects and predicates form the grammatical basis of a sentence. If a sentence has one stem, it is simple; if it has two, it is complex.
The secondary members include the addition (names the objects to which the action is directed), definition (names the characteristics of the objects) and circumstances (report the time, place, method of action).
Analysis of proposals by members
Let's take a lighter version - a simple sentence. Its analysis begins by finding the main members of the sentence. The subject will answer the question who? or what? and expressed by a noun in the nominative case or a pronoun, can be an infinitive. The predicate answers the question what to do? and is expressed by a verb. Having found the main terms, we underline the subject with one solid line, and the predicate with two. Note that there are sentences that contain only a subject or only a predicate.
The next step in parsing a sentence is to find its secondary members. Minor members will depend on other members of the sentence and complement the information conveyed by them.
The object in a sentence is expressed by a noun or pronoun, answers questions of indirect cases and is underlined by a broken line.
The definition answers the questions: what? what?, is expressed by an adjective, participle, pronoun and is highlighted by underlining with a wavy line.
The circumstance answers the questions where? How? Why? Where? why?, underlined by a broken line with dots. Expressed by an adverb, gerund, noun, infinitive.
A special case is the analysis of a sentence with homogeneous members. Homogeneous members of a sentence perform the same function in it and answer the same questions. All members of a sentence can be homogeneous: both main and secondary. This means that a sentence can have two or more subjects, two or more predicates, etc. Homogeneous members usually follow each other, are separated from each other by commas, or are connected by a conjunction.
If the sentence is complex, that is, it has two grammatical bases, not only the main sentence, but also the subordinate one is parsed in a similar way.
Let's look at a simple example. In the sentence “Everyone is preparing sleighs in the summer,” the word “everyone” (who?) is the subject, “they are preparing” (what are they doing?) is the predicate, “sleigh” (are they preparing what?) is the object, “in the summer” (they are preparing when?) - circumstance.
The order of parsing a simple sentence
1. Parse the sentence into members and indicate how they are expressed (first, the subject and predicate are analyzed, then the minor members related to them).
2. Determine the type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement (narrative, incentive, interrogative).
3. Determine the type of sentence by emotional coloring (exclamatory, non-exclamatory).
4. Find the grammatical basis of the sentence and prove that it is simple.
5. Determine the type of sentence by structure:
a) two-part or one-part (definitely personal, indefinitely personal, generalized personal, impersonal, nominal);
b) widespread or not widespread;
c) complete or incomplete (indicate which part of the sentence is missing);
d) complicated (indicate how it is complicated: homogeneous members, isolated members, appeal, introductory words).
6. Draw up a sentence diagram and explain punctuation marks.
Parsing samples
1) My bonfire shining in the fog(A.K. Tolstoy).
The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, widespread, complete, uncomplicated.
Grammar basis - the fire is shining my expressed by a possessive pronoun. The predicate refers to the adverb of place in the fog expressed by a noun in the prepositional case with a preposition V.
Sentence outline At the end of a given declarative sentence there is a period.
2) At the end of January, surrounded by the first thaw, cherry trees smell good gardens (Sholokhov).
The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, widespread, complete, complicated by a separate agreed definition, expressed by a participial phrase.
Grammar basis - the gardens smell. The subject is expressed by a noun in the nominative case, the predicate is a simple verb, expressed by a verb in the indicative mood. The subject includes an agreed definition cherry expressed as an adjective. The predicate refers to the circumstance of time in the end of January, expressed by the phrase (noun + noun) in the prepositional case with a preposition V, and the circumstance of the course of action Fine expressed by an adverb.
Sentence outline At the end of a given declarative sentence there is a period; commas in the sentence highlight the participial phrase, which, although it stands before the word being defined, is isolated because it is separated from it in the sentence by other words.
Ways to emphasize sentence members
When parsing a sentence into members, standard underlines are used: one line for the subject, two lines for the predicate, a dotted line for the object, a wavy line for the definition, alternating dots and dashes for the circumstance.
In some schools, the main member of a one-part sentence is emphasized with three features, but more common is the underlining, in which the main member of a noun sentence is marked as the subject, and the main members of other one-part sentences are marked as predicates.
When emphasizing the minor members of a sentence, it is advisable to be guided by the following principles.
An isolated member of a sentence is emphasized as a single member.
Accordingly, non-isolated members should be emphasized as detailed as possible in accordance with the questions asked to them.
