One in the field is not a similar warrior. What does the expression “one man in the field is no warrior” mean? There is safety in numbers

People with early childhood They are taught that they should have many friends. They must behave well not only in society, but also good reputation, and this continues almost all my life. In all why? Because alone in the field is not a warrior. But we will explore what this saying means in this article.

Firefighter

There are such forms human activity, in which there is nothing to do alone: firefighters, police, doctors. In these professions, no matter how brilliant an individual may be, he cannot cope without a team.

Imagine a house is on fire. A fireman runs to rescue people trapped by the fire. Even if we have a very good attitude towards the hero, we are unlikely to believe that he can fight on his own without a team, because he is not a warrior alone in the field. He at least needs partners to provide him with water and insurance just in case something happens.

Policeman

A lonely policeman is, rather, a hero of crime series. You probably watched them on NTV. IN real life Such heroes are hardly to be found. The maximum that a trained riot policeman can do is to pacify a gang of hooligans, but our Russian man cannot boast of feats in the spirit of the famous action movie icons of the 90s. And not even because he is bad; our man, maybe, will give a head start Hollywood actors, but only here they operate in an ideal world, where even bandits have some kind of moral principles, albeit minimal ones, and our riot policeman fights crime in the real world, and here he is not a warrior alone in the field.

Doctor

What is true of firefighters and rescuers can also be said of doctors. There are wonderful surgeons, they have golden hands, but they need good team near.

Let's take the fictional genius diagnostician Dr. Gregory House. He unraveled many complex cases, but his assistants did all the “dirty work” for him. Although, if you don’t pay attention to the details, then House is a lone hero, but this is only at first glance. And even a crazy and cynical doctor is not a warrior alone in the field.

Professions created for singles. Writer

True, it cannot be said that an individual person has no chance to change something in the world. There are professions where other people provide only technical support. In some professions, loneliness is a prerequisite for any success. This is the job of a teacher or a writer. Of course, the above-mentioned ones need a social field for implementation, but representatives of these types of activities change everything themselves. The role of the publisher who noticed and released cult book, but, firstly, he did not write it himself, and secondly, he did it not out of the kindness of his heart, but because he saw a commercial and, perhaps, some other meaning in it. Thus, the proverb “there is only one warrior in the field” could be invented by the writer in revenge on the majority.

Teacher

Teachers also need educational institution in order to translate their talent into something material, but the leaders of these “temples of knowledge”, as a rule, do not help a capable person, but hinder him. Because superiors always have their own tasks, and rarely are they so far-sighted as to free talented person from some not very important tasks for the fulfillment of his mission. Thus, the teacher withstands double pressure: on the one hand, the social environment, and on the other hand, the pangs of creativity.

Fiction versus real life. Why do audiences like action films so much?

Why were tough guys from action movies so popular in the past? Now there are more and more superheroes acting on screens ( iron Man, Spider-Man, etc.), the tone has changed. The viewer is no longer so naive; he does not believe that the aging Jean-Claude Vam Damme will scatter all the bandits with his fighting skill. Now, to become and be a hero, you need serious equipment.

No matter who shines on the screen, the viewer still goes. Because he wants to believe: one person can still change something in the world. Besides, we never really grow up, which means we love fairy tales just as much as before.

On the contrary, brave schoolchildren, and not only them, can say: “There is only one warrior in the field!” We’ll write an essay about this!” We can only wish them good luck in this difficult task. As we have seen, in life it can be both ways. A person can become a member of a well-coordinated team or try to change something alone. The main thing is to choose the right sphere of application of your strength, because all paths are open.

There is safety in numbers. meaning of the proverb and examples))) plzzzz

Liudmila sharukhia

It is difficult for one person to survive, to achieve anything, to win the fight. It is said to justify someone’s powerlessness, inability to cope with a matter, or as a reproach for the inability to act together.

