The first years of the 17th century are considered to be the birth of the Dutch school. This school belongs to the great schools of painting and is an independent and independent school with unique and inimitable characteristics and identity.

This has a largely historical explanation - a new movement in art and a new state on the map of Europe arose simultaneously.

Until the 17th century, Holland did not stand out for its abundance of national artists. Perhaps that is why in the future in this country one can count such a large number of artists, and specifically Dutch artists. While this country was one state with Flanders, it was mainly in Flanders that original artistic movements were intensively created and developed. Outstanding painters Van Eyck, Memling, Rogier van der Weyden, the likes of whom were not found in Holland, worked in Flanders. Only isolated bursts of genius in painting can be noted at the beginning of the 16th century; this is the artist and engraver Luke of Leiden, who is a follower of the Bruges school. But Luke of Leiden did not create any school. The same can be said about the painter Dirk Bouts from Haarlem, whose creations hardly stand out against the background of the style and manner of the origins of the Flemish school, about the artists Mostaert, Skorel and Heemskerke, who, despite all their significance, are not individual talents that characterize them with their originality country.

Then Italian influence spread to everyone who created with the brush - from Antwerp to Haarlem. This was one of the reasons that borders were blurred, schools were mixed, and artists lost their national identity. Not even a single student of Jan Skorel survived. The last, the most famous, the greatest portrait painter, who, together with Rembrandt, is the pride of Holland, an artist gifted with powerful talent, excellently educated, varied in style, courageous and flexible by nature, a cosmopolitan who has lost all traces of his origin and even his name - Antonis Moreau , (he was the official painter of the Spanish king) died after 1588.

The surviving painters almost ceased to be Dutch in the spirit of their work; they lacked the organization and ability to renew the national school. These were representatives of Dutch mannerism: the engraver Hendrik Goltzius, Cornelis of Haarlem, who imitated Michelangelo, Abraham Bloemaert, a follower of Correggio, Michiel Mierevelt, a good portrait artist, skillful, precise, laconic, a little cold, modern for his time, but not national. It is interesting that he alone did not succumb to Italian influence, which subjugated most of the manifestations in the painting of Holland at that time.

By the end of the 16th century, when portrait painters had already created a school, other artists began to appear and form. In the second half of the 16th century, a large number of painters were born who became a phenomenon in painting; this was almost the awakening of the Dutch national school. The wide variety of talents leads to many different directions and paths for the development of painting. Artists test themselves in all genres, in different color schemes: some work in a light manner, others in a dark manner (here the influence of the Italian artist Caravaggio). Painters are committed to light colors, and colorists to dark colors. The search for a pictorial manner begins, and rules for depicting chiaroscuro are developed. The palette becomes more relaxed and free, as do the lines and plasticity of the image. Rembrandt's direct predecessors appear - his teachers Jan Pace and Peter Lastman. Genre methods are also becoming more free - historicity is not as obligatory as before. A special, deeply national and almost historical genre is being created - group portraits intended for public places - city halls, corporations, workshops and communities. With this event, the most perfect in form, the 16th century ends and the 17th century begins.

This is just the beginning, the embryo of the school; the school itself does not exist yet. There are many talented artists. Among them there are skilled craftsmen, several great painters. Morelse, Jan Ravestein, Lastman, Frans Hals, Pulenburg, van Schoten, van de Venne, Thomas de Keyser, Honthorst, Cape the Elder, and finally Esayas van de Velde and van Goyen - all of them were born at the end of the 16th century. This list also includes artists whose names have been preserved by history, those who represented only individual attempts to achieve mastery, and those who became teachers and predecessors of future masters.

In development Dutch painting it was a critical moment. With an unstable political balance, everything depended only on chance. In Flanders, where a similar awakening was observed, on the contrary, there was already a sense of confidence and stability that was not yet there in Holland. In Flanders there were already artists who had formed or were close to this. Political and socio-historical conditions in this country were more favorable. There was a more flexible and tolerant government, traditions and society. The need for luxury gave rise to a persistent need for art. In general, there were serious reasons for Flanders to become a great center of art for the second time. For this, only two things were missing: several years of peace and a master who would be the creator of the school.

In 1609, when the fate of Holland was being decided - Philip III agreed on a truce between Spain and the Netherlands - Rubens appeared.

Everything depended on political or military chance. Defeated and subjugated, Holland would have to completely lose its independence. Then, of course, there could not be two independent schools - in Holland and in Flanders. In a country dependent on Italian-Flemish influence, such a school and talented original artists could not develop.

In order for the Dutch people to be born, and for Dutch art to see the light with them, a revolution, deep and victorious, was needed. It was especially important that the revolution be based on justice, reason, necessity, that the people deserve what they wanted to achieve, that they be decisive, convinced that they are right, hardworking, patient, restrained, heroic, and wise. All these historical features were subsequently reflected during the formation of the Dutch school of painting.

The situation turned out to be such that the war did not ruin the Dutch, but enriched them; the struggle for independence did not deplete their strength, but strengthened and inspired them. In the victory over the invaders, the people showed the same courage as in the fight against the elements, over the sea, over the flooding of lands, over the climate. What was supposed to destroy the people served them well. Treaties signed with Spain gave Holland freedom and strengthened its position. All this led to the creation of their own art, which glorified, spiritualized and expressed the inner essence of the Dutch people.

After the treaty of 1609 and the official recognition of the United Provinces, there was an immediate lull. It was as if a beneficial, warm breeze touched human souls, revived the soil, found and awakened sprouts that were ready to bloom. It is amazing how unexpectedly and in what a short period of time - no more than thirty years - in a small space, on ungrateful desert soil, in harsh living conditions, a wonderful galaxy of painters, and great painters at that, appeared.

They appeared immediately and everywhere: in Amsterdam, Dordrecht, Leiden, Delft, Utrecht, Rotterdam, Haarlem, even abroad - as if from seeds that fell outside the field. The earliest are Jan van Goyen and Wijnants, born at the turn of the century. And further, in the interval from the beginning of the century to the end of its first third - Cuyp, Terborch, Brouwer, Rembrandt, Adrian van Ostade, Ferdinand Bol, Gerard Dau, Metsu, Venix, Wauerman, Berchem, Potter, Jan Steen, Jacob Ruisdael.

But the creative juices didn’t stop there. Next were born Pieter de Hooch, Hobbema. The last of the greats, van der Heyden and Adrian van de Velde, were born in 1636 and 1637. At this time, Rembrandt was thirty years old. Approximately these years can be considered the time of the first flowering of the Dutch school.

Considering the historical events of that time, one can imagine what the aspirations, character and fate of the new school of painting should be. What could these artists write in a country like Holland?

The revolution, which gave the Dutch people freedom and wealth, at the same time deprived them of what constitutes the vital basis of great schools everywhere. She changed beliefs, changed habits, abolished images of both ancient and evangelical scenes, stopped the creation large works- church and decorative paintings. In fact, every artist had an alternative - to be original or not to be at all.