Designation of words and phrases that are not parts of the sentence
As is known from morphology, auxiliary parts of speech are not parts of a sentence, but during syntactic parsing certain problems can be associated with them.
Conjunctions are not members of a sentence and are not distinguished when homogeneous members are combined, but in some cases they can be part of non-uniform members of a sentence.
Firstly, these are comparative conjunctions as part of comparative phrases, for example: The surface of the bay was like a mirror.
Secondly, these are unions consisting of isolated members of a sentence, for example: Stopping often and for a long time, we got to the place only on the third day.
Prepositions also cannot act as independent members of a sentence, but they are used as part of a prepositional-case group, together with the case form, expressing a certain meaning.
Therefore, it is customary to emphasize the preposition together with the noun to which it refers. In this case, it is necessary to pay attention to cases when the preposition and noun are separated by adjectives or participles, for example: instead of older brother. In this case, it would be a mistake to emphasize the preposition together with the adjective as a modifier; the underscore should be as follows: instead of older brother.
Formative particles are part of compound verb forms and are emphasized together with the verb both in contact and non-contact positions, for example: Let him call me!
Semantic (non-shape-forming) particles are not members of a sentence, however, in school practice, a negative particle is not usually emphasized as a single member of a sentence together with the word to which it refers, for example: No smoking here. I didn't really count on help.
It is acceptable not to highlight both prepositions and all semantic particles.
Some teachers teach to highlight conjunctions by circling them, and prepositions by circling them with a triangle. This allocation is not generally accepted.
Introductory words and addresses are not parts of the sentence. Sometimes students enclose these components in square brackets or underline them with crosses. This is undesirable, since underlining is used only to indicate members of a sentence; It is permissible to mark these elements of the sentence by writing the words “introductory” or “address” over them.
Description of the complicating members of the sentence
When a sentence is complicated by direct speech or an inserted sentence, they are considered and described as an independent sentence, since both direct speech and an inserted sentence have their own purpose of utterance and intonation, which may not coincide with the purpose of the utterance and the intonation of the sentence itself.
So, for example, the proposal He asked indignantly: “How long will you continue to dig?!” should be analyzed as follows: the sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, common, complete, complicated by direct speech. Direct speech is an interrogative, exclamatory, two-part, extended, complete, uncomplicated sentence.
The participial phrase complicates the sentence only if it is isolated. At the same time, the description should indicate the complication not by a participial phrase, but by a separate definition; in brackets it is possible, but not necessarily, to indicate that it is expressed by a participial phrase.
The comparative phrase can be any member of the sentence - the predicate ( This park is like a forest), circumstance ( The rain was pouring down like buckets), addition ( Petya draws better than Anton), definition (He's almost the same as his brother). In this case, comparative turnover can be either separate or non-separated. Complication is caused only by a separate comparative phrase, and, as in the case of a participial phrase, it is necessary to indicate the complication with a separate circumstance, addition or definition.
Homogeneous members, introductory words and sentences, and addresses are also described as complicating the structure of a sentence.
Sentences with homogeneous predicates present some complexity. In school and pre-university practice, it is believed that a two-part sentence in which the subject is used with several predicates is a simple sentence complicated by homogeneous predicates. In a one-component sentence, there are as many parts as there are predicates in it, with the exception of cases when the structure of the predicate contains homogeneous parts.
For example: I was offended and did not want to answer him- a simple two-part sentence with homogeneous predicates.
I felt offended and didn’t want to answer him.- difficult sentence.
I felt sad and lonely- a simple one-part (impersonal) sentence with homogeneous parts of the predicate.
One-part sentences
When analyzing one-part sentences, students often make various mistakes.
The first type of errors is associated with the need to distinguish between one-part and two-part incomplete sentences.
As already mentioned, we diagnose a definite-personal sentence by the form of the main member: the predicate in it is expressed by a verb in the form of the 1st and 2nd person singular and plural indicative mood (in the present and future tense), and in the imperative mood; the producer of the action is defined and can be called personal pronouns of the 1st and 2nd persons me, you, we, you:
I walk and walk, but I can’t reach the forest.
The peculiarity of verb forms with the morphological feature of the 1st and 2nd person is that each of these forms can “serve” one single subject: a form ending in -у ( go-y) - pronoun I, form with ending -eat/-ish ( go-eat) - pronoun you, form with -em/-im ( let's go) - pronoun we, form with -ete/-ite ( let's go) - pronoun you. Forms 1 and 2 of the imperative mood also clearly indicate the person who is the producer of the action.