The proverb is originally Russian. Its original meaning is clarified on the basis of an older version - Alone in the field, do not ratay, where ratay (from orati - to plow) is a plowman, a farmer. The proverb referred to agricultural work requiring several workers. Then the word ratay was replaced by consonance with warrior, and such a replacement was also prepared by stable folklore associations of the military field, the battlefield with the field of peaceful labor. The word warrior was synonymously replaced by governor and warrior. Based on the antonymic opposition, a new version of the proverb was formed - And there is only one warrior in the field.
http://www.poskart.ru/odin-ne-voin.html

“Alone in the field is not a warrior” how do you understand this?

Happy

“Alone in the field is no warrior” is an original Russian proverb that has survived to this day in a somewhat distorted form. The thing is that in the original version, instead of the word “warrior” there was “ratai” (in other words - plowman). As you can see, the proverb had an agricultural bias and encouraged collective work. Subsequently, the word “ratai” was apparently replaced by the consonant word “ratnik” (an outdated name for a warrior). By the way, it is in this version that this proverb appears in Alexander Herzen’s work “Who is to Blame?” . And although the bias has changed in the military direction, the meaning of the phrase still remains the same - it is quite difficult for one person to achieve success in business, only through cohesion and coordination between team members can a high result be obtained.

In conclusion, I would like to add that some sources mentioned another, expanded version of this proverb - “Alone in the field is not a warrior, but a traveler.” Why the second part did not catch on in circulation is not entirely clear to me. Although this is far from the only case of abbreviation of proverbs. Remember at least another one, no less famous proverb- “Two boots are a pair, but both are left.”

Come up with content and give a speech-reasoning on the following topic: One in the field is not a warrior. help me please

Dianochka Savelyeva

ALONE IN THE FIELD IS NOT A WARRIOR (not a warrior). It is difficult to do everything alone; you cannot do what can be done together. Wed. You cannot tie a knot with one hand; It’s okay for one person to have porridge; One grieves at home, but two fight in the field; One fly can't eat your belly. [Dolgay] won all the bets, not letting anyone die, he raked pennies and dimes from the board - and every time the whole crowd laughed, everyone had fun from his sayings, except perhaps one loser; but alone in the field is not a warrior; one walked sadly aside, another took his place, but Dolgai remained in harmony with the crowd. Dahl, Unprecedented in the Past. “Your Majesty’s will will be carried out, and I firmly hope that Ignatius Brianchaninov will prove useful wherever you wish to appoint him.” “I’m very glad, but I regret that he’s the only one: alone in the field, he’s not a warrior.” - With him there is his friend - the same strict monk - Chikhachev. Leskov, Unmercenary Engineers. The Samosad old men finally ratted out the hated chief manager, who, in retaliation, took away all their pastures and... , closed the Krutyash copper mine.. “But I don’t care,” repeated Golikovsky, who felt that he had no choice but to flee the factories. - Alone in the field is not a warrior. Mamin-Sibiryak, Three ends. - What can I do? - I told her. “You can’t be a warrior alone in the field, and I’ve never experienced such loneliness as I do now.” I would give a lot to find at least one person in the whole district on whom I could rely. Chekhov, Wife. - If you alone do this, then this, of course, will not be enough. But the idea, the example, is important. You are one of the most respected people in the city; your initiative may at first cause bewilderment, but then it will find imitators. That’s why we can’t achieve anything because everyone is guided by a false but very convenient proverb: “Alone in the field is no warrior. Veresaev, Without a road. - Kids! - Pugachev shouted hotly and self-confidently, as always in conversations with people. - You now know, children, my royal will. Just feel that I alone cannot do anything without your help. There is safety in numbers. Shishkov, Emelyan Pugachev. Is it possible to live without the right people, Krutilich! This, by the way, is your main mistake in life. You are a loner. And one in the field is not a warrior. Kochetov, Brothers Ershov. People are organizing such sabotage, printing leaflets, putting up posters, and all I can do is run my mouth. There is safety in numbers. . Yes, it's very difficult for you. Whatever you say, he worked as a driver for the Gestapo. Popov, Steel boiled. The Germans conquered all around. Where will you go, who will you complain to? The Tsar, and that half-German. Only Speransky, a Russian popovich, is smart, but he’s not a warrior alone in the field. E. Fedorov, Stone Belt. I'm definitely our hero folk tales, which I used to translate for you, walked along all the crossroads and shouted: “Is there a man alive in the field? But the living man did not respond... my misfortune!. . And one in the field is not a warrior. Herzen, Who is to blame?
- Snegirev: Alone in the field is not a warrior (ratai); Dahl: Alone in the field is not a warrior; Rybnikova: Alone in the field is not a warrior.