It was necessary to create art for a nation of burghers that would appeal to them, depict them, and be relevant to them. They were practical, not prone to daydreaming, business people, with broken traditions and anti-Italian sentiments. We can say that the Dutch people had a simple and bold task - to create their own portrait.

Dutch painting was and could only be an expression of the external appearance, a true, accurate, similar portrait of Holland. It was a portrait of people and terrain, burgher customs, squares, streets, fields, sea and sky. The main elements of the Dutch school were portraits, landscapes, and everyday scenes. Such was this painting from the beginning of its existence until its decline.

It may seem that nothing could be simpler than the discovery of this ordinary art. In fact, it is impossible to imagine anything equal to it in breadth and novelty.

Immediately everything changed in the manner of understanding, seeing and conveying: point of view, artistic ideal, choice of nature, style and method. Italian and Flemish painting in its best manifestations is still understandable to us, because they are still enjoyed, but this already dead languages, and no one will use them anymore.

At one time there was a habit of thinking loftily and generally; there was an art that consisted in the skillful selection of objects. In their decoration, correction. It loved to show nature as it does not exist in reality. Everything depicted was more or less consistent with the person’s personality, depended on it and was its likeness. As a result, an art arose in which man is at the center, and all other images of the universe were either embodied in human forms, or were vaguely displayed as a secondary environment of man. Creativity developed according to certain patterns. Each object had to borrow its plastic form from the same ideal. The man had to be depicted more often naked than clothed, well-built and handsome, so that he could play the role assigned to him with appropriate grandeur.

Now the task of painting has become simpler. It was necessary to give each thing or phenomenon its true meaning, to put a person in its proper place, and, if necessary, to do without him altogether.

It's time to think less, look closely at what's closest, observe better and write differently. Now this is the painting of the crowd, the citizen, the working man. It was necessary to become modest for everything modest, small for the small, inconspicuous for the inconspicuous, to accept everything without rejecting or despising anything, to penetrate into the hidden life of things, lovingly merging with their existence, it was necessary to become attentive, inquisitive and patient. Genius now consists of not having any prejudices. There is no need to embellish, or ennoble, or expose anything: all this is a lie and useless work.

Dutch painters, creating in some corner of the northern country with water, forests, sea horizons, were able to reflect the entire universe in miniature. A small country, carefully explored according to the tastes and instincts of the observer, turns into an inexhaustible treasury, as abundant as life itself, as rich in sensations as the human heart is rich in them. The Dutch school has been growing and working like this for a whole century.

Dutch painters found subjects and colors to satisfy any human inclinations and affections, for rough and delicate natures, ardent and melancholic, dreamy and cheerful. Cloudy days give way to cheerful sunny days, the sea is sometimes calm and sparkling with silver, sometimes stormy and gloomy. There are many pastures with farms and many ships crowded along the coast. And you can almost always feel the movement of air over the open spaces and strong winds from the North Sea, which pile up the clouds, bend the trees, turn the wings of the mills and drive away light and shadows. To this must be added cities, home and street life, festivities at fairs, depictions of various morals, the need of the poor, the horrors of winter, idleness in taverns with their tobacco smoke and mugs of beer. On the other hand - a wealthy lifestyle, conscientious work, cavalcades, afternoon rest, hunting. Besides - public life, civil ceremonies, banquets. The result was new art, but with subjects as old as time.

Thus arose a harmonious unity of the spirit of the school and the most astonishing diversity ever to arise within a single movement of art.

In general, the Dutch school is called genre school. If we decompose it into its component elements, then we can distinguish in it landscape painters, masters of group portraits, marine painters, animal painters, artists who painted group portraits or still lifes. If you look in more detail, you can distinguish many genre varieties - from lovers of picturesqueness to ideologists, from copyists of nature to its interpreters, from conservative homebodies to travelers, from those who love and feel humor to artists who avoid comedy. Let us remember the paintings of Ostade's humor and the seriousness of Ruisdael, the equanimity of Potter and the mockery of Jan Steen, the wit of Van de Velde and the gloomy dreaminess of the great Rembrandt.

With the exception of Rembrandt, who must be considered an exceptional phenomenon, both for his country and for all times, then all other Dutch artists are characterized by a certain style and method. The laws for this style are sincerity, accessibility, naturalness, and expressiveness. If you take away from Dutch art what can be called honesty, then you will cease to understand its vital basis and will not be able to determine either its moral character or its style. In these artists, who for the most part have earned the reputation of short-sighted copyists, you feel the sublime and kind soul, loyalty to truth, love of realism. All this gives their works a value that the things depicted on them themselves do not seem to have.

The beginning of this sincere style and the first result of this honest approach is a perfect drawing. Among Dutch painters, Potter is a manifestation of genius in precise, verified measurements and the ability to trace the movement of each line.

In Holland, the sky often takes up half, and sometimes the entire picture. Therefore, it is necessary for the sky in the picture to move, attract, and carry us along with it. So that the difference between day, evening and night can be felt, so that heat and cold can be felt, so that the viewer is both chilly and enjoys it, and feels the need to concentrate. Although it is probably difficult to call such a drawing the noblest of all, try to find artists in the world who would paint the sky, like Ruisdael and van der Neer, and would say so much and so brilliantly with their work. Everywhere the Dutch have the same design - restrained, laconic, precise, natural and naive, skillful and not artificial.

The Dutch palette is quite worthy of their drawing, hence the perfect unity of their painting method. Any Dutch painting can be easily recognized by appearance. It is small in size and distinguished by its powerful, strict colors. This requires great precision, a steady hand, and deep concentration from the artist in order to achieve a concentrated effect on the viewer. The artist must go deep into himself in order to nurture his idea, the viewer must go deep into himself in order to comprehend the artist’s plan. It is Dutch paintings that give the clearest idea of ​​this hidden and eternal process: to feel, think and express. There is no more rich picture in the world, since it is the Dutch who include so much content in such a small space. That is why everything here takes on a precise, compressed and condensed form.

Any Dutch painting is concave, it consists of curves described around a single point, which is the embodiment of the concept of the picture and shadows located around the main spot of light. A solid base, a running top and rounded corners tending towards the center - all this is outlined, colored and illuminated in a circle. As a result, the painting acquires depth, and the objects depicted on it move away from the viewer’s eye. The viewer is, as it were, led from the foreground to the last, from the frame to the horizon. We seem to inhabit the picture, move, look deep, raise our heads to measure the depth of the sky. Strictness aerial perspective, perfect correspondence of color and shades with the place in space that the object occupies.