Since the morphological feature of a person is represented by a verb only in the indicated forms, sentences of a similar meaning with a predicate-verb in the form of the past tense of the indicative mood and the conditional mood are considered two-part incomplete, for example:
He walked and walked, but never reached the forest.
In this sentence, the form of the predicate does not indicate in any way the producer of the action.
Even if it is clear from the previous context that the producer of the action is the speaker(s) or the hearer(s), sentences or parts of a complex sentence without a subject with a predicate in the past tense or in the conditional mood should be characterized as two-part incomplete, since information about the producer of the action is extracted not from the sentence itself, but from the previous context, which, in fact, is an indicator of the incompleteness of the sentence or part of it; see, for example, the second part of a complex sentence:
I would help you if I knew how.
In indefinite-personal sentences, as already mentioned, the main member is expressed by a verb in the 3rd person plural form (present and future tense in the indicative mood and in the imperative mood), the plural form of the past tense of the indicative mood or a similar form of the conditional mood of the verb. The producer of the action in these sentences is unknown or unimportant:
They are calling you / they called / let them call / they would call you.
Such sentences without a subject with a predicate in the indicated forms, in which the producer of the action is known from the previous context, are not indefinitely personal; see for example the second sentence in the following context:
We left the forest and tried to get our bearings. Then we walked along the path to the right.
Such sentences are also two-part incomplete.
Thus, when characterizing a sentence as a single-component definite-personal, it is necessary to remember the restrictions on the form of the predicate; when diagnosing a sentence as indefinite-personal, it is also necessary to take into account the meaning - an indication that the performer of the action is unknown.
Generalized personal one-part sentences include not all one-part sentences that report an action that can be attributed to everyone, but only those in which the predicate is expressed in the 2nd person singular form of the indicative and imperative moods or the 3rd person plural indicative form moods:
The forest is being cut down and the chips are flying.
However, in a generalized personal meaning, definitely personal sentences with the main member in the form of 1st person and impersonal sentences can be used: What we have, we don’t keep; when we lose it, we cry; If you're afraid of wolves, don't go into the forest. Nevertheless, such proposals are not usually characterized as generalized and personal.
The greatest difficulties are associated with parsing an impersonal sentence.
It is very difficult to determine the composition of the main members in sentences like We had a lot of fun going down this slide., i.e. in sentences containing a copula, a nominal part and an infinitive. There are two traditions in the analysis of such proposals.
There is an opinion that when characterizing such sentences as impersonal or two-part, it is not the sequence of components that is important (the infinitive at the beginning of the sentence or after the copula and the nominal part), but the meaning of the nominal part of the predicate.
So, if in the nominal part an adverb is used with the meaning of the state experienced by the performer of the action (fun, sad, hot, cold, etc.), then this is a one-part impersonal sentence:
It was fun going down this slide.
It was fun to ride down this slide.
If in the nominal part a word is used with the meaning of a positive or negative evaluation (good, bad, harmful, useful, etc.), then we have a two-part sentence with a subject, an expressed infinitive:
Smoking was bad for him.
Smoking was bad for him.
According to another linguistic tradition, the characteristics of a sentence of this type depend on the order of the words in it, and not on the meaning of the word in the nominal part. If the infinitive comes before the connective and the nominal part, then, given the relatively free order of words in the Russian language, it denotes the subject of the message and is the subject:
Smoking was bad for him.
If the infinitive follows the copula and the nominal part, then we have an impersonal sentence:
Smoking was bad for him.
With regard to impersonal sentences, it is also necessary to note the following: not impersonal, but two-part incomplete, it is customary to consider parts of a complex sentence in which the subject position is replaced by an explanatory clause or direct speech, for example:
You could hear the gate creaking a (compare: It was audible).
“I’m lost,” flashed through my head.(compare: It flashed through my head).
Such sentences without a subordinate clause or direct speech lose all meaning and are not used, which is a criterion for the incompleteness of a sentence. Thus, the sentences *It was heard or *It flashed through my head cannot be understood and are not used.
Syntactic parsing of a sentence is the parsing of a sentence into members and parts of speech. You can parse a complex sentence according to the proposed plan. The sample will help you correctly format a written analysis of a sentence, and the example will reveal the secrets of oral syntactic analysis.
Sentence parsing plan
1. Simple, simple, complicated by homogeneous members, or complex
2. According to the purpose of the statement: narrative, interrogative or motivating.
3. By intonation: exclamatory or non-exclamatory.
4. Common or not common.
5. Determine the SUBJECT. Ask questions WHO? or WHAT? Underline the subject and determine which part of speech it is expressed in.