(meaning) - it is pointless for one person, or in a significant minority, to fight an enemy outnumbered. We need to look for another solution.

The proverb is listed in the book " " (1853) (section - " "). There is also a similar proverb - “You can’t tie a knot with one hand.”

The word “field” used to be understood not only in our usual meaning, but also “A place occupied by an army, under open air, camp camp" ((1863-1866)). Accordingly, in the proverb we're talking about about a battlefield in which one person cannot cope with the enemy’s army.

Examples

(1896 - 1984)

“Conversations with Ranevskaya” (Gleb Skorokhodov, 2004): “While filming was going on, I was rushing about, angry, still hoping that suddenly something would come out: in the cinema, it happens, and one warrior in the field. "

(1844 - 1927)

"", . Volume 1 "From the notes of a judicial figure" (Publishing house "Legal Literature", Moscow, 1966):

“The unfortunate Kroneberg, seeing the complete lack of support from the ministry and the insolent triumph of the government, gave up on everything and, apparently, said to himself, in this case not without reason, that “ there is safety in numbers»."

(1828 - 1910)

"Hadji Murat"

(1821 - 1881)

"Humiliated and Offended"- Masloboev says to Ivan:

"I have rules: I know, for example, that there is safety in numbers, and - I get the job done."

(1860 - 1904)

" " (1891), ch. I: “Once during breakfast, my clerk Vladimir Prokhorych reported to me that the Pestrovsky men had already begun to tear off thatched roofs to feed the cattle. Marya Gerasimovna looked at me with fear and bewilderment.

What can I do? - I told her. - and I have never experienced such loneliness as now. I would give a lot to find at least one person in the whole district on whom I could rely."

Images

The meaning of the proverb “Alone in the field is no warrior”

This old Russian proverb belongs to the category of those that suggest several versions of their origin. According to one of them, in this phrase a replacement of concepts occurred due to their consonance. It is assumed that the original expression sounded like “Don’t fight alone in the field.” The word “rataj” at the time the proverb appeared meant a plowman who alone would not be able to plow a large field. “Ratay” turned out to be consonant with the word “warrior,” that is, a member of the army, an irregular peasant military unit. Subsequently, the “army” was transformed into an “army”, and the “warrior” into a “warrior”.

The second version indicates that the concept of “field” included not only agricultural significance, but also military significance. Accordingly, a single person who appeared on the battlefield automatically became an easy target, more likely a victim than a warrior.

There is a third version, according to which this proverb has a continuation: “Alone in the field is not a warrior, but a traveler.” This refers to a later period in history, when major internecine wars ceased and travelers were able to travel between cities relatively safely alone.

The common school interpretation of the appearance of the expression “Alone in the field is not a warrior” is interesting. It says that the problem of combating Tatar-Mongol yoke It was precisely the fragmentation of the Russian principalities and their constant civil strife. Victory turned out to be possible precisely when several of them united under pressure from Dmitry Donskoy.

IN modern conditions The proverb “Alone in the field is no warrior” usually calls for collective action as obviously more successful. There are other Russian expressions that correspond in meaning to this one: “You can’t tie a knot with one hand,” “You can’t move a stone with one hand, but with peace you can move a mountain.”

The closest foreign analogues are “One man, no man” (English), “Einer ist keiner” (German).

Interesting fact. Currently, proverbs with the opposite meaning “And there is only one warrior in the field”, “Alone, but dear - there is no need for forty” are becoming more and more popular.

Firefighter

There are forms of human activity in which there is nothing to do alone: firefighters, police, doctors. In these professions, no matter how brilliant an individual may be, he cannot cope without a team.

Policeman

A lonely policeman is, rather, a hero of crime series. You probably watched them on NTV. In real life, such heroes are unlikely to be found. The maximum that a trained riot policeman can do is to pacify a gang of hooligans, but our Russian man cannot boast of feats in the spirit of the famous action movie icons of the 90s. And not even because he is bad; our man, perhaps, will give Hollywood actors a head start, but only they act in an ideal world, where even bandits have some kind of moral principles, albeit minimal, and our riot policeman fights crime in the real world, and here alone in the field is not a warrior.