For a more complete understanding of Dutch painting, one should consider in detail the elements of this movement, the features of the methods, the nature of the palette, and understand why it is so poor, almost monochromatic and so rich in results. But all these questions, like many others, have always been the subject of speculation by many art historians, but have never been sufficiently studied and clarified. The description of the main features of Dutch art allows us to distinguish this school from others and trace its origins. An expressive image illustrating this school is a painting by Adriaan van Ostade from the Amsterdam Museum "Artist's Atelier". This subject was one of the favorites of Dutch painters. We see attentive person, slightly hunched over, with a prepared palette, thin, clean brushes and transparent oil. He writes in the twilight. His face is concentrated, his hand is careful. Only, perhaps, these painters were more daring and knew how to laugh more carefree and enjoy life than can be concluded from the surviving images. Otherwise, how would their genius manifest itself in an atmosphere of professional traditions?

The foundation for the Dutch school was laid by van Goyen and Wijnants at the beginning of the 17th century, establishing some laws of painting. These laws were passed down from teachers to students, and for a whole century Dutch painters lived by them without deviating to the side.

Dutch mannerism painting

The Golden Age of Dutch painting is one of the most outstanding eras in the history of all world painting. The Golden Age of Dutch painting is considered 17th century. It was at this time that they created their immortal works the most talented artists and painters. Their paintings are still considered unsurpassed masterpieces, which are kept in famous museums around the world and are considered an invaluable heritage of humanity.

At first 17th century In Holland, a rather primitive art still flourished, which was justified by the mundane tastes and preferences of rich and powerful people. As a result of political, geopolitical and religious changes, Dutch art changed dramatically. If before this artists tried to pander to the Dutch burghers, depicting their life and way of life, devoid of any lofty and poetic language, and also worked for the church, which commissioned artists to work in a rather primitive genre with long-worn subjects, then the beginning of the 17th century was a real breakthrough. In Holland, the dominance of Protestants reigned, who practically stopped ordering paintings on religious themes from artists. Holland became independent from Spain and asserted itself on the historical podium. Artists moved from previously familiar themes to depicting everyday scenes, portraits, landscapes, still lifes, and so on. Here, in a new field, the artists of the golden age seemed to have a new breath and real geniuses of art began to appear in the world.

Dutch artists of the 17th century introduced realism in painting into fashion. Stunning in composition, in realism, in depth and unusualness, the paintings began to enjoy enormous success. The demand for paintings increased sharply. As a result, more and more new artists began to appear, who at an amazingly fast pace developed the fundamentals of painting, developed new techniques, styles and genres. Some of the most famous artists of the Golden Age were: Jan Vermeer, Cornelis Trost, Matthias Stom, Pieter Bruegel the Elder, Esaias van de Velde, Frans Hals, Adrian Brouwer, Cornelis de Man, Anthony van Dyck and many others.

Paintings by Dutch painters

Cornelis de Man - Whale Oil Manufactory

Cornelis Trost - Fun in the Park

Ludolf Backhuizen - East India Campaign Dock in Amsterdam

Pieter Bruegel the Elder - The Alchemist's Catastrophe

Rembrandt by Andries de Graef

Dutch painting

its emergence and initial period merge to such an extent with the first stages of the development of Flemish painting that the latest art historians consider both for the entire time before late XVI Art. inseparably, under one common name "Dutch school". Both of them, constituting the offspring of the Rhine branch, are dumb. painting, the main representatives of which are Wilhelm of Cologne and Stefan Lochner, consider the van Eyck brothers to be their founders; both have been moving in the same direction for a long time, are animated by the same ideals, pursue the same tasks, develop the same technique, so that the artists of Holland are no different from their Flemish and Brabant brethren. This continues throughout the reign of the country, first by the Burgundian and then by the Austrian house, until a brutal revolution breaks out, ending in the complete triumph of the Golls. people over the Spaniards who oppressed them. From this era, each of the two branches of Dutch art begins to move separately, although sometimes they happen to come into very close contact with each other. G. painting immediately takes on an original, completely national character and quickly reaches a bright and abundant flowering. The reasons for this phenomenon, the like of which can hardly be found throughout the entire history of art, lie in topographical, religious, political and social circumstances. In this “low country” (hol land), consisting of swamps, islands and peninsulas, constantly washed away by the sea and threatened by its raids, the population, as soon as it threw off the foreign yoke, had to create everything anew, starting with physical conditions soil and ending with moral and intellectual conditions, because everything was destroyed by the previous struggle for independence. Thanks to their enterprise, practical sense and persistent work, the Dutch managed to transform swamps into fruitful fields and luxurious pastures, conquer vast expanses of land from the sea, acquire material well-being and external political significance. The achievement of these results was greatly facilitated by the federal-republican form of government established in the country and the wisely implemented principle of freedom of thought and religious beliefs. As if by a miracle, everywhere, in all areas of human labor, ardent activity suddenly began to boil in a new, original, purely folk spirit, among other things in the field of art. Of the branches of the latter, on the soil of Holland, one was lucky mainly in one - painting, which here, in the works of many more or less talented artists who appeared almost simultaneously, took on a very versatile direction and at the same time completely different from the direction of art in other countries. main feature What characterizes these artists is a love for nature, the desire to reproduce it in all its simplicity and truth, without the slightest embellishment, without subsuming it under any conditions of a preconceived ideal. The second distinctive property of Goll. painters are composed of a subtle sense of color and an understanding of what a strong, enchanting impression can be made, in addition to the content of the picture, only by the faithful and powerful transmission of colorful relationships determined in nature by the action of light rays, proximity or range of distances. Among the best representatives of geometric painting, this sense of color and light and shade is developed to such an extent that light, with its countless and varied nuances, plays, one might say, the main role in the picture. actor and imparts high interest to the most insignificant plot, the most inelegant forms and images. Then it should be noted that most Goll. artists do not go on long searches for material for their creativity, but are content with what they find around them, in their native nature and in the life of their people. Typical features of distinguished compatriots, the physiognomy of ordinary Dutchmen and Dutchwomen, the noisy fun of common holidays, peasant feasts, scenes of village life or intimate life townspeople, native dunes, polders and vast plains crossed by canals, herds grazing in rich meadows, huts nestled at the edge of beech or oak groves, villages on the banks of rivers, lakes and groves, cities with their neat houses, drawbridges and high spiers churches and town halls, harbors cluttered with ships, a sky filled with silvery or golden vapors - all this, under the brush of the gall. masters imbued with love for the fatherland and national pride, turns into paintings full of air, light and attractiveness. Even in cases where some of these masters resort to the Bible for topics, ancient history and mythology, then even then, without worrying about maintaining archaeological fidelity, they transfer the action to the environment of the Dutch, surrounding it with a Dutch setting. True, next to the crowded crowd of such patriotic artists there is a phalanx of other painters looking for inspiration outside the borders of their fatherland, in the classical country of art, Italy; however, in their works there are also features that expose their nationality. Finally, as a feature of the goal. painters, one can point to their renunciation of artistic traditions. It would be in vain to look for among them a strict continuity of well-known aesthetic principles and technical rules, not only in the sense of academic style, but also in the sense of the students’ assimilation of the character of their teachers: with the exception, perhaps, of Rembrandt’s students alone, who more or less closely followed in the footsteps of their genius mentor, almost all painters in Holland, as soon as they passed their student years, and sometimes even during these years, began to work in their own way, in accordance with where their individual inclination led them and what direct observation of nature taught them. Therefore, the goal. artists cannot be divided into schools, just as we do with the artists of Italy or Spain; it is difficult even to form strictly defined groups of them, and the very expression " G. painting school", which came into general use, should be understood only in a conditional sense, as denoting a collection of tribal masters, but not an actual school. Meanwhile, in all the main cities of Holland there were organized societies of artists, which, it would seem, should have influenced the communication of their activities of one general direction, however, such societies bore the name. guilds of st. Luke, if they contributed to this, then to a very moderate extent. These were not academies, the custodians of well-known artistic traditions, but free corporations, similar to other craft and industrial guilds, not much different from them in terms of structure and aimed at mutual support of their members, protection of their rights, care for their old age, care for the fate of their widows and orphans. Every local painter who met the requirements of the moral qualifications was admitted to the guild upon preliminary confirmation of his abilities and knowledge or on the basis of the fame he had already acquired; visiting artists were admitted to the guild as temporary members for the duration of their stay in a given city. Those belonging to the guild met to discuss, under the chairmanship of the deans, their common affairs or for the mutual exchange of thoughts; but in these meetings there was nothing that resembled the preaching of a certain artistic direction and that would tend to restrict the originality of any of the members.