6. Define the PREDIC. Ask questions WHAT DOES? etc. Underline the predicate and determine which part of speech it is expressed in.
7. From the subject, ask questions to the secondary members of the sentence. Underline them and determine which parts of speech they are expressed in. Write down phrases with questions.
8. From the predicate, ask questions to the secondary members. Underline them and determine which parts of speech they are expressed in. Write down phrases with questions.
Sample sentence parsing
The sky was already breathing autumn, and the sun was shining less and less often.
This sentence is complicated First part:
(what?) sky - subject, expressed by a singular noun. h., Wed. R., Nar., Inanimate., 2 sk., i. P.
(what did?) breathed - predicate, expressed by the verb nes. view, 2 pages, unit. h., past vr., wed. R.
breathed (what?) in the fall - addition, expressed by a noun in singular. h., w. r., narit., inanimate., 3rd class., etc.
breathed (when?) already - a circumstance of time, expressed by an adverb
The second part:
(what?) sunshine - subject, expressed as a singular noun. h., Wed. R., Nar., Inanimate., 2 sk., i. P.
(what did it do?) shone - predicate, expressed by the verb nes. view, 1 book, unit. h., past vr., wed. R.
shone (how?) less often - a circumstance of the manner of action, expressed by an adverb
shone (when?) already - a circumstance of time, expressed by the adverb
Example of parsing a sentence
They either flew obliquely in the wind, or lay vertically on the damp grass.
This proposal is simple.
(what?) they are the subject, expressed by a plural pronoun. h., 3 l., i. P.
(what did they do?) flew - homogeneous predicate, expressed by the verb non.view, 1 sp., plural. h.. last vr..flying
(what did they do?) lay down - homogeneous predicate, expressed by the verb non.view, 1 sp., plural. h.. last vr..
flew (how?) obliquely - a circumstance of the course of action, expressed by an adverb.
flew (how?) in the wind - circumstance of the course of action, expressed by the adverb
lay down (how?) vertically - a circumstance of a course of action, expressed by an adverb
lay down (where?) on the grass - an adverbial circumstance of place, expressed by a common noun, inanimate, in singular. h., w. r., 1 fold, in v.p. with a pretext
grass (what kind?) raw - definition, expressed by an adjective in singular. h., w.r., v.p.
Let's read the words: stars, first, on, sky, lit up.
Let's define parts of speech.
Stars(what?) - noun, first(which ones?) - adj. name, on- pretext, sky(what?) - noun, lit up(what did they do?) - verb.
How do words become parts of a sentence? What types of sentence members are they?
If you make a sentence out of words, then independent parts of speech, together with auxiliary ones, will sometimes be members of the sentence.
The stars lit up.
Each word in a sentence has its own role.
What does the sentence say? What? - asterisks- this is the subject, we underline it with one line. What does it say about the subject? Stars what did you do? - lit up- this is a predicate, we emphasize it with two features.
The grammatical basis of a sentence is the main members of the sentence, the members of the sentence, without which it cannot exist.
You can use other words that will help more fully and accurately describe objects and phenomena of the surrounding reality.
The first stars lit up in the sky.
This sentence has secondary members of the sentence - members of the sentence without which it can exist.
All members of the sentence, except the subject and predicate, are called minor. They explain, clarify, supplement, and expand both the main and minor members.
Which word explains the subject? Asterisks (which ones?) are first.
Which word specifies the predicate? Light up (where?) in the sky.
The sentence has 2 main and 2 minor parts of the sentence.
And there are 5 parts of speech.
Functional parts of speech (prepositions and conjunctions) are not counted separately as members of a sentence.
Let's write out the grammatical basis from sentences 1 and 2 and show graphically whether the secondary members belong to the subject or the predicate.
One day I met an amazing toad. She had a white fluffy feather on her head. A real toad king!(N. Sladkov)
I met- the basis of the proposal. I- subject, met- predicate.
Met(When?) one day Met(whom?) toad, the minor member refers to the predicate.
Toad(which one?) amazing, a minor term refers to another minor term.
There was a feather- the basis of the proposal. Feather- subject, was- predicate.
Feather(which?) white, fluffy, minor members relate to the subject. Was(where? on what?) on the head, the minor member refers to the predicate.
Was(who?) she has, the minor member refers to the predicate.
