The history of the emergence of the Tatar people. Origin of the name "Tatars"

Tatars(self-name - Tat. Tatar, tatar, plural Tatarlar, tatarlar) - a Turkic people living in the central regions of the European part of Russia, in the Volga region, the Urals, Siberia, Kazakhstan, Central Asia, Xinjiang, Afghanistan and the Far East.

Tatars are the second largest ethnic group ( ethnoc- ethnic community) after Russians and most numerous people Muslim culture V Russian Federation, where the main area of ​​their settlement is the Volga-Ural region. Within this region, the largest Tatar groups are concentrated in the Republic of Tatarstan and the Republic of Bashkortostan.

Language, writing

According to many historians, the Tatar people with a single literary and practically common spoken language emerged during the existence of the huge Turkic state - the Golden Horde. The literary language in this state was the so-called “idel terkise” or Old Tatar, based on the Kipchak-Bulgar (Polovtsian) language and incorporating elements of Central Asian literary languages. The modern literary language based on the middle dialect arose in the second half of the 19th and early 20th centuries.

In ancient times, the Turkic ancestors of the Tatars used runic writing, as evidenced by archaeological finds in the Urals and Middle Volga region. Since the voluntary adoption of Islam by one of the ancestors of the Tatars, the Volga-Kama Bulgars, the Tatars used Arabic writing, from 1929 to 1939 - Latin script, and since 1939 they have used the Cyrillic alphabet with additional characters.

The earliest surviving literary monument in the old Tatar literary language (Kul Gali’s poem “Kyisa-i Yosyf”) was written in the 13th century. From the second half of the 19th century. The modern Tatar literary language begins to take shape, which by the 1910s had completely replaced the old Tatar language.

The modern Tatar language, belonging to the Kipchak-Bulgar subgroup of the Kipchak group of the Turkic language family, is divided into four dialects: middle (Kazan Tatar), western (Mishar), eastern (language of the Siberian Tatars) and Crimean (language of the Crimean Tatars). Despite dialectal and territorial differences, the Tatars are a single nation with a single literary language, a single culture - folklore, literature, music, religion, national spirit, traditions and rituals.

Even before the 1917 coup, the Tatar nation occupied one of the leading places in the world in terms of literacy level (the ability to write and read in its own language). Russian Empire. The traditional thirst for knowledge has survived in the current generation.

The Tatars, like any large ethnic group, have a rather complex internal structure and consist of three ethno-territorial groups: Volga-Ural, Siberian, Astrakhan Tatars and the sub-confessional community of baptized Tatars. By the beginning of the 20th century, the Tatars went through a process of ethnic consolidation ( ConsolidAtion[lat. consolidatio, from con (cum) - together, at the same time and solido - compacting, strengthening, merging], strengthening, strengthening something; unification, rallying of individuals, groups, organizations to strengthen the struggle for common goals).

The folk culture of the Tatars, despite its regional variability (it varies among all ethnic groups), is fundamentally the same. The vernacular Tatar language (consisting of several dialects) is fundamentally unified. From the 18th to the beginning of the 20th centuries. A national (so-called “high”) culture with a developed literary language emerged.

The consolidation of the Tatar nation was strongly influenced by the high migration activity of Tatars from the Volga-Ural region. So, by the beginning of the 20th century. 1/3 of the Astrakhan Tatars consisted of immigrants, and many of them were mixed (through marriages) with local Tatars. The same situation was observed in Western Siberia, where by the end of the 19th century. about 1/5 of the Tatars came from the Volga and Urals regions, who also intensively mixed with the indigenous Siberian Tatars. Therefore, today it is almost impossible to identify “pure” Siberian or Astrakhan Tatars.

The Kryashens are distinguished by their religious affiliation - they are Orthodox. But all other ethnic parameters unite them with other Tatars. In general, religion is not an ethnic-forming factor. Basic elements The traditional culture of the baptized Tatars is the same as that of other neighboring groups of Tatars.

Thus, the unity of the Tatar nation has deep cultural roots, and today the presence of Astrakhan, Siberian Tatars, Kryashens, Mishars, Nagaibaks has a purely historical and ethnographic significance and cannot serve as a basis for identifying independent peoples.

The Tatar ethnic group has an ancient and bright story, closely connected with the history of all the peoples of the Ural-Volga region and Russia as a whole.

The original culture of the Tatars has worthily entered the treasury of world culture and civilization.

We find traces of it in the traditions and languages ​​of the Russians, Mordvins, Mari, Udmurts, Bashkirs, and Chuvashs. At the same time, the national Tatar culture synthesizes the achievements of the Turkic, Finno-Ugric, Indo-Iranian peoples (Arabs, Slavs and others).

Tatars are one of the most mobile peoples. Due to landlessness, frequent crop failures in their homeland and the traditional desire for trade, even before 1917 they began to move to various regions of the Russian Empire, including the provinces Central Russia, to the Donbass, Eastern Siberia and the Far East, the North Caucasus and Transcaucasia, Central Asia and Kazakhstan. This migration process intensified during the years of Soviet rule, especially during the “great construction projects of socialism.” Therefore, at present there is practically no federal subject in the Russian Federation where Tatars live. Even in the pre-revolutionary period, Tatar national communities were formed in Finland, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey, and China. As a result of the collapse of the USSR, Tatars who lived in the former Soviet republics - Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, Ukraine, and the Baltic countries - ended up in the near abroad. Already due to re-emigrants from China. In Turkey and Finland, since the mid-20th century, Tatar national diasporas have been formed in the USA, Japan, Australia, and Sweden.

Culture and life of the people

The Tatars are one of the most urbanized peoples of the Russian Federation. The social groups of the Tatars, living both in cities and in villages, are almost no different from those that exist among other peoples, especially Russians.

In their way of life, the Tatars do not differ from other surrounding peoples. The modern Tatar ethnic group arose in parallel with the Russian one. Modern Tatars are the Turkic-speaking part of the indigenous population of Russia, which, due to their greater territorial proximity to the East, chose Islam rather than Orthodoxy.

The traditional dwelling of the Tatars of the Middle Volga and Urals was a log hut, separated from the street by a fence. The external façade was decorated with multicolor paintings. The Astrakhan Tatars, who retained some of their steppe cattle-breeding traditions, used a yurt as a summer home.

Like many other peoples, the rituals and holidays of the Tatar people largely depended on the agricultural cycle. Even the names of the seasons were designated by a concept associated with a particular work.

Many ethnologists note the unique phenomenon of Tatar tolerance, which consists in the fact that in the entire history of the existence of the Tatars, they have not initiated a single conflict on ethnic and religious grounds. The most famous ethnologists and researchers are sure that tolerance is an invariable part of the Tatar national character.

TATA`RA, Turkic-speaking people; the main population of the Republic of Tatarstan (according to the 2002 census - 2.019 thousand people); the second largest indigenous people in the Russian Federation (in 2002 - 5669.9 thousand people).

History of the name (ethnonym). For the first time, the ethnonym Tatars appeared among the ancient Turkic tribes of Altai, Transbaikalia and Mongolia in the 6th – 8th centuries in the forms “otuz-Tatars” (“thirty Tatars”) and “tokuz-Tatars” (“nine Tatars”). In the 13th century in the Mongol Empire, the term "Tatars" denoted the aristocracy and was socially prestigious. In the Middle Ages, the term was used in Rus', Western Europe and the Muslim East to refer to the population of the Ulus of Jochi. As a result of the annexation of the Tatar khanates of the Volga-Ural region and Western Siberia (XVI - early XVII centuries) to the Russian state, their ethnopolitical system was destroyed, the territorial division of their single culture occurred, the declassification of the military service nobility and the Christianization of part of the population, which contributed to the introduction of the terms “Tatars” and “Muslims” among the masses. In the 2nd half of the 19th - early 20th centuries, during bourgeois reforms and the rise of the national socio-political movement, the concept of “Tatars” became common to a number of Turkic-speaking groups in the Volga-Ural region and Western Siberia. Local self-names were gradually lost: among the Volga-Ural Tatars - meselman, kazanly, mishar; among Astrakhan - nugai, karagash; among the Siberian ones - tubylyk, turaly, baraba; in Polish-Lithuanian x - meslim, sticky tatarlary. In the 1st quarter of the 20th century, the ethnonym “Tatars” became common to a significant part of the Turkic-speaking population of the Volga-Ural region and Western Siberia. According to the 1926 census, the majority of Turkic-speaking Muslims in the Volga region, the Urals (with the exception of the Bashkirs) and Western Siberia accepted this name.

Settlement. The core of the Tatar people was formed in the Volga and Urals regions. Constant migrations, especially of the Volga-Ural Tatars, led to an increase in their places of residence in Russia and the world. Mass migration began after the conquest of the Tatar khanates by the Russian state, which was associated with a sharp increase in national, social and religious oppression. IN late XIX century, more than 1 million Tatars lived in the Urals. In the 19th - early 20th centuries, the Volga-Ural Tatars became a noticeable ethnic component of the Tatar population of the Astrakhan Territory and Western Siberia.

In the 1920s and 30s, most of the Tatars lived in the RSFSR (95.2% in 1937). By 1959, their numbers outside the RSFSR had increased sharply, especially in Kazakhstan and Central Asia (in 1959 - 780 thousand people, including Crimean Tatars forcibly deported in 1944). The growth of the Tatar population in this region was also influenced by the development of virgin lands in Kazakhstan. By 1989, the largest Tatar diaspora in the USSR (1,179.5 thousand) had formed in the republics of Central Asia. According to the 2002 census, Tatars live compactly in the Volga-Ural region and Western Siberia, scattered in almost all regions of the Russian Federation. Tatars also live in countries near and far abroad.

Urbanization. The Tatars are one of the most urbanized peoples of the Russian Federation. The beginning of urbanization dates back to the periods of the Volga Bulgaria and the Golden Horde, in which there was a fairly developed network of cities and settlements. In the 2nd half of the 16th – early 17th centuries, after the annexation of the Tatar khanates to the Russian state, the urban stratum among the Tatars sharply decreased. After the reforms of the 1860s, the urbanization of the Tatar population increased. At the beginning of the 20th century, the urbanization of the Volga-Ural Tatars was 5%, the majority lived in Kazan, Ufa, Samara, Simbirsk, Saratov, Nizhny Novgorod, Yekaterinburg, Chelyabinsk, Astrakhan. In the 1930s–80s, due to the rapid development of industry and urban growth, more than half of the Tatars in the USSR became city dwellers (according to the 1989 census, 69% of Tatars).

Main ethno-territorial groups: Volga-Ural Tatars, Siberian Tatars, Astrakhan Tatars. The most numerous are the Volga-Ural Tatars, including the Kazan, Kasimov, Mishars, communities of baptized Tatars and Nagaibaks. Among the Siberian Tatars, there are ethnographic groups of Tobolsk, Tyumen, Barabinsk, Tomsk Tatars and the ethnic class Bukhara group. Astrakhan Tatars are divided into Yurt, Kundra and Karagash of Nogai origin. An independent group are the Polish-Lithuanian Tatars, formed as a community of military service Tatars who migrated from the Golden Horde and Tatar khanates to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the 14th–17th centuries.

Anthropology. According to anthropological typology, the Tatars are mainly classified as a member of the Ural group, which is transitional between the Caucasoid and Mongoloid races. Ethnically, they were formed by mixing the Caucasian population with Mongoloid components.

Colloquial. The colloquial language of the Tatars, formed over centuries, belongs to the Bulgaro-Kypchak group of Turkic languages. Includes Mishar, Middle and Eastern dialects. Within them there are a number of dialects. The colloquial language of the Tatars, which was formed together with the modern Tatar ethnos, has a number of features that unite the dialects of the Volga-Ural and Siberian Tatars and distinguish them from other Turkic languages. The language actively interacted with the languages ​​of neighboring peoples. During the period of formation and development, the Tatar language experienced significant influence from Arabic and Persian languages, which were the literary languages ​​of this state along with Volga Turkic during the period of the Golden Horde. The modern Tatar literary language was formed at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries on the basis of the colloquial dialect of the Kazan Tatars with the noticeable participation of the Mishar dialect. He experienced the ethnocultural influence of the Russian, Nogai, Chuvash, Bashkir, Mordovian, Mari and Udmurt peoples.