The indicated features of G. painting are noticeable even in its early days - at a time when it developed inseparably from the Flemish school. Her vocation, like that of the latter, was then mainly to decorate churches with religious paintings, palaces, town halls and noble houses with portraits of government officials and aristocrats. Unfortunately, the works of primitive Greek painters have reached us only in very limited quantities, since most of them perished in that troubled time when the Reformation devastated Catholic churches, abolished monasteries and abbeys, and incited “icon breakers” (beeldstormers) to destroy picturesque and sculptural sacred images, and the popular uprising destroyed everywhere the portraits of the hated tyrants. We know many of the artists who preceded the revolution only by name; We can judge others only by one or two samples of their work. So, regarding the oldest of the Golls. painters, Albert van Ouwater, there is no positive data, except for the information that he was a contemporary of the van Eycks and worked in Harlem; There are no reliable paintings of him. His student Gertjen van Sint-Jan is known only from two panels of a triptych kept in the Vienna Gallery ("Holy Sepulcher" and "Legend of the Bones of St. John"), which he wrote for the Harlem Cathedral. The fog that shrouds us in the initial era of the G. school begins to dissipate with the appearance on the scene of Dirk Bouts, nicknamed Stuerboat († 1475), originally from Haarlem, but who worked in Leuven and is therefore considered by many to be part of the Flemish school (his best works are two paintings " The Wrongful Trial of Emperor Otto" are in the Brussels Museum), as well as Cornelis Engelbrechtsen (1468-1553), whose main merit is that he was the teacher of the famous Luke of Leiden (1494-1533). This latter, a versatile, hardworking and highly talented artist, knew how, like no one before him, to accurately reproduce everything that caught his eye, and therefore can be considered the real father of the Dutch genre, although he had to paint mainly religious paintings and portraits. In the works of his contemporary Jan Mostaert (circa 1470-1556), the desire for naturalism is combined with a touch of Gothic tradition, the warmth of religious feeling with a concern for external elegance. In addition to these outstanding masters, the following deserve to be mentioned during the initial era of Georgian art: Hieronymus van Aken, nicknamed J. de Bosch (c. 1462-1516), who laid the foundation for satirical everyday painting with his complex, intricate and sometimes extremely strange compositions; Jan Mundain († 1520), famous in Harlem for his depictions of devilry and buffoonery; Pieter Aertsen († 1516), nicknamed for his high growth"Long Peter" (Lange Pier), David Ioris (1501-56), a skilled glass painter, carried away by Anabaptist nonsense and imagining himself as the prophet David and the son of God, Jacob Swarts (1469? - 1535?), Jacob Cornelisen (1480? - later 1533) and his son Dirk Jacobs (two paintings of the latter, depicting rifle societies, are in the Imperial Hermitage).