Doctor

What is true of firefighters and rescue workers can also be said of doctors. There are wonderful surgeons, they have golden hands, but they need a good team nearby.

Let's take the fictional genius diagnostician Dr. Gregory House. He unraveled many complex cases, but his assistants did all the “dirty work” for him. Although if you don’t pay attention to the details, then House is a lone hero, but this is only at first glance. And even a crazy and cynical doctor is not a warrior alone in the field.

Professions created for singles. Writer

True, it cannot be said that an individual person has no chance to change something in the world. There are professions where other people provide only technical support. In some professions, loneliness is a prerequisite for any success. This is the job of a teacher or a writer. Of course, the above-mentioned ones need a social field for implementation, but representatives of these types of activities change everything themselves. The role of the publisher is great, who noticed and released a cult book, but, firstly, he did not write it himself, and secondly, he did it not out of the kindness of his heart, but because he saw it as commercial, and perhaps some kind of that still makes sense. Thus, the proverb “there is only one warrior in the field” could be invented by the writer in revenge on the majority.

Teacher

Teachers also need an educational institution in order to translate their talent into something material, but the leaders of these “temples of knowledge”, as a rule, do not help a capable person, but hinder him. Because superiors always have their own tasks, and they are rarely so far-sighted as to free a talented person from some not very important tasks to fulfill his mission. Thus, the teacher withstands double pressure: on the one hand, the social environment, and on the other hand, the pangs of creativity.

Fiction versus real life. Why do audiences like action films so much?

Why were tough guys from action movies so popular in the past? Now there are more and more superheroes on screen (Iron Man, Spider-Man, etc.), the tone has changed. The viewer is no longer so naive; he does not believe that the aging Jean-Claude Vam Damme will scatter all the bandits with his fighting skill. Now, to become and be a hero, you need serious equipment.

Fairy tales are different.

Russian Rambo? The film when the phrase “The Red Army is the strongest” even wins common sense? Screenwriter... If I could blame everything on him... I'll start with what offended me the most. Previously, when filming films about the war, they always invited a military consultant, and a military historian at that. Things are much worse here. The Wehrmacht soldiers who conquered Europe on the screen behave more stupidly than bots in some shooter on Novice difficulty. Not only do they know nothing about tactics or targeted shooting, and using cover is not for immortals, but they are also simply blind. Try with your friends to repeat GG’s trick when he hid behind a motorcycle sidecar, and the brave fascists walked right past the sidecar and...DID NOT NOTICE the fighter. The ninja, who have not yet committed hara-kiri out of frustration, are smoking nervously in the corner. Should trucks with valuable cargo be guarded among a crowd of wounded enemy soldiers? For what? The posted security allows the GG to go there and back every time. The brave general learned that his group, sent to clear the hospital, was destroyed, and there were 30 more nearby! Germans, from his modest guard directs a group to capture the landing... A strategist, you can’t take that away, no worse than a military doctor, who, having learned that the Germans are heading to the hospital, sends the last ones capable of holding weapons in their hands to an unknown village for help, and that’s then when NO ONE knows where the Germans are and where the Soviet soldiers are, and only because things didn’t work out with men. But let's return to the capture group, having killed two Russians, having discovered that one is wearing a pilot's jacket, they understand that this is the landing force that destroyed 30+ of their brothers.
What? Pilot and landing force. Everything is connected. And they mistake for the older dead man without insignia, but in a flight jacket, and not the living GG lying next to him with captain's shoulder straps... And, having finished off everyone in the previous scenes, they leave without touching the GG and deciding that their task is completed. The military doctor basically doesn’t know about the Hippocratic Oath. This film is generally characterized by illogical and unjustified actions. And it’s clear that the actors are trying, but... the aspen tree will not produce oranges. I remembered Zhvanetsky’s monologue: “Behind the scenes they say that half of Europe works for them, and even their generals have uniforms that don’t fit.” The major is clearly dressed differently, or his figure has undergone significant changes since 1941... Gentlemen, if you are filming a fairy tale, then the dose of absurdity should not foam into the viewer’s eyes. This is not a film about war, unfortunately. This is not a fairy tale about war. Unfortunately. This... Thanks for trying, but it didn't work.