Writing. The origins of the Tatar written tradition date back to the ancient Turkic runic monuments of the 7th–11th centuries, the basis of which is the Orkhon-Yenisei script, used in Volga Bulgaria. With the adoption of Islam in 922, Arabic writing began to play a significant role in the official records of the Bulgars. The earliest surviving monument of Bulgarian literature is Kul Gali’s poem “The Tale of Yusuf” (1233). Since the beginning of the 14th century, Arabic writing has been used in the preparation of official documents. Until the 1st third of the 20th century, Arabic script was used. In 1928–29, the Arabographic alphabet was replaced by the Latin alphabet, and in 1939–40 by the Russian alphabet, created on the basis of the Russified Cyrillic alphabet. In 2000, the State Council of the Republic of Tajikistan adopted a law on the transition to the Latin script, but its practical implementation was stopped due to an amendment to the Federal Law “On the Languages ​​of the Peoples of the Russian Federation” (2002) on the inadmissibility in the territory. RF use in the state. languages ​​of the peoples of Russia in non-Cyrillic alphabets.

Religion. Believing Tatars are mainly followers of Sunni Islam. Religious centers are the muftiates in Moscow, Kazan, Ufa, Saratov, Astrakhan, Tyumen, whose leaders are united in the Council of Muftis of Russia and the Central Spiritual Administration of Muslims of Russia and European countries CIS. There are about 2.6 thousand Tatar-Muslim parishes (mahallas) in the Russian Federation. Russia is also home to small (about 35 thousand people in 2002) sub-confessional groups of Tatars (baptized, Nagaibaks), whose ancestors were Christianized in the 16th–18th centuries.

Basic concepts of origin. Naib. the earliest of them - Bulgaro-Tatar I theory, edges is based on the position that ethnic. the basis of T. was the Bulgars. community that developed in Wed. The Volga region and the Urals in the 8th century. (according to other versions, in the 8th–7th centuries BC and earlier). According to this concept, basic. ethnocult. traditions and ethnicity. features of modern Tatars (Bulgaro-Tatar) people formed in Volga Bulgaria (10th–13th centuries). During the periods of the Golden Horde, Tatars. khanates, Russian state (16th–19th centuries), they underwent only minor changes. Bulgar. principalities (emirates), being part of the Golden Horde, used this means. watered and cult. autonomy. The influence of the Horde ethnopolit. systems of power, as well as culture (in particular, literature, art and architecture) were purely external in nature. impact on the Bulgars. the society was not particularly noticeable. The most important consequence of Mong. conquests of the 13th century was the fragmentation of Bulgaria into a number of emirates and sultanates, as well as the collapse of the united Bulgars. nationalities on 2 ethnoterritories. groups (Bulgar-Burtas of Ulus Mukhsha and Bulgars of the Volga-Kama emirates). As supporters of this theory believe, during the period of the Kazan Khanate of the Bulgars. the ethnic group was strengthened by the early Domong. ethnocult. features and ethnically remained (including the self-called “Bulgars”) until the 1920s, when the Tatars. bourgeois nationalists and sovs. the ethnonym “T.” was imposed by the authorities. In their opinion, all other groups of T. (Sib., Astrakhan and Polish-Lithuanian) developed into independence. ethnocult. basis, are actually separate. ethnic groups and ethnic the histories of the Bulgaro-Tatars of the Volga-Ural region are not directly related. The concept is basically outlines was developed in con. 19 - beginning 20th centuries (works of H.-G. Gabyashi, G. Akhmarov, R. Fakhretdin and others). In the 1920s, with the advent of the theory of the stadial development of language and the autochthonous origin of peoples (Marr’s doctrine of language), it received further development in the works of scientists. period (N.N. Firsova, M.G. Khudyakova, etc.). In the 1920s and 30s, as the “Leninist-Stalinist” ideology was introduced into the Soviet Union. ist. and linguistic science, Bulgaro-Tatars. the concept became decisive in the fatherland. historiography (works of A.P. Smirnov, H.G. Gimadi, N.I. Vorobyov, N.F. Kalinin, L. Zalyay, etc.). After accepting the post. Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks " On the state and measures to improve mass political and ideological work in the Tatar party organization» from 9 Aug. 1944 and holding Scientific session of the USSR Academy of Sciences April 25–26 1946 on the question of the origin of the cauldron. T. this concept, which received official. support from the authorities began to play a primary role in the Tatars. and owls historiography. The most important stage ethnogenesis of the Tatars. people recognized the Bulgars. period, the point of view about the cultural-evolutionary continuity of the Bulgars and T. was established. Until the end. 1980s Bulgaro-Tatars. the concept was actively developed by historians, archaeologists and linguists G.V. Yusupov, A.Kh. Khalikov, M.Z. Zakiev, A.G. Karimullin, S.Kh. Alishev, R.Kh. Bariev, F.Sh. Khuzin, F.T.-A.Valeev, N.A. Tomilov and others.

Mongol-Tatar theory is based on the hypothesis of the resettlement of nomadic Turkic-Tatars and Mongolians to Europe. (Central Asian) ethnic. groups (according to some assumptions, in the pre-Mong., according to others - in the Golden Horde time), which, having mixed with the Kipchaks and adopted Islam during the Golden Horde period, created the basis of the modern. Tatars culture. Supporters of this theory deny or downplay the role of Volga Bulgaria and its culture in the history and culture of Kazan. T., arguing that it was an underdeveloped state with a relatively Muslim (semi-pagan) population. They believe that during the period of the Golden Horde b. including Bulgars. ethnic group was subjected to ethnocult. assimilation by the newcomer Muslimized Kipchak population with high mountains. culture, and the other part (mainly pagan Bulgars) moved to the outskirts of Bulgaria and subsequently became the basis Chuvash people. Some authors put forward the idea of ​​“Tatarization” of the population of the Eastern steppes. Europe and the Volga region, including Volga Bulgaria, back in pre-Mong. time. The concept arose in the beginning. 20th century grew up in work scientists (N.I. Ashmarin, V.F. Smolin, etc.), certain aspects of it were further developed in the works of the Tatars. emigrant historians (A.-Z. Validi, R. Rakhmati, etc.). Since the 1960s theory of the Mongol-Tatars. origin of the Tatars. people began to actively develop the Chuvash. (V.F. Kakhovsky, V.D. Dimitriev, N.I. Egorov, M.R. Fedotov, etc.), bashk. (N.A. Mazhitov and others) and Tatars. (R.G. Fakhrutdinov, M.I. Akhmetzyanov and others) scientists.

Turkic-Tatar theory T.'s origin indicates a broader ethnocult than the Ural-Volga region. area of ​​settlement of the Tatars. nation and is based on a new ethnological theory (constructivism, structuralism, new social history). Its supporters emphasize the Turkic-Tatars. origins of modern T., noting the important role of the Volga Bulgaria and the Kipchak-Kimaks ethnic groups in their ethnogenesis. steppe groups of Eurasia. As a key point, ethnicity. history of the Tatars. ethnic group is considered the period of the Golden Horde, when on the basis of the Mongol-Tatars. and local Bulgars. and Kipchak traditions, statehood, culture, literature were further developed. language, new sources have emerged. traditions and ethnopolitan. self-awareness in the form of the ethnonym “T.” During the Tatar period. khanates that arose after the collapse of the Golden Horde, a department was formed. ethnoterr. groups (Astrakhan, Kazan, Crimean, Sib. and other T. groups). A major role during this period, especially after the conquest of the Tatars. khanates, religion began to play. (Muslim) self-awareness. In the 2nd half. 19th century, in the process of active penetration of the bourgeoisie. social-economic relations in the Tatars. about the rise of the national culture and strengthening cultural-integration ties between different territories. groups of Tatars. ethnic group, ideas about cultural history were updated. unity of the Tatars. ethnicity and reconstruction ist. tradition in the form of the Tatars. ideologies (Sh. Mardzhani, I. Gasprinsky, X. Atlasov, etc.), the formation of modern. “ethnopolitical” nation of T. and the approval of a common self-name. 

In the 1990–2000s. the concept was further developed in the works of A.G. Mukhamadiev, I.R. Tagirov, D.M. Iskhakov, I.L. Izmailov, F.A. Rashitov, and others. Its supporters directly connect the ethnogenesis of T. with the Turkic-Tatars. (other Turko-Tatars, Bulgars, Khazars, Kipchaks, Kimaks, Oguzes, etc.) and Finno-Ugric ethnic. groups of the Volga-Ural and West Siberian regions. According to many of them, the basis is ethnocult. processes that led to the formation of modern Tatars nations, constituted social-political. and religious cult. factors that were refracted in the self-awareness of the people in the form of historical-genetic and cultural-linguistic unity (common mythological ancestors, religious ideas, historical destiny, etc.), which found concentrated expression in the ethnonym “T.”

Traditions of statehood and T. have a history of more than a thousand years. The first news about ethnopolit. associations of T. in the East. Turkestan and Mongolia date back to the 6th–8th centuries. In East In Europe, starting from the 7th century, Turko-Bulgars successively arose. states (Great Bulgaria, Khazar Kaganate, Volga Bulgaria). In 1208, as part of the Great Mongol State (Eke Mongol Ulus) of Genghis Khan, the Ulus of Jochi began to develop, which in 1227–43 included the Kipchak, Bulgar, Russian. and a number of other states and ethnopolitans. associations. Ulus Jochi mainly continued the Turkic Mong. state traditions devices, and from the 2nd floor. 13th century began to acquire features of the Islamic Turk. states with their own writing, mountains. culture, state structure and a single ethnopolit. system (Turkic-Mongolian tribal system, ruling aristocratic clans, military-service aristocracy, kurultai), ruling dynasty (Juchids), etc. After the collapse of the Golden Horde on its territory. new Turkic-Tatars arose. states that continued its traditions: Kazan, Tyumen (Siberian), Crimean, Astrakhan and Kasimov khanates, Great Horde, Nogai Horde, etc. In the period of the 16th–18th centuries. all Tatars. The khanates were conquered by the Russian state, but the old states. traditions served as one of the important incentives to preserve the unity of the people.

In the beginning. 20th century T. intensified the struggle for the restoration of its statehood, first in the form of a national cult. autonomy. In 1918 Millet Majlisi decided to create Ural-Volga State. An attempt to implement it on March 1, 1918 (see “ 3bulk republic") was stopped by the owls. pr. In 1918, the People's Commissariat for Nationalities of the RSFSR promulgated regulations on Tatar-Bashkir Soviet Socialist Republic(remained unrealized). In 1920, the Tatar ASSR was formed as part of the RSFSR. Declaration of the Supreme Council of the Republic on August 30. 1990 TASSR was transformed into the Republic of Tatarstan, after the March referendum of 1992 it was declared a sovereign state, a subject of international. rights related to the Russian Federation by the constitutions of both republics and contractual relations on the division of powers between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Tajikistan (1994, 2007).