About half of the 16th table. among Dutch painters there is a desire to get rid of shortcomings Russian art- its gothic angularity and dryness - by studying Italian artists the Renaissance and combining their manner with the best traditions of their own school. This desire is already visible in the works of the aforementioned Mostert; but the main disseminator of the new movement should be considered Jan Schorel (1495-1562), who lived for a long time in Italy and later founded a school in Utrecht, from which came a number of artists infected with the desire to become Dutch Raphaels and Michelangelos. In his footsteps, Maarten van Van, nicknamed Gemskerk (1498-1574), Henryk Goltzius (1558-1616), Peter Montford, nicknamed. Blokhorst (1532-83), Cornelis v. Haarlem (1562-1638) and others belonging to the next period of the Italian school, such as, for example, Abraham Bloemaert (1564-1651), Gerard Gonthorst (1592-1662), went beyond the Alps to become imbued with the perfections of the luminaries of Italian painting, but fell , for the most part, under the influence of representatives of the decline of this painting that was beginning at that time and returned to their homeland as mannerists, imagining that the whole essence of art lies in the exaggeration of muscles, in the pretentiousness of angles and the panache of conventional colors. However, the Italians' passion for painting, which often extended to extremes in the transitional era of Georgia, brought a kind of benefit, since it brought into this painting better, more learned drawing and the ability to manage composition more freely and boldly. Together with the Old Netherlandish tradition and boundless love for nature, Italianism became one of the elements from which the original, highly developed art of the flourishing era was formed. The onset of this era, as we have already said, should be dated to the beginning of the 17th century, when Holland, having won independence, began to live new life. The dramatic transformation of an oppressed and poor country just yesterday into a politically important, comfortable and wealthy union of states was accompanied by an equally dramatic revolution in its art. From all sides, almost at once, they appear in countless numbers. wonderful artists, called to activity by the rise of the national spirit and the need for their work that has developed in society. To the original artistic centers, Haarlem and Leiden, new ones are added - Delft, Utrecht, Dortrecht, The Hague, Amsterdam, etc. Everywhere the old tasks of painting are being developed in a new way under the influence of changing demands and views, and its new branches, the beginnings of which were barely noticeable in the previous period. The Reformation drove religious paintings out of churches; there was no need to decorate palaces and noble chambers with images of ancient gods and heroes, and therefore historical painting, satisfying the tastes of the rich bourgeoisie, discarded idealism and turned to an accurate reproduction of reality: it began to interpret long-past events as the events of the day that took place in Holland, and in especially took up portraiture, perpetuating in it the features of people of that time, either in single figures or in extensive, multi-figure compositions depicting rifle societies (schutterstuke), which played such a prominent role in the struggle for the liberation of the country - the managers of its charitable institutions (regentenstuke) , shop foremen and members of various corporations. If we decided to talk about all the talented portrait painters of the flourishing era of Gaul. art, then just listing their names with an indication of their best works would take many lines; Therefore, we limit ourselves to mentioning only those artists who are especially outstanding from the general ranks. These are: Michiel Mierevelt (1567-1641), his student Paulus Morelse (1571-1638), Thomas de Keyser (1596-1667) Jan van Ravesteyn (1572? - 1657), predecessors of the three greatest portrait painters of Holland - the sorcerer of chiaroscuro Rembrandt van Rijn ( 1606-69), an incomparable draftsman who had an amazing art of modeling figures in light, but somewhat cold in character and color, Bartholomew van der Gelst (1611 or 1612-70) and striking with the fugue of his brush Frans Gols the Elder (1581-1666). Of these, the name of Rembrandt shines especially brightly in history, at first held in high esteem by his contemporaries, then forgotten by them, little appreciated by posterity, and only in the current century elevated, in all fairness, to the level of world genius. In his characteristic artistic personality, everything is concentrated, as if in focus. best qualities G. painting and its influence was reflected in all its types - in portraits, historical paintings, everyday scenes and landscapes. The most famous among Rembrandt's students and followers were: Ferdinand Bol (1616-80), Govert Flinck (1615-60), Gerbrand van den Eckhout (1621-74), Nicholas Mas (1632-93), Art de Gelder (1645-1727 ), Jacob Backer (1608 or 1609-51), Jan Victors (1621-74), Carel Fabricius (c. 1620-54), Salomon and Philips Koning (1609-56, 1619-88), Pieter de Grebber, Willem de Porter († later 1645), Gerard Dou (1613-75) and Samuel van Googstraten (1626-78). In addition to these artists, to complete the list of the best portrait painters and historical painters of the period under review, one should name Jan Lievens (1607-30), Rembrandt’s friend in his studies with P. Lastman, Abraham van Tempel (1622-72) and Pieter Nazon (1612-91), working, apparently, under the influence of V. d. Gelsta, the imitator of Hals Johannes Verspronck (1597-1662), Jan and Jacob de Braev († 1664, † 1697), Cornelis van Zeulen (1594-1664) and Nicholas de Gelta-Stokade (1614-69). Household painting, the first experiments of which appeared in the old Dutch school, found itself in the 17th century. especially fertile soil in Protestant, free, bourgeois, self-satisfied Holland. Small pictures, artlessly representing the customs and life of different classes of local society, seemed enough people more entertaining than large works of serious painting, and on a par with landscapes - more suitable for decorating cozy private homes. A whole horde of artists satisfies the demand for such pictures, without thinking long about the choice of themes for them, but conscientiously reproducing everything that is encountered in reality, showing at the same time love for their family, then good-natured humor, accurately characterizing the depicted positions and faces and refined in the mastery of technology. While some are occupied with common people's life, scenes of peasant happiness and sorrow, drinking bouts in taverns and taverns, gatherings in front of roadside inns, rural holidays, games and skating on the ice of frozen rivers and canals, etc., others take the content for their works from a more elegant circle - they paint graceful ladies in their intimate surroundings, the courtship of dandy gentlemen, housewives giving orders to their maids, salon exercises in music and singing, the revelry of golden youth in pleasure houses, etc. In the long series of artists of the first category, they excel Adrian and Izak v. Ostade (1610-85, 1621-49), Adrian Brouwer (1605 or 1606-38), Jan Stan (about 1626-79), Cornelis Bega (1620-64), Richart Brackenburg (1650-1702), P. v. Lahr, nicknamed Bambocchio in Italy (1590-1658), Cornelis Dusart (1660-1704), Egbert van der Poel (1621-64), Cornelis Drohslot (1586-1666), Egbert v. Gemskerk (1610-80), Henrik Roques, nicknamed Sorg (1621-82), Claes Molenaar (formerly 1630-76), Jan Minse-Molenar (about 1610-68), Cornelis Saftleven (1606-81) and some. etc. Of the equally significant number of painters who reproduced the life of the middle and upper, generally sufficient, class, Gerard Terborch (1617-81), Gerard Dou (1613-75), Gabriel Metsu (1630-67), Peter de Gogh ( 1630-66), Caspar Netscher (1639-84), France c. Miris the Elder (1635-81), Eglon van der Naer (1643-1703), Gottfried Schalcken (1643-1706), Jan van der Meer of Delft (1632-73), Johannes Vercollier (1650-93), Quiring Brekelenkamp (†1668 ). Jacob Ochtervelt († 1670), Dirk Hals (1589-1656), Anthony and Palamedes Palamedes (1601-73, 1607-38), etc. The category of genre painters includes artists who painted scenes of military life, idleness of soldiers in guardhouses, camp sites , cavalry skirmishes and entire battles, dressage horses, as well as falconry and hound hunting scenes akin to battle scenes. Chief Representative This branch of painting is the famous and unusually prolific Philips Wouwerman (1619-68). In addition to him, her brother of this master, Peter (1623-82), Jan Asselein (1610-52), whom we will soon meet among the landscape painters, the aforementioned Palamedes, Jacob Leduc (1600 - later 1660), Henrik Verschuring (1627- 90), Dirk Stop (1610-80), Dirk Mas (1656-1717), etc. For many of these artists, landscape plays as important a role as human figures; but in parallel with them, a mass of painters are working, setting it as their main or exclusive task. In general, the Dutch have an inalienable right to be proud that their fatherland is not only the homeland the latest genre, but also landscape in the sense as it is understood today. In fact, in other countries, e.g. in Italy and France, art had little interest in inanimate nature, did not find in it either a unique life or special beauty: the painter introduced landscape into his paintings only as a side element, as a decoration, among which episodes of human drama or comedy are played out, and therefore subordinated it conditions of the scene, inventing picturesque lines and spots that are beneficial to it, but without copying nature, without being imbued with the impression it inspires. In the same way he “composed” nature in those rare cases when he tried to write purely landscape painting . The Dutch were the first to understand that even in inanimate nature everything breathes life, everything is attractive, everything is capable of evoking thought and exciting the movement of the heart. And this was quite natural, because the Dutch, so to speak, created the nature around them with their own hands, treasured and admired it, like a father treasures and admires his own brainchild. In addition, this nature, despite the modesty of its forms and colors, provided colorists such as the Dutch with abundant material for developing lighting motifs and aerial perspective due to the climatic conditions of the country - its steam-saturated air, softening the outlines of objects, producing a gradation of tones at different plans and covering the distance with a haze of silvery or golden fog, as well as the changeability of the appearance of areas determined by the time of year, hour of day and weather conditions. Among the landscape painters of the flowering period, the Dutch. schools that were interpreters of their domestic nature are especially respected: Jan V. Goyen (1595-1656), who, together with Esaias van de Velde (c. 1590-1630) and Pieter Moleyn the Elder. (1595-1661), considered the founder of the Goll. landscape; then this master's student, Salomon. Ruisdael († 1623), Simon de Vlieger (1601-59), Jan Wijnants (c. 1600 - later 1679), lover of the effects of better lighting Art. d. Nair (1603-77), poetic Jacob v. Ruisdael (1628 or 1629-82), Meinert Gobbema (1638-1709) and Cornelis Dekker († 1678). Among the Dutch there were also many landscape painters who embarked on travels and reproduced motifs of foreign nature, which, however, did not prevent them from maintaining a national character in their painting. Albert V. Everdingen (1621-75) depicted views of Norway; Jan Both (1610-52), Dirk v. Bergen († later 1690) and Jan Lingelbach (1623-74) - Italy; Ian V. d. Mayor the Younger (1656-1705), Hermann Saftleven (1610-85) and Jan Griffir (1656-1720) - Reina; Jan Hackart (1629-99?) - Germany and Switzerland; Cornelis Pulenenburg (1586-1667) and a group of his followers painted landscapes inspired by Italian nature, with ruins of ancient buildings, bathing nymphs and scenes of an imaginary Arcadia. In a special category we can single out masters who in their paintings combined landscapes with images of animals, giving preference to either the first or the second, or treating both parts with equal attention. The most famous among such painters of rural idyll is Paulus Potter (1625-54); Besides him, Adrian should be included here. d. Velde (1635 or 1636-72), Albert Cuyp (1620-91), Abraham Gondius († 1692) and numerous artists who turned for themes preferably or exclusively to Italy, such as: Willem Romain († later 1693), Adam Peinaker (1622-73), Jan-Baptiste Vanix (1621-60), Jan Asselein, Claes Berchem (1620-83), Karel Dujardin (1622-78), Thomas Weick (1616? -77) Frederic de Moucheron (1633 or 1634-86) and others. Closely related to landscape painting is the painting of architectural views, which Dutch artists began to engage in as an independent branch of art only in the half of the 17th century. Some of those who have since worked in this area have been sophisticated in depicting city streets and squares with their buildings; these are, among others, less significant, Johannes Bärestraten (1622-66), Job and Gerrit Werk-Heide (1630-93, 1638-98), Jan v. d. Heyden (1647-1712) and Jacob v. village Yulft (1627-88). Others, among whom the most prominent are Pieter Sanredan († 1666), Dirk v. Delen (1605-71), Emmanuel de Witte (1616 or 1617-92), painted interior views of churches and palaces. The sea was of such importance in the life of Holland that her art could not treat it except with the greatest attention. Many of its artists who dealt with landscapes, genres and even portraits, breaking away from their usual subjects for a while, became marine painters, and if we decided to list all the Dutch painters. schools depicting a calm or raging sea, ships rocking on it, harbors cluttered with ships, naval battles, etc., then we would get a very long list that would include the names of Ya. Goyen, S. de Vlieger, S. and J. Ruisdael, A. Cuyp and others already mentioned in the previous lines. Limiting ourselves to pointing out those for whom painting marine species constituted a specialty we should call Willem V. de Velde the Elder (1611 or 1612-93), his famous son V. v. de Velde the Younger (1633-1707), Ludolf Backhuisen (1631-1708), Jan V. de Cappelle († 1679) and Julius Parcellis († later 1634). Finally, the realistic direction of the Dutch school was the reason that a type of painting was formed and developed in it, which in other schools until then had not been cultivated as a special, independent branch, namely painting of flowers, fruits, vegetables, living creatures, kitchen utensils, tableware etc. - in a word, what is now commonly called “dead nature” (nature morte, Stilleben). In this area between the The most famous artists of the flourishing era were Jan-Davids de Gem (1606-83), his son Cornelis (1631-95), Abraham Mignon (1640-79), Melchior de Gondecoeter (1636-95), Maria Osterwijk (1630-93) , Willem V. Aalst (1626-83), Willem Geda (1594 - later 1678), Willem Kalf (1621 or 1622-93) and Jan Waenix (1640-1719).