Field. There's a warrior in him

One in the field is not a warrior - a dubious statement that one person is powerless in his desire to somehow change this life

The expression “one man in the field is no warrior” loudly echoes the Soviet doctrine, which denies the role of the individual in history. They say that history is driven by the masses, the people who themselves, albeit involuntarily, choose their leader. And this leader only submits to the will of the majority

"One! - Who needs it?!"
The voice of one is thinner than a squeak.
Who will hear her? - Is it a wife?
And then if not at the market, but close...
It's bad for a person when he is alone.
Woe to one, one is not a warrior -
every stalwart is his master,
and even weak ones, if two...
One is nonsense,
one - zero,
one - even if very important -
a simple five-inch log will not lift,
especially a five-story house" (V. Mayakovsky, poem "Vladimir Ilyich Lenin)

“We didn’t create a scandal - we lacked a leader.
There are few truly violent ones - that's why there are no leaders."

- another argues with the great poet great poet V. Vysotsky (“Letter to the Editor”)

Indeed, the whole story refutes the underestimation of the role of the individual in it. Even the French are unlikely to name leaders right away, so what is her fate? And it was carried out under the banner of Lenin, the Great Patriotic War won under the banner of Stalin, happened under the banner of Yeltsin.
No, and there is only one warrior in the field, if he is an individual, if he is able to lead people, because the people are a faceless mass, a crowd, a herd. It goes where the leader leads and does what he tells it to do.

“On March 7, troops quickly sent against Napoleon arrived in Grenoble - two and a half linear infantry regiments with artillery and one hussar regiment. Napoleon was already approaching Grenoble. The most critical moment was approaching. There is no talk about the battle against all these regiments, also equipped with artillery It was out of the question. The royal troops could have shot him and his soldiers from afar, without even losing a single man, because Napoleon did not have a single gun. On the morning of March 7, Napoleon arrived in the village of Lamur. Troops in battle formation were visible in the distance. , blocking the road... Napoleon looked through the telescope for a long time at the troops advanced against him. Then he ordered his soldiers to take their guns. left hand and turn the muzzle into the ground. "Forward!" - he commanded and walked ahead right under the guns of the advanced battalion of the royal troops lined up against him. The commander of this battalion looked at his soldiers, turned to the adjutant of the garrison commander and said to him, pointing to his soldiers: “What should I do? Look at them, they are pale as death and trembling at the mere thought of having to shoot this man.” He ordered the battalion to retreat, but they did not have time. Napoleon ordered 50 of his cavalrymen to stop the battalion preparing to retreat. “Friends, don’t shoot! - the cavalrymen shouted. “Here is the emperor!” The battalion stopped. Then Napoleon came close to the soldiers, who froze with guns at the ready, not taking their eyes off the lone figure in a gray frock coat and triangular hat approaching them with a firm step. “Soldiers of the fifth regiment! - rang out amid the dead silence. “Do you recognize me?” - "Yes Yes Yes!" - they shouted from the ranks. Napoleon unbuttoned his coat and opened his chest. “Which of you wants to shoot your emperor? Shoot! Eyewitnesses until the end of their days could not forget those thunderous joyful cries with which the soldiers, having upset the front, rushed to Napoleon" (E. Tarle, chapter "100 days")

Application of the expression in literature

—

No one would have protected her from the wrath of the chief designer: the director, laughing, always justified him, the party organizer did not interfere, the chairman of the factory committee - well...

—

Just feel that I alone, without your help, cannot do anything. ... - We smell it, father!..”

—

It’s clear to me now - to the point of horror: I was - alone, like a finger; but I consoled myself with a social fiction, as if there were some friends who understood me here; They didn’t want to understand me here: neither Vladimirov, nor S.M. Solovyov, not to mention my course comrades...