Ethnopolitical history. Ancestors of modern T., like other Turkic people. peoples, are connected by their origin with the proto-Turk. population Center Asia (Altai, Transbaikalia, Mongolia), where they were part of various ethnopolitans. associations. At 6 - start. 13th centuries other Tatars ethnic groups were created at the Center. Asia a number of tribes. associations and state government Ethnopolitan. the Otuz-Tatar community formed in the steppes of Mongolia; in the 8th century as a result of military-political pressure from the Chinese and Turks, it broke up into several. breeding associations. Naib. Izv. and the strongest of them was the Tokuz-Tatars association. About the language and culture of the ancient Tatars. tribes (6th–8th centuries) there is not enough reliable information; Some linguists consider them Turkic. people (French orientalist P. Pelliot), others (M.Ts. Munkuev, J. Zhelet) - Mong. Plem. unification of the “Tokuz-Tatars” into the military-political. events Center Asia often became an ally of the Kyrgyz, acting on their side against the Turkic Khaganate (war 723–24). After the collapse of this Khaganate, the ancient Tatars. the tribes created their own ethnopolis. unification in the East. Turkestan, in alliance with the Oguzes, waged war against the Uyghur Kaganate. As a result of the defeat from the Uyghurs, some of them ended up as part of the Uyghur Kaganate, department. groups moved to South. Siberia, where, together with the Kimak-Kipchak tribes, they formed the Kimak Kaganate. As noted in the work “Zayn al-akhbar” (“Decoration of News,” 11th century), Gardizi, the ruler of this kaganate, according to the Kimak tradition, belonged to the T tribe. In 842, the Uyghur kaganate was defeated by the Kyrgyz, the lands of the ancient Tatars. tribes were included in their possessions (this is evidenced by the inscription in the valley of the Tes River). After the expulsion of the Kyrgyz in the 2nd half. 11th century other Tatars the tribes became part of the Uyghur principalities (Ganzhou, Turfan, etc.), and later created their own semi-independent principalities on the border of the East. Turkestan and whale. Gansu Province. In East In Turkestan, several states were formed between the states of the Karakhanids and the Tanguts (Xi Xia). principalities of the west other Tatars tribes They were active externally. politics in the Center. Asia (embassies to China in 958, 996, 1039, 1084, to Central Asia in 965, 981, etc.), fought for control of Vel. the Silk Road, concluded the military-political. alliances with the Ganzhou and Turfan principalities. The rulers of these Tatars. principalities bore the title “Apa-Tekin” (“Tegin”). In the 11th–12th centuries. other Tatars ethnopolitan breeding associations occupied means. terr. South and Vost. Mongolia, North China, East Turkestan. In the beginning. 13th century these associations were part of Mongol Empire(according to Chinese sources, this means that part of the other Tatar tribes was destroyed Genghis Khan, the remainder took part in his campaigns of conquest). This entire territory is inhabited by ancient Tatars. nationalities, Muslims. historiography of the countries of the East was called. “Dasht-i Tatar” (“Tatar steppe”), and the term “T.” the Center was assigned to part of the population of the steppes. Asia. In the dictionary “Diwanu lugat at-Turk” (“Collection of Turkic dialects”), compiled in 1072–74 Mahmoud Kashgari, language of ancient Tatars. tribes of the East Turkestan is recorded as Turkic. Presumably the main Some of them professed Buddhism, others - Manichaeism and Islam.

In the Volga-Ural region ethnic. T.'s substrate was made up of semi-nomadic Turks. and Ugric ( Hungarians, Madjars etc.) tribes, which in the 7th–9th centuries. actively interacted with the Turkic peoples. state center Asia, South Siberia and North. Caucasus ( Turkic Khaganate, Great Bulgaria, Khazar Khaganate, Kimak Khaganate and etc.). As a result of close interethnic relationships in ethnic T.'s substrate was penetrated by the socially developed Bulgars. tribes: Bulgars, barsils, baranjary, Savirs and others. In con. 9 - beginning 10th centuries in the process of forming the state, naib. The ethnopolitan turned out to be strong. the community of Bulgars who created in Wed. Volga region in 910–70s. Bulgarian and Suvar principalities (emirates). Presumably, in 980 a state was formed on the basis of these emirates and other lands Volga Bulgaria. As the Bulgarian state strengthened and its territory expanded. the Bulgars actively assimilated the department. Oguz-Pecheneg group x ( Oguz, Pechenegs) and Kipchak tribes (see. Kipchaks), as well as other neighboring ethnic groups. groups ( Burtasov, madjar, etc.). Of great importance in the consolidation of the Bulgars. ethnicity was played by the adoption of Islam as a state in 922. religion. This contributed to the formation of normative lit. language, ethnic historiography (“History of Bulgaria” Yaqub ibn Nugman etc.) and, ultimately, the formation of a single supra-ethnic culture and ethnopolit. self-awareness of the Bulgars, expansion of politics, economics. and cult. connections with external Muslim peace, especially with the countries of the East. In the 10th–13th centuries. In the steppes of Eurasia, other Tatars, Kipchak-Kimaks, and Bulgars formed. and other Turkic. state education. The consolidation of the Turks took place within them. tribes, the influence of Muslims increased. consciousness.

In the 1220s–40s. all states and tribes of the North. Eurasia was conquered by the Mongols. khans and became part of the Ulus of Jochi. The sedentary states (Russian principalities, the Bulgarian state, Khorezm, divided into emirates) became vassal possessions, and b. terr. Volga Bulgaria turned into part of the khan's domain, and the tribal unions of the Kimak-Kypchak were fragmented, their tribal nobility was partly exterminated, partly joined the Jochid aristocracy, the population of Desht-i Kipchak (the steppes of Eurasia) itself was included in the military adm. and the clan system of the Ulus of Jochi. It is characteristic that in mid. 13th century Domong began to disappear. tribal names and their replacement with Turkic-Mong began to occur. (kyyat, naiman, kungrat, kereit, katay, mangyt, burkut, jalair, uishun, etc.), repeated in various combinations near a number of territories. groups middle - century Thus, 4 ruling clans also appeared (Shirin, Baryn, Argyn, Kypchak). The influence of these Tatars. (Turkic-Mong.) clans turned out to be the most. strong in Nizh. Volga region, Urals and Western regions. Siberia, where they included in their structure and fundamentally. assimilated Ugric and Kipchak-Kimaks clans. It was from this time that among various groups of T. (including Astrakhan, Siberian, Crimean) and Nogais of the Vedas. The Tatars took the position. (Turko-Mong.) clans: Tabyn, Katai, Taz, Naiman, Kungrat/Kurdak, Kereit, Karagai, Elan, Tokuz, etc. Turkified Ugric groups, included in their composition, received the name. ishtek/ushtek/ost yak, and other names. Ugric origin - b. breeding ethnonyms of the Urals (istyak, bikatin, yurma, haina, uvat, supra, etc.) - preserved in the main. only in toponymy.

Simultaneous Within the framework of a single state, the formation of a special Turkic-Tatars took place. ethnic identity. An important element of the integration of the Golden Horde population was the spread of Islam in the Ulus of Jochi, which became from the beginning. 14th century, during the reign of Uzbek Khan (1312–41), state. religion, as well as the creation of normative lit. language (Volga Turks), development of writing and literature. The core of these cult.-ist. processes was the formation among the military service nobility of an imperial supra-ethnic culture, which included mythologies and symbols of the Jochid tradition, partly Muslim. worldview. All this led to a socio-cult. consolidation of the Golden Horde aristocracy and the emergence in the 14th century. the new ethnosocial community “T.”, which consisted of Ch. arr. from Muslims nobility who were part of the clan-tribe. ulus system of Ulus Jochi. This aristocracy received land and uluses in the Volga-Ural region, and the nobility of local peoples became its integral part. This is also evidenced by linguistic, toponymic and other materials, in particular, the appearance in the environment of the Volga-Ural T. names. tribal clans (sometimes in toponymy, genealogies of the nobility, etc.), such as Kungrat, Burkut, Ming, Tokuz, Toksoba, Kereit, Katai, Tabyn, Kipchak, Alat, Badrak. Sat down. and, partly, mountains. tax-paying population ( kara halyk) used for self-name. tahalluses, most often formed from toponyms (al-Bulgari, as-Sarai, Mun-Buljar, etc.).

After the collapse of the Golden Horde in mid. 15th century as part of the late Golden Horde political systems. formations began the formation of new ethnopolitans. communities that had their own local self-names, and the term “T.” becomes a general designation and self-name. for the class of their military-service nobility, united in a clan system and marked with the socionym “service Tatars”. The final design of these ethnoterra. groups occurred in the 15th–16th centuries. within the framework of the Turkic-Tatars that emerged from the Golden Horde. states (Great Horde, Nogai Horde, Siberian, Kazan, Crimean, Astrakhan and Kasimov khanates), sometimes beyond their borders (in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, in the Budzhak steppe of the Ottoman Empire). However, general state and ethnocult. traditions still remained one of the important reasons for preserving the idea of ​​​​the unity of the people. After joining in the 2nd half. 16th century The processes of migration and interaction between different ethnoterritories intensified from the Kazan, Astrakhan and Siberian khanates to the Russian state. groups T. In the Volga-Ural region and Siberia as a result of resettlement it means. groups service Tatars, who were in the main from mishars and a cauldron. T., there was a linguistic and cult. bringing together different ethnicities. groups of Tatars. population. Naib. This process acquired an intensive character in the Volga-Ural region, in which towards the end. 17th century a group of Volga-Ural Ts formed. The rapid formation of this group was facilitated by common historical, religious, linguistic and cultural-everyday traditions that arose during the periods of the Golden Horde and Tatars. khanates, as well as the objective need to oppose the policy of Christianization, Russification and other forms of national oppression. One of the features of ethnocult. development of various groups of T., the condition and consequence of their rapprochement was the awareness of belonging to a single faith, the establishment of a common confession “Muslims”.

The rapid development of the bourgeoisie. relations in Russia in the 2nd half. 19 - beginning 20th centuries led to the activation of T. in society and politics. and cult.-enlightenment. life growing up about-va. During this period, during the bourgeoisie. transformations gradually took place the formation of a new, national. kind of ethnic. self-awareness based on the ethnonym “T.”, and also the consolidation of various Europeans intensified. and Sib. subethnic and ethnographic groups T. Main. a condition for the formation of Tatars. bourgeois The nation became the ideology of reformation of the patriarchal foundations of the Tatars. about-va (see. Jadidism), which led to the emergence of common Tatars. period. press, new method system of the Tatars. confessional education, modern lit. language, secular literature, national book printing.

One of the evidence of the completion of the process of consolidation of the Tatars. nation to the beginning 20th century became the assimilation of all basic ethnoterr. groups of Turkic-Tatars of a single Tatar. self-awareness and approval of the ethnonym "T." According to the USSR census of 1926, 88% are Tatars. European population parts of the country recorded themselves as T. and only a small part of it used the department as an ethnonym. local names: Volga-Uralsk T. - Mishar, Kryashen (some of them are Nagaibak), Teptyar; Astrakhan - nugai, karagash; Sib. - bukharlyk, temenlik, baraba, tubylyk. This indicated the preservation of the department. forms of patriarchal and ethnoterr. traditions among part of T.

Simultaneous with this came the formation of a new Tatar. ideology. Basic its provisions were formulated by Sh. Marjani. A key element in the process of becoming Tatars. ethnicity, in his opinion, became the Golden Horde traditions preserved in the Tatars. khanates. Marjani's ideas were developed in the works of I. Gasprinsky, R. Fakhretdin, Kh. Atlasov, G. Ibragimov, G. Ishaki and others. This ideology became widespread among Muslims. Turko-Tatars. population of Russia. In places of compact residence of T., various Muslim communities were established everywhere. does charity. org-tions, ch. the goal of which was the development of a single ethnic cult. and ethnopolitan. self-awareness. Higher form of implementation of general Tatars. ideologies began to be created in 1906. party " Ittifaq al-Muslimin" and post. the presence of its leaders in the State. Duma of Russia of all convocations (S. Alkin, A. Akhtyamov, Ibn. Akhtyamov, S. Maksudov, etc.). The program of this party put forward ch. demands of the Tatars. population: provision of a wide national culture. autonomy, incl. in educational and religious. areas.

During Revolutions 1905–07 The idea of ​​“Tatar statehood” was developed, initially. in the form of national cult. autonomy, the prototypes of which were the local bureaus of Ittifaqa al-Muslimin. After the overthrow of the Tsar and the coming to power of the Provisional Government (1917), this was watered. The movement consistently sought to create a broad national cult. autonomy of T. In 1918 National. meeting of Muslims Int. Russia and Siberia (Millet Mejlisi) it was decided to form the Ural-Volga State. However, the Tatars' attempt. national-democratic the strength to implement it was stopped on March 1, 1918 by the Soviets. pr-vom (see " Backwater Republic"). In 1918, the People's Commissariat for Nationalities of the RSFSR, as an alternative to the Ural-Volga State, under pressure from the National Bolsheviks (M. Vakhitov, M. Sultan-Galiev, G. Ibragimova, etc.), proposed a project for the creation of the Tatar-Bashkir Soviet Republic (remained unrealized). In 1920, the Tatar Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic was formed as part of the RSFSR; this process was associated with widespread support for the Tatars. movement of the population and its willingness to water. methods to protect their national. interests. The composition of the author. The republic included just over half of the Tatars. population of Sov. Russia (1459.6 thousand out of 3.3 million people). As a result of the arbitrary establishment of the boundaries of the TASSR and the arts. dismemberment of the Tatars. people, it did not even include those counties with compact residence of T., territorial. which were directly adjacent to the newly formed republic: Belebeysky district. with a population of 671 thousand people. (62% Tatars and 4.5% Bashkirs) and Birsky district. - 626 thousand people. (55% Tatars and 4.4% Bashkirs). In the Tatar Republic only approx. 50% of the population were T.