The brilliant period of Dutch painting did not last long - only one century. Since the beginning of the 18th century. its decline is coming, not because the Zuiderzee coast ceases to produce innate talents, but because In society, national self-awareness is weakening more and more, the national spirit is evaporating, and the French tastes and views of the pompous era of Louis XIV are taking root. In art, this cultural turn is expressed by the oblivion on the part of artists of those fundamental principles on which the originality of painters of previous generations depended, and an appeal to aesthetic principles, brought from a neighboring country. Instead of a direct relationship to nature, love of what is native and sincerity, the dominance of preconceived theories, convention, and imitation of Poussin, Lebrun, Cl. Lorrain and other luminaries of the French school. The main propagator of this regrettable trend was the Flemish Gerard de Leresse (1641-1711), who settled in Amsterdam, a very capable artist and educated in his time, who had a huge influence on his contemporaries and immediate posterity both with his mannered pseudo-historical paintings and works of his own pen, among which one - " Great book painter" ("t groot schilderboec) - for fifty years served as a code for young artists. The famous Hadrian also contributed to the decline of the school. de Werff (1659-1722), whose sleek painting with cold figures, as if carved from ivory, with a dull, powerless color, once seemed the height of perfection. Among the followers of this artist Henryk v. enjoyed fame as historical painters. Limborg (1680-1758) and Philip V.-Dyck (1669-1729), nicknamed "Little V.-Dyck". Of the other painters of the era in question, endowed with undoubted talent, but infected with the spirit of the times, it should be noted Willem and France v. Miris the Younger (1662-1747, 1689-1763), Nicholas Vercollier (1673-1746), Constantine Netscher (1668-1722), Isaac de Moucheron (1670-1744) and Carel de Maur (1656-1738). Some shine was given to the dying school by Cornelis Troost (1697-1750), primarily a cartoonist, nicknamed Dutch. Gogarth, portrait painter Jan Quincgard (1688-1772), decorative and historical painter Jacob de Wit (1695-1754) and painters of dead nature Jan V. Geysum (1682-1749) and Rachel Reisch (1664-1750).