—

You can't make people free under pressure. . And I am alone, there are no helpers"

—

Although the enemy abandoned all direct resistance, waiting for us to retreat, there was a Chechen who, contrary to the proverb, decided to defend the crossing of Aksai with the help of Allah and his rifle.”

People are taught from early childhood that they should have many friends. They must behave well not only in society, they need a good reputation, and this continues almost all their lives. In all why? Because alone in the field is not a warrior. But we will explore what this saying means in this article.

Policeman

Doctor

What is true of firefighters and rescue workers can also be said of doctors. There are wonderful surgeons, they have golden hands, but they need a good team nearby.

Professions created for singles. Writer

True, it cannot be said that an individual person has no chance to change something in the world. There are professions where other people provide only technical support. In some professions, loneliness is a prerequisite for any success. This is the job of a teacher or a writer. Of course, the above-mentioned ones need a social field for implementation, but representatives of these types of activities change everything themselves. The role of the publisher is great, who noticed and released a cult book, but, firstly, he did not write it himself, and secondly, he did it not out of the kindness of his heart, but because he saw it as commercial, and perhaps some kind of that still makes sense. Thus, the proverb “there is only one warrior in the field” could be invented by the writer in revenge on the majority.

Teacher

Fiction versus real life. Why do audiences like action films so much?

There is safety in numbers(meaning) - it is pointless for one person, or in a significant minority, to fight an enemy outnumbered. We need to look for another solution.

The proverb is listed in the book “Proverbs of the Russian People” by V.I. Dahl (1853) (section - “Loneliness”). A similar proverb is also indicated there: “You can’t tie a knot with one hand.”

The word “field” used to be understood not only in its usual meaning, but also as “a place occupied by an army, in the open air, a camp camp” ( Dictionary living Great Russian language (1863-1866) V.I. Dahl). Accordingly, the proverb refers to a battlefield in which one person cannot cope with the enemy’s army.

Images

Examples

Ranevskaya Faina Georgievna

Koni Anatoly Fedorovich

“THE ROYAL TRAIN WRECK IN 1888”, Collected works in eight volumes. Volume 1 “From the notes of a judicial figure” (Publishing house “Legal Literature”, Moscow, 1966):

L.N. Tolstoy "Hadji Murat"

Dostoevsky F.M.

"Humiliated and Offended"— Masloboev says to Ivan:

“I have rules: I know, for example, that there is safety in numbers, and - I get the job done.”

Chekhov Anton Pavlovich (1860 - 1904)

"The Wife" (1891), ch. I: “Once during breakfast, my clerk Vladimir Prokhorych reported to me that the Pestrovsky men had already begun to tear off thatched roofs to feed the cattle. Marya Gerasimovna looked at me with fear and bewilderment.

- What can I do? - I told her. — There is safety in numbers, and I have never experienced such loneliness as now. I would give a lot to find at least one person in the whole district on whom I could rely.”

Additionally

The book “Proverbs of the Russian People” (1853), V.I. Dahl

Explanatory dictionary of the living Great Russian language (1863-1866) V.I. Dahl

Phrases about people

Army, war

“Burnt on milk, blows on water too“

Meaning: someone who has once made a mistake becomes overly cautious. It speaks of someone's excessive caution or caution caused by past experience.
Examples from the literature:
1) “We probably got burned with Semyonov,” Kapitonich muttered, frowning. - And having burned yourself on milk, you blow on water (K. Sedykh, “Dauria”);
2) - What kind did he give me? useful tips... especially... especially about relationships with women. - Aha! He burned himself on his own milk, he blows on someone else’s water (I. Turgenev, “Fathers and Sons”);
3) - Didn’t get married? - What are you talking about, she avoids men on principle. Burnt herself on boiling milk, blows on spring water! (A. Avdeenko, “By the sweat of his brow...”).