With the creation of TASSR it means. part of T. received the opportunity to develop national. educational and cultural system in their native language. For the first time after the fall of the Kazan Khanate in 1552 the Tatars. the language, along with Russian, became the state language. The republic was created. Academic center for scientific organization research in Humanities. Rapid development of national culture and mass education of the population were promoted by politics indigenization state apparatus and a broad introduction to the business of the Tatars. language. Work was carried out in the republic to prepare a national personnel and their filling of positions in the state, party, prof., court. and other authorities, for the implementation of the program for the introduction of Tatars. language in state bodies and societies. management, institutions of cultural and mass work.

In the 1920s–30s. There was an active process of forming a new generation of Tatars. intelligentsia, new branches of the national economy were created. culture (fine art, opera, ballet, etc.), humanities, and a policy was also pursued to strengthen the position of the Tatars. language in the TASSR and in other regions of the country. In 1926–29 the transfer of the Tatars was carried out. alphabet in lat. graphics. According to the 1939 census, the literacy of the Tatars. of the population of the USSR turned out to be quite high: in the age group 50 years and older, the proportion of literate people was 48.3%, 20–49 years old - 78%, 9–19 years old - 96%. All R. 1930s out of 3339 secondary schools in the TASSR, 1738 (over 50%) were Tatar. By 1939, of all the schools in the republic, 48.7% were studying for Tatars. language. Among university students, the share of technical education reached 17.2% by 1939–40; among middle-technical students. uch. establishments - 49.5% (data for TASSR).

At the same time, after the formation of the USSR (1922), the national-state. The policy of the country's leadership began to shift towards limiting the ethnopolitical, national and original development of T. and began to have a targeted impact on the national and ideological spheres of self-awareness of peoples. Sov. functionaries, relying on traditional pre-rev. postulates of imperial policy and definitions. features of traditional national Tatar rituals and manipulating them, they began to create new forms of ethnoculture, different from the Tatars. ethnic mentality and social and family foundations (see. Cultural Revolution).

The “Great Terror” of 1937–38 became a new tragic period in the life of T.: on falsified cases of belonging to the bourgeois nationalist, Sultangali, Trotskyist, Bukharin and other organizations, on charges of sabotage, etc. Thousands of representatives were persecuted and arrested. political, scientific and the creative intelligentsia of T. Mass repressions led to the fact that the entire capable part of the Tatars. watered And intellectual elite was physically destroyed or ended up in prisons and concentration camps (as of January 1, 1942, there were 29.1 thousand prisoners in the Gulag system - T.). Simultaneous with the introduction of Russian alphabet (1939) in meaning. the degree of historical cult was violated. continuity in the cult. life of the people.

During the years of Vel. Fatherland war, during the period of deportation of Muslims. population of the North Caucasus and Crimea, ideological and political intensified. and ethnocult. pressure on T. Huge damage to the development of the Tatars. national culture and science caused the post. Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks “On the state and measures to improve mass political and ideological work in the Tatar party organization” (1944). One of the special events of this kind were the session of the Department of History and Philosophy of the USSR Academy of Sciences, organized jointly. with the Institute of Language, Literature and History of the KFAN USSR in Moscow (April 25–26, 1946), which actually canonized the tendentious study of the ethnogenesis of T. within the framework of the Bulgars alone. theories (see Scientific session of the USSR Academy of Sciences). A further step towards limiting the interests of T. was the division in 1952–53 of the TASSR into Bugulma, Kazan and Chistopol regions (after the death of I.V. Stalin in April 1953, they were liquidated).

During the years of the “Khrushchev Thaw” most. active representatives creative and scientific intelligentsia of Tatarstan began an ideological struggle for the national. rebirth. In 1954 they sent a letter to the Central Committee of the CPSU, in which the arts were indicated. restraining the development of national culture, reduction in the number of Tatars. schools, distortion of the history of the Tatars.-Rus. relations, belittling the role of the Tatars. people in the history of the Russian state, and also raised problems of nationality. toponymy, the question was raised about granting Tatarstan the status of a union republic. In the 2nd half. 1950s activity of national intelligentsia has noticeably strengthened and owls. The leadership was forced to take a number of measures to help defuse the situation in the Tatars. about-ve. As a result, in 1957 the spelling and terminology commission for improving the Tatars resumed their work. language, in 1958 Plenum of Tatars. Regional Committee of the CPSU accepted the post. “On the state and measures to improve the work of Tatar secondary schools”, the 1st congress of cultural workers took place in October 1958, May 24 - June 2, 1957 in Moscow Decade of Tatar art and literature etc.

In the 1950s–80s. There was a noticeable rise in the Tatar region. culture and people education, the number has increased significantly. Tatars scientific, technical and creative intelligentsia. In 1970 V. T. in the USSR among specialists with higher education. and middle-special education reached 1.5% (the figure was higher than the same figure for Azerbaijanis, Kazakhs and Lithuanians). In 1956–57, there were 25.3 thousand students at universities in the USSR, in 1974–75 - 99.8 thousand. By the 1965/66 academic year. d. their share among students



Rafael Khakimov

History of the Tatars: a view from the 21st century

(Article from Ivolumes of History of the Tatars from ancient times. About the history of the Tatars and the concept of a seven-volume work entitled “History of the Tatars from ancient times”)

The Tatars are one of those few peoples about whom legends and outright lies are known to a much greater extent than the truth.

The official history of the Tatars, both before and after the 1917 revolution, was extremely ideological and biased. Even the most outstanding Russian historians presented the “Tatar question” with bias or, at best, avoided it. Mikhail Khudyakov in his famous work “Essays on the History of the Kazan Khanate” wrote: “Russian historians were interested in the history of the Kazan Khanate only as material for studying the advance of the Russian tribe to the east. It should be noted that they mainly paid attention to the last moment of the struggle - the conquest of the region, especially the victorious siege of Kazan, but left almost without attention the gradual stages that the process of absorption of one state by another took place" [At the junction of continents and civilizations, p. 536 ]. The outstanding Russian historian S.M. Soloviev, in the preface to his multi-volume “History of Russia from Ancient Times,” noted: “The historian has no right from the middle of the 13th century to interrupt the natural thread of events - namely, the gradual transition of clan princely relations into state ones - and insert the Tatar period, highlight the Tatars, Tatar relations, as a result of which the main phenomena, the main reasons for these phenomena must be covered up” [Soloviev, p. 54]. Thus, a period of three centuries, the history of the Tatar states (Golden Horde, Kazan and other khanates), which influenced world processes, and not just the fate of the Russians, fell out of the chain of events in the formation of Russian statehood.

Another outstanding Russian historian V.O. Klyuchevsky divided the history of Russia into periods in accordance with the logic of colonization. “The history of Russia,” he wrote, “is the history of a country that is being colonized. The area of ​​colonization in it expanded along with its state territory.” “...The colonization of the country was the main fact of our history, with which all its other facts stood in close or distant connection” [Klyuchevsky, p. 50]. The main subjects of V.O. Klyuchevsky’s research were, as he himself wrote, the state and the nation, while the state was Russian, and the people were Russian. There was no place left for the Tatars and their statehood.

The Soviet period in relation to Tatar history was not distinguished by any fundamentally new approaches. Moreover, the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, with its resolution “On the state and measures to improve mass-political and ideological work in the Tatar party organization” of 1944, simply prohibited the study of the history of the Golden Horde (Ulus of Jochi), the Kazan Khanate, thus excluding the Tatar period from history of Russian statehood.

As a result of such approaches to the Tatars, an image of a terrible and savage tribe was formed that oppressed not only the Russians, but also almost half the world. There could be no talk of any positive Tatar history or Tatar civilization. Initially, it was believed that Tatars and civilization were incompatible things.

Today, each nation begins to write its own history independently. Scientific centers have become more independent ideologically, they are difficult to control and it is more difficult to put pressure on them.

The 21st century will inevitably make significant adjustments not only to the history of the peoples of Russia, but also to the history of the Russians themselves, as well as to the history of Russian statehood.

The positions of modern Russian historians are undergoing certain changes. For example, a three-volume history of Russia, published under the auspices of the Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences and recommended as teaching aid for university students, it provides a lot of information about non-Russian peoples who lived on the territory of present-day Russia. It contains characteristics of the Turkic, Khazar Khaganates, Volga Bulgaria, and more calmly describes the era of the Tatar-Mongol invasion and the period of the Kazan Khanate, but it is nevertheless Russian history, which cannot replace or absorb the Tatar one.

Until recently, Tatar historians in their research were limited by a number of rather strict objective and subjective conditions. Before the revolution, being citizens of the Russian Empire, they worked based on the tasks of ethnic revival. After the revolution, the period of freedom turned out to be too short to have time to write a full history. The ideological struggle greatly influenced their position, but, perhaps, the repressions of 1937 had a greater impact. Control by the CPSU Central Committee over the work of historians undermined the very possibility of developing scientific approach to history, subordinating everything to the tasks of the class struggle and the victory of the dictatorship of the proletariat.

The democratization of Soviet and Russian society made it possible to reconsider many pages of history, and most importantly, to rearrange all research work from ideological to scientific ones. It became possible to use the experience of foreign scientists, and access to new sources and museum reserves opened up.

Along with general democratization, a new political situation arose in Tatarstan, which declared sovereignty on behalf of the entire multi-ethnic people of the republic. At the same time, quite turbulent processes were taking place in the Tatar world. In 1992, the First World Congress of Tatars met, at which the problem of an objective study of the history of the Tatars was identified as a key political task. All this required a rethinking of the place of the republic and the Tatars in a renewing Russia. There was a need to take a fresh look at the methodological and theoretical foundations of the historical discipline associated with the study of the history of the Tatars.

“History of the Tatars” is a relatively independent discipline, since existing Russian history cannot replace or exhaust it.

Methodological problems in studying the history of the Tatars were posed by scientists who worked on generalizing works. Shigabutdin Marjani in his work “Mustafad al-akhbar fi ahvali Kazan va Bolgar” (“Information drawn for the history of Kazan and Bulgar”) wrote: “Historians of the Muslim world, wanting to fulfill the duty of providing complete information about different eras and explanations of the meaning of human society, collected a lot of information about capitals, caliphs, kings, scientists, Sufis, different social strata, ways and directions of thought of ancient sages, past nature and Everyday life, science and crafts, wars and uprisings." And further he noted that “historical science absorbs the destinies of all nations and tribes, tests scientific directions and discussions” [Marjani, p.42]. At the same time, he did not highlight the methodology for studying Tatar history itself, although in the context of his works it is visible quite clearly. He examined the ethnic roots of the Tatars, their statehood, the rule of the khans, the economy, culture, religion, as well as the position of the Tatar people within the Russian Empire.

In Soviet times, ideological clichés required the use of Marxist methodology. Gaziz Gubaidullin wrote the following: “If we consider the path traversed by the Tatars, we can see that it is made up of the replacement of some economic formations by others, from the interaction of classes born of economic conditions” [Gubaidullin, p.20]. This was a tribute to the requirements of the time. His presentation of history itself was much broader than his stated position.

All subsequent historians Soviet period were under severe ideological pressure and the methodology was reduced to the works of the classics of Marxism-Leninism. Nevertheless, in many works of Gaziz Gubaidullin, Mikhail Khudyakov and others, a different, non-official approach to history broke through. The monograph of Magomet Safargaleev “The Collapse of the Golden Horde”, the works of German Fedorov-Davydov, despite the inevitable censorship restrictions, by the very fact of their appearance had a strong influence on subsequent research. The works of Mirkasim Usmanov, Alfred Khalikov, Yahya Abdullin, Azgar Mukhamadiev, Damir Iskhakov and many others introduced an element of alternative into the existing interpretation of history, forcing us to delve deeper into ethnic history.