Foreign influence weighed on Dutch painting until the twenties of the 19th century, having managed to more or less reflect in it the changes that art took in France, starting with the wigmaking of the times of the Sun King and ending with the pseudo-classicism of David. When the style of the latter became obsolete and everywhere in Western Europe, instead of the fascination with the ancient Greeks and Romans, a romantic desire was aroused, mastering both poetry and the figurative arts, the Dutch, like other peoples, turned their gaze to their antiquity, and therefore to their glorious past painting. The desire to give her again the brilliance with which she shone in the 17th century began to animate newest artists and returned them to the principles of the ancient national masters - to a strict observation of nature and an ingenuous, sincere attitude to the tasks at hand. At the same time, they did not try to completely eliminate themselves from foreign influence, but when they went to study in Paris or Dusseldorf and other artistic centers in Germany, they took home only an acquaintance with the successes of modern technology. Thanks to all this, the revived Dutch school again received an original, attractive physiognomy and is moving today along the path leading to further progress. She can easily contrast many of her newest figures with the best painters of the 19th century in other countries. History painting in the strict sense of the word, it is cultivated in it, as in the old days, very moderately and has no outstanding representatives; But in terms of the historical genre, Holland can be proud of several significant recent masters, such as: Jacob Ekgout (1793-1861), Ari Lamme (b. 1812), Peter V. Schendel (1806-70), David Bles (b. 1821), Hermann ten-Cate (1822-1891) and the highly talented Lawrence Alma-Tadema (b. 1836), who deserted to England. In terms of the everyday genre, which was also included in the circle of activity of these artists (with the exception of Alma-Tadema), one can point to a number of excellent painters, headed by Joseph Israels (b. 1824) and Christoffel Bisschop (b. 1828); besides them, Michiel Verseg (1756-1843), Elhanon Vervaer (b. 1826), Teresa Schwarze (b. 1852) and Valli Mus (b. 1857) are worthy of being named. The newest goal is especially rich. painting by landscape painters who worked and work in a variety of ways, sometimes with careful completion, sometimes with the broad technique of the impressionists, but faithful and poetic interpreters of their native nature. These include Andreas Schelfgout (1787-1870), Barent Koekkoek (1803-62), Johannes Wilders (1811-90), Willem Roelofs (b. 1822), Hendrich v. de Sande-Bockhuisen (b. 1826), Anton Mauwe (1838-88), Jacob Maris (b. 1837), Lodewijk Apol (b. 1850) and many others. etc. Direct heirs of Ya. D. Heyden and E. de Witte, painters of promising views appeared, Jan Verheiden (1778-1846), Bartholomews v. Gowe (1790-1888), Salomon Vervaer (1813-76), Cornelis Springer (1817-91), Johannes Bosbohm (1817-91), Johannes Weissenbruch (1822-1880), etc. Among the newest marine painters of Holland, the palm belongs to Jog. Schotel (1787-1838), Ari Plaisir (b. 1809), Hermann Koekkoek (1815-82) and Henrik Mesdag (b. 1831). Finally, Wouters Verschoor (1812-74) and Johann Gas (b. 1832) showed great skill in animal painting.

Wed. Van Eyden u. van der Willigen, "Geschiedenis der vaderlandische schilderkunst, sedert de helft des 18-de eeuw" (4 volumes, 1866) A. Woltman u. K. Woermann, "Geschichte der Malerei" (2nd and 3rd volumes, 1882-1883); Waagen, "Handbuch der deutschen und niderländischen Malerschulen" (1862); Bode, "Studien zur Geschichte der holländischen Malerei" (1883); Havard, "La peinture hollandaise" (1880); E. Fromentin, "Les maîtres d"autrefois. Belgique, Hollande" (1876); A. Bredius, "Die Meisterwerke des Rijksmuseum zu Amsterdam" (1890); P. P. Semenov, "Sketches on History Dutch painting based on its samples located in St. Petersburg." (special supplement to the journal "Vestn. Fine Arts", 1885-90).

A. Somov.

Encyclopedic Dictionary F.A. Brockhaus and I.A. Efron. - St. Petersburg: Brockhaus-Efron. 1890-1907 .

Holland. 17th century The country is experiencing unprecedented prosperity. The so-called "Golden Age". At the end of the 16th century, several provinces of the country achieved independence from Spain.

Now the Protestant Netherlands have gone their own way. And Catholic Flanders (present-day Belgium) under the wing of Spain is its own.

In independent Holland, almost no one needed religious painting. The Protestant Church did not approve of luxury decoration. But this circumstance “played into the hands” of secular painting.

Literally every resident of the new country awakened to love for this type of art. The Dutch wanted to see their own lives in the paintings. And the artists willingly met them halfway.

Never before has the surrounding reality been depicted so much. Ordinary people, ordinary rooms and the most ordinary breakfast of a city dweller.

Realism flourished. Until the 20th century, it will be a worthy competitor to academicism with its nymphs and Greek goddesses.

These artists are called "small" Dutch. Why? The paintings were small in size, because they were created for small houses. Thus, almost all paintings by Jan Vermeer are no more than half a meter in height.

But I like the other version better. Lived and worked in the Netherlands in the 17th century Great master, the “big” Dutchman. And everyone else was “small” in comparison with him.

We are talking, of course, about Rembrandt. Let's start with him.

1. Rembrandt (1606-1669)

Rembrandt experienced a wide range of emotions during his life. Therefore in his early works so much fun and bravado. And there are so many complex feelings - in the later ones.

Here he is young and carefree in the painting “The Prodigal Son in the Tavern.” On his knees is his beloved wife Saskia. He is a popular artist. Orders are pouring in.

But all this will disappear in about 10 years. Saskia will die of consumption. Popularity will disappear like smoke. A large house with a unique collection will be taken away for debts.

But the same Rembrandt will appear who will remain for centuries. The bare feelings of the heroes. Their deepest thoughts.

2. Frans Hals (1583-1666)

Frans Hals is one of the greatest portrait painters of all time. Therefore, I would also classify him as a “big” Dutchman.

In Holland at that time it was customary to order group portraits. This is how many similar works appeared depicting people working together: marksmen of one guild, doctors of one town, managers of a nursing home.

In this genre, Hals stands out the most. After all, most of these portraits looked like a deck of cards. People sit at the table with the same facial expression and just watch. With Hals it was different.

Look at his group portrait “Arrows of the Guild of St. George."

Here you will not find a single repetition in pose or facial expression. At the same time, there is no chaos here. There are many characters, but no one seems superfluous. Thanks to the amazingly correct arrangement of figures.

And even in a single portrait, Hals was superior to many artists. His patterns are natural. People from high society in his paintings are devoid of contrived grandeur, and models from the lower classes do not look humiliated.

And his characters are also very emotional: they smile, laugh, and gesticulate. Like, for example, this “Gypsy” with a sly look.

Hals, like Rembrandt, ended his life in poverty. For the same reason. His realism ran counter to the tastes of his customers. Who wanted their appearance to be embellished. Hals did not accept outright flattery, and thereby signed his own sentence - “Oblivion.”

3. Gerard Terborch (1617-1681)

Terborch was a master everyday genre. Rich and not-so-rich burghers talk leisurely, ladies read letters, and a procuress watches the courtship. Two or three closely spaced figures.