“The game is not worth the candle“

The process of processing (dressing) skins involves a lot of time and labor. There is no point in dressing a bad skin, since the processing costs will not be recouped.
Meaning: the matter is not worth the money and effort spent on it. It is said when time, effort or money is wasted on a matter that does not deserve attention.
Examples from the literature:
1) I covered almost the entire paper, and in terms of the number of scenes I wrote, I’m not inferior to three big dramas. I am afraid of one thing, that the game is not worth the candle (V. Nemirovich-Danchenko, “Letter to A.I. Sumbatov” (Yuzhin), July 21, 1887);
2) Specialists, showing their possessions, operate with a lot of numbers. The fact is that, in principle, you can get any plant without soil, provided there is food and moisture. The main thing is whether, as they say, the game is worth the candle... (Pravda newspaper, June 8, 1975).

“There is safety in numbers“

Meaning: alone, it is difficult for one person to achieve anything, cope with great job. It is said as an excuse for someone’s powerlessness, inability to cope with a big task, or as a reproach for the inability to act in a team, together.
Examples from the literature:
1) - What can I do? - I told her. - Alone in the field is not a warrior, and I have never experienced such loneliness as now (A. Chekhov, “The Wife”);
2) This, by the way, is your main mistake in life. You are a loner. And one in the field is not a warrior (V. Kochetov, “The Ershov Brothers”);
3) The Moscow defense, led by Lev Yashin, saved their goal. As for the guests, the only truly dangerous player in their attack was midfielder Valery Maslov. But the proverb “Alone in the field is no warrior” in this case was confirmed once again. The game ended without result - 0:0 (Newspaper “ TVNZ”, November 5, 1965).

“One for all and all for one or All for one, one for all“

The meaning: everyone supports the other, everyone helps each other. It talks about a sense of collectivism, mutual assistance, mutual assistance.
Examples from the literature:
1) - I want every person, even in school, to feel the holy law of collectivism: one for all, all for one (V. Tendryakov, “Behind the Running Day”);
2) Once, for a whole month, the team worked with an incomplete team - two turners and a mechanic fell ill. Nevertheless, the plan was completed on time. Recalling this difficult test, site foreman Sergei Nikolaevich Krasnykh says: “The Zakharovites have a sense of comradeship.” They are like one family. All for one, one for all. In this brigade, the personal and the general are inseparable. Everyone works, putting a piece of their soul and heart into the business (I. Osipov, “Back to Dynamo”);
3) - People are close friends at the front. All for one, one for all. They do not regret their lives for their comrades (V. Popov, “The Steel Boiled”).

1. They don’t seek good from goodness
2. Language will bring you to Kyiv
3. What is written with a pen cannot be cut down with an ax
4. It doesn’t get any easier hour by hour.
5. Let’s sit side by side and talk well

To home

Often people think that winning or success requires a numerical superiority over an opponent or just a bunch of people united by one goal. However, this misconception only slows down the process and provides an excuse for doing nothing. In fact, there is only one warrior in the field, because all great things begin with a lone leader in whom no one believes. And only then, after years and centuries, the majority is able to appreciate the feat of the minority.

Gorky’s story “Old Woman Izergil” describes the fate of Danko, a national leader who single-handedly led his people out of the dark thicket, which in the language of allegory means ignorance. This is the image of a brave revolutionary who is ahead of his time and is bringing the future closer. However, other people do not understand him and are afraid, so the young man receives nothing from them except reproaches. He, despite the condemnation, follows his own path and leads the tribe. When there was absolutely no way to deal with him, Danko tore out his heart and illuminated the path to freedom for his doubting fellow tribesmen. He managed to stand alone in this painful battle with prejudices, but at the cost of his life. His feat, of course, was not recognized and consigned to oblivion, so loneliness was his lot even after death, but he achieved his goal.

Another example was described by Griboedov in “Woe from Wit.” Chatsky went against Famusov society, rebelled against stagnation and injustice. Yes, he was alone in the camp of enemies, but this did not stop him from alarming the house where he was received so unkindly. Alexander unleashed such a barrage of criticism against those around him that even the most hardened cynics were frightened by his speeches. Moreover, the future proved that a lone warrior became a pioneer and planted the seeds of progress in " dark kingdom» Moscow salons. His sermon and denunciation “Who are the judges?” people still memorize them, realizing the wisdom and purity of these lines.

Thus, one person can change the entire society, if only he has the strength to withstand the atmosphere of hostility and misunderstanding, which will undoubtedly be his main rival on the path to his dream.