Of the foreign historians who studied the Tatars, the most famous are Zaki Validi Togan and Akdes Nigmat Kurat. Zaki Validi specifically dealt with the methodological problems of history, but he was more interested in the methods, goals and objectives of historical science in general, as opposed to other sciences, as well as approaches to writing common Turkic history. At the same time, in his books one can see specific methods for studying Tatar history. First of all, it should be noted that he described Turkic-Tatar history without isolating Tatar history from it. Moreover, this concerned not only the ancient common Turkic period, but also subsequent eras. He equally considers the personality of Genghis Khan, his children, Tamerlane, the various khanates - Crimean, Kazan, Nogai and Astrakhan, calling all this Turkic world. Of course, there are reasons for this approach. The ethnonym “Tatars” was often understood very broadly and included almost not only the Turks, but even the Mongols. At the same time, the history of many Turkic peoples in the Middle Ages, primarily within the framework of the Ulus of Jochi, was united. Therefore, the term “Turkic-Tatar history” in relation to the Turkic population of Dzhuchiev Ulus allows the historian to avoid many difficulties in presenting events.

Other foreign historians (Edward Keenan, Aisha Rohrlich, Yaroslav Pelensky, Yulai Shamiloglu, Nadir Devlet, Tamurbek Davletshin and others), although they did not set out to find common approaches to the history of the Tatars, nevertheless introduced very significant conceptual ideas into the study of various periods . They compensated for the gaps in the works of Tatar historians of the Soviet era.

The ethnic component is one of the most important in the study of history. Before the advent of statehood, the history of the Tatars largely boils down to ethnogenesis. Equally, the loss of statehood brings the study of ethnic processes to the fore. The existence of the state, although it relegates the ethnic factor to the background, nevertheless preserves its relative independence as a subject of historical research; moreover, sometimes it is the ethnic group that acts as a state-forming factor and, therefore, is decisively reflected in the course of history.

The Tatar people do not have a single ethnic root. Among his ancestors were the Huns, Bulgars, Kipchaks, Nogais and other peoples, who themselves were formed in ancient times, as can be seen from the first volume of this publication, on the basis of the culture of various Scythian and other tribes and peoples.

The formation of modern Tatars was influenced to a certain extent by the Finno-Ugrians and Slavs. Trying to look for ethnic purity in the person of the Bulgars or some ancient Tatar people is unscientific. The ancestors of modern Tatars never lived in isolation; on the contrary, they actively moved, mixing with various Turkic and non-Turkic tribes. On the other hand, government agencies, while developing official language and culture, contributed to the active mixing of tribes and peoples. This is all the more true since the state has always played the function of the most important ethnic-forming factor. But the Bulgarian state, the Golden Horde, the Kazan, Astrakhan and other khanates existed for many centuries - a period sufficient to form new ethnic components. Religion was an equally strong factor in the mixing of ethnic groups. If Orthodoxy in Russia turned many baptized peoples into Russians, then in the Middle Ages Islam in the same way turned many into Turkic-Tatars.

The dispute with the so-called “Bulgarists”, who call to rename the Tatars into Bulgars and reduce our entire history to the history of one ethnic group, is mainly of a political nature, and therefore it should be studied within the framework of political science, and not history. At the same time, the emergence of this direction of social thought was influenced by the poor development methodological foundations history of the Tatars, the influence of ideological approaches to the presentation of history, including the desire to exclude the “Tatar period” from history.

In recent decades, there has been a passion among scientists for searching for linguistic, ethnographic and other features in the Tatar people. The slightest features languages ​​were immediately declared a dialect, and on the basis of linguistic and ethnographic nuances, separate groups were identified that today claim to be independent peoples. Of course, there are peculiarities in the use of the Tatar language among the Mishars, Astrakhan and Siberian Tatars. There are ethnographic features of Tatars living in different territories. But this is precisely the use of a single Tatar literary language with regional characteristics, nuances of a single Tatar culture. It would be reckless to talk about language dialects on such grounds, much less to single out independent peoples (Siberian and other Tatars). If you follow the logic of some of our scientists, Lithuanian Tatars who speak Polish cannot be classified as Tatar people at all.

The history of a people cannot be reduced to the vicissitudes of an ethnonym. It is not easy to trace the connection of the ethnonym “Tatars” mentioned in Chinese, Arabic and other sources with modern Tatars. It is even more incorrect to see a direct anthropological and cultural connection between modern Tatars and ancient and medieval tribes. Some experts believe that the true Tatars were Mongol-speaking (see, for example: [Kychanov, 1995, p. 29]), although there are other points of view. There was a time when the ethnonym “Tatars” designated the Tatar-Mongol peoples. “Because of their extreme greatness and honorable position,” wrote Rashid ad-din, “other Turkic clans, with all the differences in their ranks and names, became known by their name, and all were called Tatars. And those various clans believed their greatness and dignity in the fact that they included themselves among them and became known under their name, similar to the way they are now, due to the prosperity of Genghis Khan and his clan, since they are Mongols - different Turkic tribes, like Jalairs, Tatars, On-Guts, Kereits, Naimans, Tanguts and others, each of whom had a specific name and a special nickname - all of them, out of self-praise, also call themselves Mongols, despite the fact that in ancient times they did not recognize this name . Their present descendants, therefore, imagine that since ancient times they have been related to the name of the Mongols and are called by this name - but this is not so, for in ancient times the Mongols were only one tribe from the entire totality of the Turkic steppe tribes" [Rashid ad-din, t. i, book 1, p. 102–103].

At different periods of history, the name “Tatars” meant different peoples. Often this depended on the nationality of the authors of the chronicles. Thus, monk Julian, ambassador of the Hungarian king Bela IV to the Polovtsians in the 13th century. associated the ethnonym “Tatars” with the Greek “Tartaros” - “hell”, “underworld”. Some European historians used the ethnonym “Tatar” in the same sense as the Greeks used the word “barbarian”. For example, on some European maps Muscovy is designated as "Moscow Tartary" or "European Tartary", in contrast to Chinese or Independent Tartaria. The history of the existence of the ethnonym “Tatar” in subsequent eras, in particular in the 16th–19th centuries, was far from simple. [Karimullin]. Damir Iskhakov writes: “In the Tatar khanates formed after the collapse of the Golden Horde, representatives of the military-service class were traditionally called “Tatars”... They played a key role in the spread of the ethnonym “Tatars” over the vast territory of the former Golden Horde. After the fall of the khanates, this term was transferred to the common people. But at the same time, many local self-names and the confessional name “Muslims” functioned among the people. Overcoming them and the final consolidation of the ethnonym “Tatars” as a national self-name is a relatively late phenomenon and is associated with national consolidation” [Iskhakov, p.231]. These arguments contain a considerable amount of truth, although it would be a mistake to absolutize any facet of the term “Tatars”. Obviously, the ethnonym “Tatars” has been and remains the subject of scientific debate. It is indisputable that before the revolution of 1917, Tatars were called not only the Volga, Crimean and Lithuanian Tatars, but also Azerbaijanis, as well as a number of Turkic peoples of the North Caucasus and Southern Siberia, but in the end the ethnonym “Tatars” was assigned only to the Volga and Crimean Tatars.

The term “Tatar-Mongols” is very controversial and painful for the Tatars. Ideologists have done a lot to present the Tatars and Mongols as barbarians and savages. In response, a number of scientists use the term “Turkic-Mongols” or simply “Mongols,” sparing the pride of the Volga Tatars. But in fact, history does not need justification. No nation can boast of its peaceful and humane character in the past, because those who did not know how to fight could not survive and were themselves conquered, and often assimilated. The European crusades or the Inquisition were no less cruel than the invasion of the “Tatar-Mongols”. The whole difference is that Europeans and Russians took the initiative in interpreting this issue into their own hands and offered a version and assessment of historical events that was favorable to themselves.

The term “Tatar-Mongols” needs careful analysis in order to find out the validity of the combination of the names “Tatars” and “Mongols”. The Mongols relied on Turkic tribes in their expansion. Turkic culture greatly influenced the formation of the empire of Genghis Khan and especially the Ulus of Jochi. The way historiography has developed is that both the Mongols and the Turks were often called simply “Tatars.” This was both true and false. True, since there were relatively few Mongols themselves, and Turkic culture (language, writing, military system, etc.) gradually became the general norm for many peoples. This is incorrect due to the fact that the Tatars and Mongols are two different peoples. Moreover, modern Tatars cannot be identified not only with the Mongols, but even with the medieval Central Asian Tatars. At the same time, they are the successors of the culture of the peoples of the 7th–12th centuries who lived on the Volga and in the Urals, the people and state of the Golden Horde, the Kazan Khanate, and it would be a mistake to say that they have nothing to do with the Tatars who lived in East Turkestan and Mongolia. Even the Mongol element, which is minimal in Tatar culture today, influenced the formation of the history of the Tatars. In the end, the khans buried in the Kazan Kremlin were Genghisids and this cannot be ignored [Mausoleums of the Kazan Kremlin]. History is never simple and straightforward.

When presenting the history of the Tatars, it turns out to be very difficult to separate it from the general Turkic basis. First of all, we should note some terminological difficulties in the study of common Turkic history. If the Turkic Khaganate is quite unambiguously interpreted as a common Turkic heritage, then the Mongol Empire and especially the Golden Horde are more complex formations from an ethnic point of view. In fact, Ulus Jochi is generally considered to be a Tatar state, meaning by this ethnonym all those peoples who lived in it, i.e. Turko-Tatars. But will today's Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Uzbeks and others who were formed in the Golden Horde agree to recognize the Tatars as their medieval ancestors? Of course not. After all, it is obvious that no one will particularly think about the differences in the use of this ethnonym in the Middle Ages and now. Today, in the public consciousness, the ethnonym “Tatars” is clearly associated with modern Volga or Crimean Tatars. Consequently, it is methodologically preferable, following Zaki Validi, to use the term “Turkic-Tatar history,” which allows us to separate the history of today’s Tatars and other Turkic peoples.

The use of this term carries another burden. There is a problem of correlating the common Turkic history with the national one. In some periods (for example, the Turkic Kaganate) it is difficult to isolate individual parts from the general history. In the era of the Golden Horde it is quite possible to explore, along with general history, separate regions that later became independent khanates. Of course, the Tatars interacted with the Uighurs, and with Turkey, and with the Mamluks of Egypt, but these connections were not as organic as with Central Asia. Therefore, it is difficult to find a unified approach to the relationship between common Turkic and Tatar history - it is in different eras and with different countries it turns out to be different. Therefore, in this work we will use the term Turkic-Tatar history(in relation to the Middle Ages), it’s as simple as that Tatar history(applied to later times).

“History of the Tatars” as a relatively independent discipline exists insofar as there is an object of study that can be traced from ancient times to the present day. What ensures the continuity of this story, what can confirm the continuity of events? After all, over many centuries, some ethnic groups were replaced by others, states appeared and disappeared, peoples united and divided, new languages ​​were formed to replace the ones that were leaving.

The object of the historian’s research in the most generalized form is the society that inherits the previous culture and passes it on to the next generation. In this case, society can act in the form of a state or an ethnic group. And during the years of persecution of the Tatars from the second half of the 16th century, separate ethnic groups, little connected with each other, became the main custodians of cultural traditions. The religious community always plays a significant role in historical development, serving as a criterion for classifying a society as a particular civilization. Mosques and madrassas, from the 10th century until the 20s XX centuries, were the most important institution for the unification of the Tatar world. All of them - the state, ethnic group and religious community - contributed to the continuity of Tatar culture, and therefore ensured the continuity historical development.

The concept of culture has the broadest meaning, which is understood as all the achievements and norms of society, be it economy (for example, agriculture), the art of government, military affairs, writing, literature, social norms etc. The study of culture as a whole makes it possible to understand the logic of historical development and determine the place of a given society in the broadest context. It is the continuity of the preservation and development of culture that allows us to speak about the continuity of Tatar history and its characteristics.

Any periodization of history is conditional, therefore, in principle, it can be built on a variety of foundations, and its various options can be equally correct - it all depends on the task that is assigned to the researcher. When studying the history of statehood there will be one basis for distinguishing periods, when studying the development of ethnic groups - another. And if you study the history of, for example, a home or a costume, then their periodization may even have specific grounds. Each specific object of research, along with general methodological guidelines, has its own development logic. Even the convenience of presentation (for example, in a textbook) can become the basis for a specific periodization.