Are you interested in knowing where this incomprehensible and even fabulous decoration comes from? There was a chicken coop nearby. The toad crawled out of it. There a fluffy chicken feather stuck to her head.
Are two words enough to understand the meaning of a sentence?
Lightning flashed. Thunder rolled. It began to rain.
We understand the meaning of these proposals. They say about lightning, about thunder, about rain. These are subjects expressed by nouns. Flashed, rolled, gushed- these are predicates, expressed by verbs. These are not common offers.
A sentence that consists only of main members is called unextended.
You can convey information more accurately, in detail, and expressively. Sentences in which, in addition to the main members, there are secondary ones, are called widespread.
Extend the proposals using the diagrams.
Bright lightning flashed over the forest.
Lightning(which?) bright
Flashed(where? over what?) over the forest, the minor member refers to the predicate, expressed by a noun with a preposition.
Distant thunder rolled.
Thunder(Which?) remote, the minor member refers to the subject, expressed by an adjective.
Heavy rain poured down above us.
Rain(Which?) pouring, the minor member refers to the subject, expressed by an adjective.
gushed(over whom? where?) above us, the minor member refers to the predicate, expressed by a pronoun with a preposition. (see Fig. 2)
Rice. 2. Common offers
Determine which offers are not common.
The grass has withered. Summer is over. Autumn has covered the forest paths.(M. Isakovsky)
The grass has withered. Summer is over.
Sentences 1 and 2 are not widespread, since they contain only main members.
What?- herbs, what did you do? - wilted. This is the subject and the predicate.
What?- summer, what did? - passed. This is the subject and the predicate.
Autumn has covered the forest paths.
Sentence 3 is common because it contains minor members.
What?- autumn, what did you do? - swept up. These are the main members.
Swept up(What?) trails, trails(which?) forest These are the minor members.
Read what sentences are written here?
According to the diagram, we see that in sentence 1 there are two minor members: on swan wings.
In sentence 2 there is one minor member: In the woods.
Sentence 3 has one minor member: in the streams.
Sentence 4 has two minor members: fresh, in the branches.
Here are some proposals you can make using the schemes.
Spring has arrived on swan wings. The snow is falling in the forest. The ice floes in the streams are ringing. A fresh wind whistles through the branches.(According to V. Bianchi)
What parts of speech are the members of the first sentence expressed?
Spring has arrived on swan wings.
Arrived- verb, Spring- noun name, on- pretext, swan- adj. name, wings- noun
Outline your proposal. Start your work with the main members.
The wind carried a small seed under the birch tree.
What can we tell you about the proposal?
Offer
by purpose: narrative, interrogative, motivating;
by intonation: exclamatory, non-exclamatory;
by the presence of minor members: widespread, not widespread;
by composition: simple, complex.
This is a sentence for the purpose of the statement narrative, by intonation non-exclamatory.
The sentence talks about (what?) the wind. Wind- This is the subject, expressed by a noun.
Wind(What did you do?) brought it in.brought it in- this is a predicate, expressed by a verb.
Since, besides the main ones, there are other members, the sentence common.
brought it in(Where?) under the birch, the minor member explains the predicate, expressed by a noun with a preposition.
brought it in(What?) seed, the minor member explains the predicate, expressed by a noun.
seed(which?) small, a minor member explains another minor member, expressed by an adjective.
The sentence has one stem, so it simple.(see Fig.3)
Rice. 3. Analysis of the proposal
Don't mix these concepts.
Parts of speech: noun, adjective, pronoun, verb, adverb, preposition, conjunction.
Members of the sentence: (subject and predicate) main members, secondary members.
Parts of speech are groups of words that differ in what question the words answer, what they mean, and how they can change.
Members of a sentence are independent parts of speech (sometimes with auxiliary parts) as part of a sentence.
- M.S. Soloveychik, N.S. Kuzmenko “To the secrets of our language” Russian language: Textbook. 3rd grade: in 2 parts. Smolensk: Association XXI century, 2010.
- M.S. Soloveychik, N.S. Kuzmenko “To the secrets of our language” Russian language: Workbook. 3rd grade: in 3 parts. Smolensk: Association XXI century, 2010.
- T. V. Koreshkova Test tasks in the Russian language. 3rd grade: in 2 parts. - Smolensk: Association XXI century, 2011.
- T.V. Koreshkova Practice! Notebook for independent work in the Russian language for 3rd grade: in 2 parts. - Smolensk: Association XXI century, 2011.