When highlighting the main milestones in the history of the people in our publication, the criterion will be the logic of cultural development. Culture is the most important social regulator. Through the term “culture” we can explain both the fall and rise of states, the disappearance and emergence of civilizations. Culture determines social values, creates advantages for the existence of certain peoples, forms incentives for work and individual personality traits, determines the openness of society and opportunities for communication among peoples. Through culture one can understand the place of society in world history.

Tatar history with its complex twists of fate is not easy to imagine as a complete picture, as ups were followed by catastrophic regression, right down to the need for physical survival and preservation of the elementary foundations of culture and even language.

The initial basis for the formation of the Tatar or, more precisely, the Turkic-Tatar civilization is the steppe culture, which determined the appearance of Eurasia from ancient times until the early Middle Ages. Cattle breeding and horses determined the basic nature of the economy and way of life, housing and clothing, and ensured military success. The invention of the saddle, curved saber, powerful bow, war tactics, a unique ideology in the form of Tengrism and other achievements had a huge impact on world culture. Without steppe civilization, the development of the vast expanses of Eurasia would have been impossible; this is precisely its historical merit.

The adoption of Islam in 922 and the development of the Great Volga Route became turning points in the history of the Tatars. Thanks to Islam, the ancestors of the Tatars were included in the most advanced Muslim world of their time, which determined the future of the people and its civilizational characteristics. And the Islamic world itself, thanks to the Bulgars, advanced to the northernmost latitude, which is an important factor to this day.

The ancestors of the Tatars, who moved from nomadic to settled life and urban civilization, were looking for new ways of communication with other peoples. The steppe remained to the south, and the horse could not perform universal functions in the new conditions of settled life. He was only an auxiliary tool in the household. What connected the Bulgarian state with other countries and peoples were the Volga and Kama rivers. In later times, the route along the Volga, Kama and Caspian Sea was supplemented by access to the Black Sea through the Crimea, which became one of the most important factors in the economic prosperity of the Golden Horde. The Volga route also played a key role in the Kazan Khanate. It is no coincidence that Muscovy's expansion to the east began with the establishment of the Nizhny Novgorod Fair, which weakened the economy of Kazan. The development of the Eurasian space in the Middle Ages cannot be understood and explained without the role of the Volga-Kama basin as a means of communication. The Volga still functions as the economic and cultural core of the European part of Russia.

The emergence of the Ulus of Jochi as part of the Mongol super-empire, and then an independent state, is the greatest achievement in the history of the Tatars. During the era of the Chingizids, Tatar history became truly global, affecting the interests of the East and Europe. The contribution of the Tatars to the art of war is undeniable, which was reflected in the improvement of weapons and military tactics. The system of public administration has reached perfection, the postal (Yamskaya) service inherited by Russia is excellent financial system, literature and urban planning of the Golden Horde - in the Middle Ages there were few cities equal to Saray in size and scale of trade. Thanks to intensive trade with Europe, the Golden Horde came into direct contact with European culture. The enormous potential for the reproduction of Tatar culture was laid precisely in the era of the Golden Horde. The Kazan Khanate continued this path mostly by inertia.

The cultural core of Tatar history after the capture of Kazan in 1552 was preserved primarily thanks to Islam. It became a form of cultural survival, a banner of the struggle against Christianization and assimilation of the Tatars.

In the history of the Tatars there were three turning points associated with Islam. They decisively influenced subsequent events: 1) the adoption of Islam as the official religion by the Volga Bulgaria in 922, which meant recognition by Baghdad of a young independent (from the Khazar Kaganate) state; 2) isthe Lama “revolution” of Uzbek Khan, who, contrary to the “Yasa” (“Code of Laws”) of Genghis Khan on the equality of religions, introduced one state religion - Islam, which largely predetermined the process of consolidation of society and the formation of the (Golden Horde) Turkic-Tatar people; 3) reform of Islam in the second half of the 19th century, called Jadidism (from the Arabic al-jadid - new, renewal).

The revival of the Tatar people in modern times begins precisely with the reform of Islam. Jadidism has designated several important facts: firstly, the ability of Tatar culture to resist forced Christianization; secondly, confirmation of the Tatars’ belonging to the Islamic world, moreover, with a claim to a vanguard role in it; thirdly, the entry of Islam into competition with Orthodoxy in its own state. Jadidism has become a significant contribution of the Tatars to modern world culture, a demonstration of Islam's ability to modernize.

By the beginning of the 20th century, the Tatars managed to create many social structures: an education system, periodicals, political parties, their own (“Muslim”) faction in the State Duma, economic structures, primarily trading capital, etc. By the revolution of 1917, the Tatars had matured ideas for restoring statehood.

The first attempt to recreate statehood by the Tatars dates back to 1918, when the Idel-Ural State was proclaimed. The Bolsheviks managed to forestall the implementation of this grandiose project. Nevertheless, the direct consequence of the political act itself was the adoption of the Decree on the creation of the Tatar-Bashkir Republic. The complex vicissitudes of the political and ideological struggle culminated in the adoption in 1920 of the Decree of the Central Executive Committee on the creation of the “Tatar Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic”. This form was very far from the formula of the Idel-Ural State, but it was undoubtedly a positive step, without which there would not have been the Declaration of State Sovereignty of the Republic of Tatarstan in 1990.

The new status of Tatarstan after the declaration of state sovereignty put on the agenda the issue of choosing a fundamental path of development, determining the place of Tatarstan in the Russian Federation, in the Turkic and Islamic world.

Historians of Russia and Tatarstan are facing a serious test. The 20th century was the era of the collapse of first the Russian and then the Soviet empire and a change in the political picture of the world. The Russian Federation has become a different country and it is forced to take a fresh look at the path traveled. It faces the need to find ideological reference points for development in the new millennium. In many ways, it will be up to historians to understand the deep processes taking place in the country and the formation of an image of Russia among non-Russian peoples as “our own” or “foreign” state.

Russian science will have to reckon with the emergence of many independent research centers that have their own views on emerging problems. Therefore, it will be difficult to write the history of Russia only from Moscow; it should be written by various research teams, taking into account the history of all the indigenous peoples of the country.

* * *

The seven-volume work entitled “History of the Tatars from Ancient Times” is published under the stamp of the Institute of History of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan, however, it is a joint work of scientists of Tatarstan, Russian and foreign researchers. This collective work is based on a whole series of scientific conferences held in Kazan, Moscow, and St. Petersburg. The work is of an academic nature and is therefore intended primarily for scientists and specialists. We did not set ourselves the goal of making it popular and easy to understand. Our task was to present the most objective picture of historical events. Nevertheless, both teachers and those who are simply interested in history will find many interesting stories here.

This work is the first academic work that begins to describe the history of the Tatars from 3 thousand BC. The most ancient period cannot always be represented in the form of events, sometimes it exists only in archaeological materials, nevertheless we considered it necessary to give such a presentation. Much of what the reader will see in this work is subject to debate and requires further research. This is not an encyclopedia, which provides only established information. It was important for us to document the existing level of knowledge in this field of science and to offer new methodological approaches, when the history of the Tatars is presented in the broad context of world processes, covering the destinies of many peoples, and not just the Tatars, to focus attention on a number of problematic issues and thereby stimulate scientific thought.

Each volume covers a fundamentally new period in the history of the Tatars. The editors considered it necessary, in addition to the author's texts, to provide illustrative material, maps, and also excerpts from the most important sources as an appendix.


This did not affect the Russian principalities, where the dominance of Orthodoxy was not only preserved, but also developed further. In 1313, Uzbek Khan issued a label to the Metropolitan of Rus' Peter, which contained the following words: “If anyone blasphemes Christianity, speaks badly about churches, monasteries and chapels, that person will be subject to the death penalty” (quoted from: [Fakhretdin, p.94]). By the way, Uzbek Khan himself married his daughter to the Moscow prince and allowed her to convert to Christianity.

Tatars are the titular people of the Republic of Tatarstan, which is included in the Russian Federation. This is a Turkic ethnic group with many subethnic groups. Due to the widespread settlement in the regions of Russia and neighboring countries, they influenced their ethnogenesis, assimilating with the local population. Within the ethnic group there are several anthropological types of Tatars. Tatar culture is filled with national traditions that are unusual for Russians.

Where live

Approximately half (53% of the total) Tatars live in the Republic of Tatarstan. Others are settled throughout the rest of Russia. Representatives of the people live in the regions of Central Asia, the Far East, the Volga region, and Siberia. According to territorial and ethnic characteristics, the people are divided into 3 large groups:

  1. Siberian
  2. Astrakhan
  3. Living in the Middle Volga region, the Urals.

IN last group includes: Kazan Tatars, Mishars, Teptyars, Kryashens. Other subenos include:

  1. Kasimov Tatars
  2. Perm Tatars
  3. Polish-Lithuanian Tatars
  4. Chepetsk Tatars
  5. Nagaibaki

Number

There are 8,000,000 Tatars in the world. Of these, about 5.5 million live in Russia and the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. This is the second largest population after citizens of Russian nationality. At the same time, there are 2,000,000 people in Tatarstan, 1,000,000 in Bashkortostan. A small number moved to regions neighboring Russia:

  • Uzbekistan - 320,000;
  • Kazakhstan - 200,000;
  • Ukraine - 73,000;
  • Kyrgyzstan - 45,000.

A small number live in Romania, Turkey, Canada, USA, Poland.

Kazan - the capital of Tatarstan

Language

State language Tatarstan is Tatar. It belongs to the Volga-Kypchak subgroup of the Turkic branch of the Altai languages. Representatives of subethnic groups speak their own dialects. The closest are the speech features of the peoples of the Volga region and Siberia. Currently, Tatar writing is based on the Cyrillic alphabet. Before this, the Latin alphabet was used, and in the Middle Ages the basis of writing was Arabic characters.

Religion

The vast majority of Tatars are Muslims professing Sunni Islam. There are also Orthodox Christians. A small part considers themselves atheists.

Name

The self-name of the nation is Tatarlar. There is no clear version of the origin of the term “Tatars”. There are several versions of the etymology of this word. The main ones:

  1. Root tat, meaning "to experience", plus the suffix ar- “gaining experience, advisor.”
  2. Derivative of tattoos- “peaceful, ally.”
  3. In some dialects tat means "foreigner".
  4. The Mongolian word Tatars means "poor speaker".

According to two latest versions, these words were used to call the Tatars by other tribes who did not understand their language, for whom they were strangers.

Story

The first evidence of the existence of Tatar tribes was found in Turkic chronicles. Chinese sources also mention the Tatars as people who lived along the banks of the Amur. They date back to the 8th-10th centuries. Historians believe that the ancestors of modern Tatars were formed with the participation of Khazar, Polovian nomads, tribes inhabiting Volga Bulgaria. They united into one community with their own culture, writing, and language. In the 13th century, the Golden Horde was created - a powerful state that was divided into classes, aristocracy, and clergy. By the 15th century it had broken up into separate khanates, which gave rise to the formation of sub-ethnic groups. At a later time, mass migration of Tatars began across the territory of the Russian state.
As a result of genetic studies, it turned out that different Tatar subethnic groups did not have common ancestors. There is also a large diversity of genome within subgroups, from which we can conclude that many peoples influenced their creation. Some ethnic groups have a large percentage of the genome of Caucasian nationalities, while Asian ones are almost absent.

Appearance

Tatars of different ethnic groups have different appearance. This is due to the large genetic diversity of types. In total, 4 types of representatives of the people were identified based on anthropological characteristics. This:

  1. Pontic
  2. Sublaponoid
  3. Mongoloid
  4. Light European

Depending on the anthropological type, people of Tatar nationality have light or dark skin, hair and eyes. Representatives of the Siberian ethnic group are most similar to Asians. They have a wide, flat face, a narrow eye shape, a wide nose, and an upper eyelid with a fold. Dark skin, coarse, black hair, dark color irises. They are short and squat.


Volga Tatars have an oval face and fair skin. They are distinguished by the presence of a hump on the nose, apparently inherited from the Caucasian peoples. The eyes are large, gray or brown. Tall men with good physique. There are blue-eyed and fair-haired representatives of this group. Kazan Tatars have medium-dark skin, brown eyes, and dark hair. They have regular facial features, a straight nose, and clearly defined cheekbones.

Life

The main occupations of the Tatar tribes were:

  • arable farming;
  • pasture-stall livestock farming;
  • horticulture.

Hemp, barley, lentils, wheat, oats, and rye were grown in the fields. Agriculture was of a three-field type. Cattle breeding was expressed in the breeding of sheep, goats, bulls, and horses. This occupation made it possible to obtain meat, milk, wool, and skins for sewing clothes. Horses and oxen were used as draft animals and for transportation. Root crops and melons were also grown. Beekeeping was developed. Hunting was carried out by individual tribes, mainly living in the Urals. Fishing was common among the ethnic groups inhabiting the banks of the Volga and Ural. Among the crafts, the following activities have become widespread:

  • jewelry production;
  • furriery;
  • felting craft;
  • weaving;
  • leather production.

The national Tatar ornament is characterized by the presence of floral and plant designs. This shows the people’s closeness to nature, the ability to see beauty in the world around them. The women knew how to weave and made their own everyday and festive costumes. Details of clothing were decorated with patterns in the form of flowers and plants. In the 19th century, embroidery with gold threads became popular. Shoes and wardrobe items were made from leather. Products made of leather of different shades, sewn together, were popular.


Until the 20th century, tribes had tribal relations. There was a division between the male half of the population and the female half. The girls were isolated from young men; they did not communicate until the wedding. A man had a higher status than a woman. Remnants of such relations persist in Tatar villages to this day.

All Tatar families are deeply patriarchal. Everything the father says is fulfilled unquestioningly. Children revere their mother, but the wife has virtually no say. Boys are brought up in permissiveness, since they are the successors of the family. From childhood, girls are taught decency, modesty, and submission to men. Young girls know how to run a household and help their mother around the house.
Marriages were concluded by agreement between parents. The young people’s consent was not asked. The groom's relatives were obliged to pay the bride price - ransom. Most wedding ceremonies and feasts took place without the presence of the bride and groom; numerous relatives took part in them. The girl got to her husband only after paying the dowry. If the groom arranged for the bride to be kidnapped, the family was freed from the ransom.

Housing

Tatar tribes located their settlements along the banks of rivers, near major roads. The villages were built chaotically, without an orderly layout. The villages were characterized by winding streets, sometimes leading to dead ends. A solid fence was erected on the street side, outbuildings were built in the courtyard, placing them in a group or in the shape of the letter P. The administration, mosque, and trading shops were located in the center of the settlement.

Tatar houses were log buildings. Sometimes the dwelling was made of stone, less often it was made of adobe. The roof was covered with straw, shingles, and boards. The house had two or three rooms, including a vestibule. Rich families could afford two- and three-story dwellings. Inside, the house was divided into female and male halves. They made stoves in the houses, similar to the Russian ones. They were located next to the entrance. The inside of the home was decorated with embroidered towels and tablecloths. The outside walls were painted with ornaments and trimmed with carvings.


Cloth

Tatar folk costume was formed under the influence of Asian culture. Some elements were borrowed from the Caucasian peoples. The outfits of different ethnic groups vary slightly. The basis of a men's suit consists of such elements as:

  1. Long shirt (kulmek).
  2. Harem trousers.
  3. Long sleeveless vest.
  4. Wide belt.
  5. Skullcap.
  6. Ichigi.

The tunic was decorated at the top and bottom with national ornaments; it was belted with a wide, long piece of fabric with fringe at the ends. In addition to the shirt, loose pants were worn. Over the set they wore a sleeveless vest, the fronts of which were equipped with embroidery. Sometimes they wore a long robe (almost to the floor) made of cotton material. The head was covered with a skullcap, which was generously decorated with national ornaments. Some ethnic groups wore fezzes - Turkish headdresses. In cold weather, they wore a beshmet - a narrow-cut caftan down to the knees. In winter they wore sheepskin coats and fur hats. Ichigi served as shoes. These are light, comfortable boots made of soft leather without heels. Ichigi were decorated with colored leather inserts and ornaments.


The outfits of Tatar girls are very colorful and feminine. Initially, girls wore a costume similar to men's: a long (floor-length) tunic and wide pants. Ruffles were sewn to the bottom edge of the tunic. The upper part was embroidered with patterns. In modern outfits, the tunic has been transformed into a long dress with a narrow bodice and a flared hem. The dress emphasizes the female figure well, giving it a curvaceous shape. A vest of medium length or waist-length is worn over it. It is richly decorated with embroidery. The head is covered with a cap like a fez, a turban or a kalfak.

Traditions

The Tatars are a nation with a dynamic temperament. They are very active and love dancing and music. Tatar culture has many holidays and customs. They celebrate almost all Muslim holidays, and they also have ancient rituals associated with natural phenomena. The main holidays are:

  1. Sabantui.
  2. Nardugan.
  3. Nowruz.
  4. Eid al-Fitr.
  5. Eid al Adha.
  6. Ramadan.

Ramadan is a holy holiday of spiritual purification. It is called by the name of the month of the Tatar calendar, the ninth in a row. There is strict fasting throughout the month; in addition, you need to pray fervently. This helps a person to cleanse himself of dirty thoughts and become closer to God. This strengthens faith in Allah. Eid al-Adha is celebrated to mark the end of fasting. On this day you can eat everything that Muslims cannot afford during fasting. The holiday is celebrated by the whole family, with the invitation of relatives. In rural areas, celebrations are held with dancing, singing, and fairs.

Kurban Bayram is a holiday of sacrifice, celebrated 70 days after Eid al-Adha. This is the main holiday among Muslims around the world and the most beloved. On this day, sacrifices are made to please Allah. Legend has it that the Almighty asked Prophet Ibrahim to sacrifice his son as a test. Ibrahim decided to fulfill the desire of Allah, showing the steadfastness of his faith. Therefore, God left his son alive, ordering him to slaughter a lamb instead. On this day, Muslims must sacrifice a sheep, ram or goat, keep some of the meat for themselves, and distribute the rest to those in need.

Sabantuy, the festival of the plow, is very significant for the Tatars. This is the day the spring field work ends. It is dedicated to work, harvest, healthy image life. Sabantuy is celebrated cheerfully and on a grand scale. On this day, festivities, dancing, sport competitions. Competitions of singers and dancers are held. It is customary to invite guests and serve refreshments. Porridge, colored eggs, and buns are placed on the table.


Nardugan is an ancient pagan holiday of the winter solstice. It is celebrated at the end of December. Translated from Mongolian, the name of the holiday means “birth of the sun.” There is a belief that with the beginning of the solstice, the forces of darkness lose their power. Young people dress up in costumes, masks and walk around the courtyards. On the day of the vernal equinox (March 21), Novruz is celebrated - the arrival of spring. According to the astronomical solar calendar, a new year is coming. Daylight overtakes night, the sun turns to summer.
Another interesting custom is that Tatars do not eat pork. This is explained by the laws of Islam. The point is that Allah knows what benefits his creatures, that is, people. He forbids eating pork because it is considered unclean. This lock is reflected in the Koran, the holy book for Muslims.

Names

Tatars call children beautiful, sonorous names, which have deep meaning. Popular male names are:

  • Karim - generous;
  • Kamil - perfect;
  • Anwar - radiant;
  • Arslan - lion;
  • Dinar is precious.

Girls are called names that reveal natural qualities, symbolizing beauty and wisdom. Common female names:

  • Venus is a star;
  • Gulnara - decorated with flowers;
  • Kamalia - perfect;
  • Lucia - light;
  • Ramilya - miraculous;
  • Firyuza is radiant.

Food

The peoples of Asia, Siberia, and the Urals had a great influence on Tatar cuisine. The inclusion of their national dishes (pilaf, dumplings, baklava, chak-chak) diversified the Tatar diet and made it more diverse. The Tatar cuisine is rich in meat, vegetables, and seasonings. It contains a lot of various baked goods, confectionery, nuts, and dried fruits. In the Middle Ages, horse meat was widely consumed; later they began to add meat from chickens, turkeys, and geese. Beloved meat dish Tatars have lamb. Lots of fermented milk products: cottage cheese, ayran, sour cream. Dumplings and dumplings 1 are a fairly common food on the Tatar table. Dumplings are eaten with broth. Popular dishes of Tatar cuisine:

  1. Shurpa is a fatty, thick soup based on lamb.
  2. Belish is a baked pie made from unleavened dough, stuffed with meat and potatoes, rice or millet. This is the most ancient dish, it is served on festive table.
  3. Tutyrma is a homemade intestine sausage stuffed with minced meat and rice.
  4. Beshbarmak - stew with homemade noodles. It is traditionally eaten with the hands, hence the name “five fingers”.
  5. Baklava is a treat that came from the East. It is a cookie made from puff pastry with nuts in syrup.
  6. Chak-chak is a sweet product made from dough with honey.
  7. Gubadiya is a closed pie with a sweet filling, which is distributed in layers. It includes rice, dried fruits, cottage cheese.

Potatoes are often used as a side dish. There are snacks made from beets, carrots, tomatoes, and sweet peppers. Turnips, pumpkin, and cabbage are used as food. Porridge is a common dish. For everyday food, millet, buckwheat, peas, and rice are cooked. The Tatar table always contains a variety of sweets made from unleavened and rich dough. These include: baursak, helpek, katlama, kosh-tele. Honey is often added to sweet dishes.


Popular drinks:

  • ayran - a fermented milk product based on kefir;
  • kvass made from rye flour;
  • sherbet - a soft drink made from rose hips, licorice, roses with the addition of honey and spices;
  • herbal teas.

Tatar cuisine is characterized by stewing, boiling, and baking in the oven. The food is not fried; sometimes boiled meat is fried a little in the oven.

Famous people

Among the Tatar people there are many talented people, famous throughout the world. These are athletes, scientists and cultural figures, writers, actors. Here are some of them:

  1. Chulpan Khamatova is an actress.
  2. Marat Basharov is an actor.
  3. Rudolf Nureyev - ballet dancer.
  4. Musa Jalil is a famous poet, Hero of the Soviet Union.
  5. Zakir Rameev is a classic of Tatar literature.
  6. Alsou is a singer.
  7. Azat Abbasov - Opera singer.
  8. Gata Kamsky is a grandmaster, US chess champion in 1991, and is one of the 20 strongest chess players in the world.
  9. Zinetula Bilyaletdinov is an Olympic champion, multiple world and European champion as part of the hockey team, coach of the Russian national hockey team.
  10. Albina Akhatova is a five-time world champion in biathlon.

Character

The Tatar nation is very hospitable and friendly. A guest is an important person in the house; they are treated with great respect and asked to share a meal with them. Representatives of this people have a cheerful, optimistic character and do not like to lose heart. They are very sociable and talkative.

Men are characterized by perseverance and determination. They are distinguished by hard work and are accustomed to achieving success. Tatar women are very friendly and responsive. They are raised as models of morality and decency. They are attached to their children and try to give them the best.

Modern Tatar women follow fashion, look very well-groomed and attractive. They are educated, there is always something to talk about with them. Representatives of this people leave a pleasant impression of themselves.

A peculiarity of the Tatar nationality is the absence of pronounced appearance features, which would make it possible to unmistakably distinguish its representatives from other peoples. Their appearance varies depending on the ethnic group to which they belong. However, anthropology still identifies signs of what Tatars look like, taking into account their characteristic features.

How to identify a Tatar: typical features of nationality

Tatars (self-name “Tatarlar”) belong to the Turkic group, the white race. Since ancient times, the populous ethnic group has influenced the development of Eurasia. The history of the Middle Ages tells how a nation held in suspense a vast territory from Pacific Ocean to the Atlantic coast.

The variety of appearance types of the people is due to their origin, since among the ancestors of the Tatars there were representatives of both the Mongoloid and European races. This also explains the prevalence and population of the nation.

The mixed race, which the Tatars belong to, allows us to see among its representatives dark-haired and fair-haired, red-haired, brown-eyed, gray-eyed, and so on.

Depending on where they came from and where they live, many types of a given nationality are distinguished.

These include:

  • Kazan;
  • Kasimovsky;
  • Siberian;
  • Astrakhan;
  • Permian;
  • Crimean Tatars;
  • mishari;
  • Teptyari;
  • Kryashens;
  • Nagaibaks and others.