- L.V. Mashevskaya, L.V. Danbitskaya Creative tasks in the Russian language. - St. Petersburg: KARO, 2003
- G.T. Dyachkova Olympiad tasks in Russian. 3-4 grades. - Volgograd: Teacher, 2008
- School-collection.edu.ru ().
- School-collection.edu.ru ().
- Oldskola1.narod.ru ().
- Oldskola1.narod.ru ().
- Read the text. Identify parts of speech. What part of speech is not in the text? Circle the number of the correct answer.
1) Im. noun
2) Im. adj.
4) Im. number
To collect a kilogram of honey, a worker bee makes up to one hundred and fifty flights. During one honey harvest, a swarm of bees flies a distance equal to the distance from the Earth to the Moon.
From the magazine "Young Naturalist".
- Decide into which three groups these words can be divided. Give a short name to each group: 1)…..; 2)…..; 3)…… Write above the word the number of the group it belongs to.
Fun, cheerful, had fun;
walk, walking, walked;
labor, labor, labored;
laughter, funny, laughed.
- Read the poem. Identify the parts of speech that are familiar to you. Briefly write down which independent parts of speech are not in the poem.
Snow covered the hay
Through the cracks in the ceiling.
I stirred up the hay
And he met a moth.
Moth, moth
Saved myself from death
Climbing into the hayloft,
Survived and wintered.
Users often search on the Internet for a way to parse sentences into parts of speech online. This is necessary not only for schoolchildren when preparing homework, but also for people studying philology and linguistics at universities. And also for everyone who has to work with text every day. To parse a sentence, a person must have the necessary knowledge in this area. To facilitate this process, you can turn to special online services. Below we will look at several of the best sites for automatically parsing sentences into parts of speech.
Such analysis in primary and secondary schools is usually called “analysis by sentence members.” Sometimes they say “parsing a sentence by composition,” but this expression is somewhat incorrect, because it is customary to parse words by composition.
To parse a sentence:
The presence of syntactic structures of a sentence, its parameters, as well as a wealth of design options create great obstacles for application developers when creating an online service for parsing sentences. Therefore, there are not so many such services on the network. But they still exist.
Goldlit – service for morphological and syntactic parsing of sentences
Very convenient Goldlit service. A simple design and clear interface make the site accessible to people with different levels of computer knowledge. At the top line of the menu there are 3 items with a drop-down list.
Online service - goldlit.ru - Main menu – a list of the main sections of the site.
- Literature - in the drop-down menu there is a list of Russian and foreign literature, as well as an analysis of poems - what the poet wants to say in them.
- Chronology – literature arranged by century.
To use sentence parsing by parts of speech on the goldlit.ru service:
- Go to the website - http://goldlit.ru/.
- Under the menu there is a line in which you need to enter text for parsing.
- Next to the text input window there is a “Parse” button.
Immediately below the text entry line, in the yellow field, blocks with parsing appear in a row downwards. Each block is one word from a sentence. They alternate in the same order as words alternate in a sentence. Block parts:
- A word that is in the initial form.
- The second line is the part of speech, which is the word.
- Grammar. Number, quality, animate form, gender, etc. are written separated by commas.
- Forms. All existing forms of the word (with prefixes, suffixes, endings).
Seosin is a site that has a service for parsing sentences by parts of speech
One of the well-known resources on the Internet that provides a tool for online morphological analysis of sentences. In addition to this, the site offers other services for working with text, for example -. And also for working with other files, such as images and photography. The site periodically has problems with access, although the administrator writes in announcements on the site that the situation with the server has been corrected.
To check the text in the service:
- Follow this link - http://www.seosin.ru/.
- Enter the text to be analyzed in the service field.
- Click the Analyze button.
In a few seconds you will be provided with an analysis of your text with explanations.
Other sites for parsing sentences by parts of speech
In addition to automatic online services, there are also special sites that provide all the necessary information that is required for syntactic and morphological analysis of a sentence. One of such sites is Septemberata.rf. It will be indispensable for schoolchildren. As for the Russian language, here you will find sections: 
- Word – basic spelling of words with prepositions, particles, word hyphenation, etc. ().
- Together or separately – adjectives, nouns, conjunctions, interjections.
- Unstressed particles “Not” and “Ni”
- Rules for writing consonants - double “nn”, “zhzh”.
- Consonants that are written after hissing ones - “zh, ch, sh, sch.”
- Vowel spelling.
- Unstressed main ones.
- The letters "ь" and "ъ".
- Offer.
- Abbreviations.
- Capital letters.