The size of the nation in Russia in 2010, according to Wikipedia, is 5.3 million people. In percentage terms, the number of Tatars out of the total population is 3.87%. In terms of prevalence in the Russian Federation, the nationality is recognized as the second after Russian. There are about a million Tatars in the world, they make up more than half of the population of the Republic of Tatarstan (53%), and in the USA, according to statistics, only 2-7 thousand people live.

Representatives of the nation speak the Tatar language, which includes Western and Kazan dialects. In the religion of the people there are Muslims, Orthodox Christians (Kryashens) or atheists (no faith in God). Predominantly in their religion, Tatars belong to Sunnis, not Shiites.

The characteristics of anthropological types help determine nationality by facial features.

Among the Tatars there are 4 of them:


Each of them is characterized by the features shown in the photo.

Head shape

Tatars are characterized by mesocephaly or subbrachycephaly (cranial index 76-80), that is, they are predominantly medium-headed, moderately long and wide skull and oval face.

The Mongoloid type is characterized by brachycephaly, that is, short-headedness. At the same time, the face is wide and flattened.

The photo shows TV presenter Almaz Garayev and actor and TV presenter Timur Batrutdinov.

Almaz Garayev

Timur Batrutdinov

Eyes

It is believed that Tatars are characterized by a Mongolian eye shape and narrow shape. However, this is not necessary; the epicanthus is found predominantly in the Mongoloid type and is poorly developed in the sublaponoid type.

Other anthropological types do not have such characteristics.

The color varies: Tatars are blue-eyed and have brown eyes. But the most common are green ones.

The photo shows singer, actor and director Dmitry Bikbaev.

It is difficult to identify a Tatar by his appearance.

A more typical type is presented below - singer, actor, composer, producer, film director Renat Ibragimov.

Nose

The shape of the olfactory organ among Tatars is varied. Usually the nose is wide, with a straight back or a slight hump. The Pontic type is characterized by a drooping tip, while the Mongoloid and sublaponoid types are characterized by a low nose bridge.

The photo shows singer, actor, entrepreneur, composer, producer Timati (Timur Yunusov) and successful tennis player Marat Safin.

Marat Safin

Hair

Tatars are predominantly characterized by black hair color. But unlike the Uzbeks, Mongols, and Tajiks, there are also fair-haired representatives of the nationality. Tatars may have light brown or red color.

The photographs show Russian football player Ruslan Nigmatullin and actor Marat Basharov.

Ruslan Nigmatullin

Marat Basharov

Appearance of the Tatars

The generalized image of what Tatars are like is a person of average height with mixed pigmentation of eyes and hair, a moderately wide oval face, a straight or hump nose. Men are distinguished by their strongly built bodies and stockiness; women, on the contrary, are frail.

The appearance of Tatars sometimes differs significantly, depending on their belonging to a particular ethnic group.

Kazansky

Among the Tatars of this ethnic group, European appearance features are often observed: light brown hair, sometimes red, light eyes, a narrow nose, straight or with a hump. This type is similar to the Slavs.

Mongols may have a wide oval face and narrowed eyes.

Men are characterized by average height, strong build, and short neck. This is due to mixing of blood with Finnish peoples.

The picture shows Kazan Tatar celebrities.

Crimean

The Tatars of this group appeared in the 15th century. Its representatives live in the south of Ukraine, Russia, Romania, Turkey, and Uzbekistan (where they were deported from Crimea in the mid-20th century).

Pure-blooded Crimean Tatars have an appearance close to Slavic. The real representatives of the nation were tall, had light brown or red hair, light eyes and skin.

However, the proximity to Asians introduced characteristic features into the image of the nationality. Many Tatars acquired the appropriate type of face, dark hair and eyes, and dark complexion.

After returning to Crimea, the people are reviving lost original customs and traditions.

The photo shows the Crimean and Kazan Tatars, where the features can be traced, how the ethnic groups differ from each other.

Ural

The history of the Tatars in the Southern Urals has been little studied; today the Chelyabinsk region has a huge number of communities.

The anthropological type of a representative of a nationality is presented in the figure.

Often there are dark hair and eyes, possibly narrowed, a wide oval face and nose, prominent cheekbones, and large ears.

Volga region

The Tatars of this group are characterized by signs of the Mongoloid race. This is manifested by dark hair, gray or brown eyes with a crease in the upper eyelid, a wide nose, sometimes with a hump, and usually fair skin.

Men are distinguished by a strong physique and above average height.

Siberian

It is characterized by an oriental appearance, which is visually easy to distinguish from Russian. Characterized by a mixture of Caucasoid and Mongoloid types. Sometimes the appearance of Siberian Tatars is comparable to that of Uzbekistan.

Representatives of the nationality have dark hair and eyes, prominent cheekbones, and a wide oriental nose. The physique is correct, men are characterized by strength and endurance.

Gorkovsky (Nizhny Novgorod)

They act as a subethnic group of Tatar-Mishars. Their characteristic feature is the clicking Nizhny Novgorod dialect. They live in Nizhny Novgorod, Dzerzhinsk and Tatar villages.

The Pontic anthropological type of appearance predominates, manifested by dark or mixed pigmentation of the eyes and hair, a nose with a hump and a drooping tip, and average height. Caucasian features are possible, differing from the previous ones in light hair and eye color. The Mongoloid type of appearance is not numerous.

Astrakhan

A group of Tatars formed on the territory of the modern Astrakhan region. They are considered descendants of the Turkic-speaking population of the Golden Horde and have their own dialect.

In the course of historical development, the people experienced the influence of the Nogais.

The appearance of the Astrakhan Tatars is more characterized by Mongoloid features than Caucasoid ones. There is a dark color of hair and eyes, some narrowness, a wide oval face and nose.

What do Tatar women look like?

The appearance features of the fairer sex of Tatar nationality are similar to those of men. Most of them are of European ethnicity, however, the Mongoloid type is also common.

The photo shows various types of Tatar appearance: the famous journalist and TV presenter Liliya Gildeeva and the beautiful Miss “Youth of Tatarstan 2012” Albina Zamaleeva.

Liliya Gildeeva

Albina Zamaleeva

Face

Tatar girls are characterized by a rounded oval face, unexpressed squinting of the eyes, and possibly the presence of epicanthus. Their color varies from blue to black. Green eyes are more common.

The photo shows the singer AsylYar (Alsu Zainutdinova).

Her biography notes that she is the very first in history to perform a song in the Tatar language at the International Eurovision Song Contest.

Hair color is also varied; among Tatar women there are blondes, brunettes, brown-haired, and redheads.

The photo shows the Olympic champion of Europe and Russia in rhythmic gymnastics, State Duma deputy Alina Kabaeva and model Diana Farkhullina.

Alina Kabaeva

Diana Farhullina

Depending on the type of appearance, the skin is dark or light. It is often whiter than that of representatives of Slavic nationality.

Figure

Most Tatar women are characterized by slender figures, fragility and grace. An example of this is theater and film actress Chulpan Khamatova.

The height of Tatar women is average, about 165 centimeters, long legs uncharacteristic. Some representatives of the nation are characterized by a square figure: broad shoulders along with the same hips. A narrow waist emphasizes the beauty of Tatar women.

The photograph shows the famous fashion model Irina Shayk (Shaykhlislamova), a Tatar on her father’s side.

Features of character and mentality

To understand who the Tatars are, it is important to know who they came from. Their origin left an imprint on their appearance and lifestyle.

Briefly, the theory of where the Tatars came from calls the ancient state of Volga Bulgaria the place where the roots of the nation were formed. Their ancestors are the Bulgars. The Turkic-Bulgar ethnos came from the Asian steppes and settled in the Middle Volga region. In the X-XIII centuries, the nationality created its own statehood. Mostly we're talking about about the Volga-Ural group, other varieties are considered as separate communities. For example, the theory of Tatar-Mongol origin reduces or even denies the participation of Volga Bulgaria in the history of the Kazan Tatars.

There is often a dispute about whether Tatars are Asians or Europeans. It is due to racial mixing. Geneticists claim that the nation is mostly Caucasian, with a minority of Mongoloids.

The photo shows Tatar boys and girls in national costumes.

The mentality and culture of the people are influenced by their religion - they profess Islam, which they adopted on May 21, 922.

The character of a Tatar man is characterized by stubbornness and indifference. However, at the same time, he is hardworking, hospitable, and has a sense of self-esteem, which is sometimes perceived as pride and arrogance. Crimean Tatars are distinguished by their calmness and enterprise in stressful situations. They are careerists, striving for knowledge and new opportunities.

What kind of Tatar men are in relationships is determined by their character: they are reliable, reasonable, law-abiding, purposeful. Religion allows polygamy, but it is extremely rare. Usually a second wife, a younger one, is brought into the house to help with everyday life when the first one gets old.

A Tatar wife is obedient and submissive to her husband, devoted in love; from childhood, girls are prepared for a long-lasting and only marriage. Women are inquisitive, clean, hospitable, attentive to people, love to cook and raise children. Among the dishes that the Tatars eat are kazylyk (dried horse meat), gubadia (layer cake), talkysh kaleve (dessert), and chak-chak. The basis of culinary masterpieces is dough and a thick layer of fat.

Tatar women follow fashion, are interested in new products and love beautiful clothes: despite being submissive to their husbands and being faithful to customs and traditions, you won’t find her in a black burqa.

The photo shows singer Alsou (Safina/Abramova).

It is believed that Tatar women are passionate in bed, and men are skilled lovers.

Religion does not prohibit marriages with people of other faiths, so a Tatar wife and a Russian husband meet, and vice versa. Such families are quite happy, each member adheres to his own religious beliefs. From a mixture of Russians and Tatars, mestizos are born. Children of mixed blood are often outwardly attractive, combining the features of 2 nationalities.

An interesting fact is the appearance in some infants of a sign of belonging to the Mongoloid race - a specific spot (Mongolian). This Tatar mark in a child is a bluish patch of skin on the buttocks, sacrum, and thighs.

Sometimes it is mistaken for a bruise, although this is considered a sign of oriental blood. With age, the spot disappears.

Tatarov emphasizes worship and respect for elders.

The marriage ceremony is interesting. After the wedding, the guy and the girl do not live together for another year. It is considered correct that at this time the young woman remains with her parents, and the husband (in Tatar the word sounds “ir”) comes as a guest.

Differences from other nations

By comparing the appearances of the Tatars and similar peoples, identical and distinctive features are identified.

For example, the Bashkirs also belong to the Turkic family, have a similar language and adhere to the same religion. However, there are differences in appearance. Tatars are predominantly characterized by Caucasian features, while Bashkirs are characterized by Mongoloid features.

Bashkirka

There is a theory that Jews are similar to Tatars. This is due to the similar structure of DNA. Proponents of the hypothesis believe that the majority of Ashkenazi Jews did not belong to Israel and are Turks.

There is a commonality between the Tatars and the Turks. This is their belonging to the Turkic peoples.

The Tatars also have a close connection with the Kazakhs. Previously, they were classified as one people, connected by the Turkic community. However, it is not difficult to distinguish nationality by appearance.

For visual comparison, the picture shows the anthropological types of different peoples.

Stereotypes

There are many stereotypes about the Tatar people, right and wrong, which have outlived their usefulness or are still their distinctive features to this day.

  • An uninvited guest is worse than a Tatar!- phraseological unit refers to the time when the Russians were under the yoke. The Tatars were cruel invaders, they showed violence and ferocity. The Russians accordingly considered them a nasty people and hated them with all their hearts. Therefore, the uninvited guest in the proverb appears as an unexpected invader, like the Tatarva, as they were disparagingly called in Rus'.
  • The Tatars are cunning and stingy. People are characterized by frugality; they do not like to waste money. The Tatar is thrifty and prosperous, creates comfortable living conditions for himself, managing his finances wisely.
  • Self-love and arrogance. Sometimes Tatars call themselves special, arguing that their roots are inherent in great people. This is the reason why representatives of the nation are not liked. However, it is also common for other nationalities to extol their people and consider them better than others.
  • Tea lovers. Not a single event or meeting takes place without a drink.
  • Hospitality. Tatars are friendly and inquisitive. They are happy to receive guests in the house. The hosts will put exquisite Tatar delicacies on the table and maintain a pleasant conversation
Did you like the article? Share with your friends!