It was this master who developed the canons of the everyday genre. Which would later be borrowed by Jan Vermeer, Pieter de Hooch and many other “small” Dutchmen.

“A Glass of Lemonade” is one of famous works Terborha. It shows another advantage of the artist. Incredibly realistic image of the dress fabric.

Terborch also has unusual works. Which speaks volumes about his desire to go beyond customer requirements.

His "The Grinder" shows the life of the poorest people in Holland. We are used to seeing cozy courtyards and clean rooms in the paintings of the “small” Dutch. But Terborch dared to show unsightly Holland.

As you understand, such work was not in demand. And they are a rare occurrence even among Terborch.

4. Jan Vermeer (1632-1675)

It is not known for certain what Jan Vermeer looked like. It is only obvious that in the painting “The Artist’s Workshop” he depicted himself. The truth from the back.

It is therefore surprising that a new fact from the master’s life has recently become known. It is connected with his masterpiece “Delft Street”.

It turned out that Vermeer spent his childhood on this street. The house pictured belonged to his aunt. She raised her five children there. Perhaps she is sitting on the doorstep sewing while her two children play on the sidewalk. Vermeer himself lived in the house opposite.

But more often he depicted the interior of these houses and their inhabitants. It would seem that the plots of the paintings are very simple. Here is a pretty lady, a wealthy city dweller, checking the operation of her scales.

Why did Vermeer stand out among thousands of other “small” Dutchmen?

He was an unsurpassed master of light. In the painting “Woman with Scales” the light softly envelops the heroine’s face, fabrics and walls. Giving the image an unknown spirituality.

And the compositions of Vermeer’s paintings are carefully verified. You won't find a single unnecessary detail. It is enough to remove one of them, the picture will “fall apart”, and the magic will go away.

All this was not easy for Vermeer. Such amazing quality required painstaking work. Only 2-3 paintings per year. As a result, the inability to feed the family. Vermeer also worked as an art dealer, selling works by other artists.

5. Pieter de Hooch (1629-1884)

Hoch is often compared to Vermeer. They worked at the same time, there was even a period in the same city. And in one genre - everyday. In Hoch we also see one or two figures in cozy Dutch courtyards or rooms.

Open doors and the windows make the space of his paintings multi-layered and entertaining. And the figures fit into this space very harmoniously. As, for example, in his painting “Maid with a Girl in the Courtyard.”

Pieter de Hooch. A maid with a girl in the courtyard. 1658 London National Gallery

Until the 20th century, Hoch was highly valued. But few people noticed the small works of his competitor Vermeer.

But in the 20th century everything changed. Hoch's glory faded. However, it is difficult not to recognize his achievements in painting. Few people could so competently combine the environment and people.

Please note that in a modest house on the canvas “Card Players” there is a painting hanging in an expensive frame.

This once again shows how popular painting was among ordinary Dutch people. Paintings decorated every home: the house of a rich burgher, a modest city dweller, and even a peasant.

6. Jan Steen (1626-1679)

Jan Steen is perhaps the most cheerful “little” Dutchman. But loving moral teaching. He often depicted taverns or poor houses in which vice existed.

Its main characters are revelers and ladies of easy virtue. He wanted to entertain the viewer, but latently warn him against a vicious life.

Sten also has quieter works. Like, for example, “Morning Toilet.” But here too the artist surprises the viewer with too revealing details. There are traces of stocking elastic, and not an empty chamber pot. And somehow it’s not at all appropriate for the dog to be lying right on the pillow.

But despite all the frivolity, Sten’s color schemes are very professional. In this he was superior to many “little Dutchmen”. Look how perfectly the red stocking goes with the blue jacket and bright beige rug.

7. Jacobs Van Ruisdael (1629-1882)

The history of any country finds its expression in art, and this pattern is especially indicative in the example of painting. In particular, using the example of painting from the Netherlands, which experienced a revolution that greatly influenced the future fate of the once united state. As a result of the revolution in the 17th century The Netherlands was divided into two parts: to Holland and Flanders (the territory of modern Belgium), which remained under Spanish rule.

Historical their development took different paths, as well as cultural. This means that division once became possible general concept Dutch painting into Dutch and Flemish.

Dutch painting

The culture of Holland in the 17th century is a living embodiment of the triumph of the state that gained independence. Artists, inspired by the taste of freedom, filled this time with the pathos of social and spiritual renewal and for the first time paid close attention to the environment around them - nature, human image. Dutch genre artists are inspired everyday life, small everyday episodes, which becomes one of the characteristic features of Dutch realism.

In addition, the main customers of art were not only representatives of the elite, but also merchants and peasants. This partly influenced the development of painting as an interior item, and also contributed to the growth of public interest in themes of everyday life.

Dutch art of the 17th century is famous branched genre system of painting.

For example, among the landscape painters there were marine painters, artists depicting views of flat areas or forest thickets, there were also masters of winter landscapes or paintings with moonlight; there were genre painters who specialized in figures of peasants, burghers, and scenes of domestic life; there were masters of various types of still lifes - “breakfasts”, “desserts”, “benches”.

The painter's strict concentration on one subsystem of the genre contributed to the detailing and improvement of all Dutch painting as a whole.

The 17th century is truly golden era of Dutch painting.

Artistic Features

Light and subtle sense of color play a major role in the paintings of Dutch artists.

For example, as in the pictures Rembrandt - an artist who became the personification of an entire era of Dutch painting. Rembrandt was not afraid realistic details, contrary to the canons of depicting reality, and therefore among contemporaries became known as a “painter of ugliness.”

Rembrandt was the first to attach special importance play of light which allowed him to invent something different from the rest writing style. According to Andre Felibien,“... often he just applied broad brush strokes and applied thick layers of paint one after another, without giving himself the trouble to make the transitions from one tones to others smoother and softer.”

"Return of the Prodigal Son", 1666-1669

Jan Vermeer(Vermeer/Vermeer of Delft ) – painter of harmony and clarity of vision of the world. Known for the strength of its figurative solutions and the tendency to depict poeticized atmosphere of everyday life, he paid special attention colorful nuance, which made it possible to convey the character of the light-air space.

"Young woman with a jug of water", 1660-1662

Jacob van Ruisdael wrote monumental landscapes in cool colors, which embodied his subtle sense of the dramatic and even gloomy variability of the world.

"Jewish Cemetery", 1657

Albert Cape became famous for his unusual look at composition landscape - it is given to him, as a rule, from a low point of view, which allows you to convey the vastness of the space being viewed.

"Cows on the River Bank", 1650

Frans Hals (Hals/Hals) famous outstanding genre and group portraits, attracting with their specificity.

"Gypsy", 1628-1630

Flemish painting

In Flanders the cultural background was noticeably different from the Dutch. Feudal nobility and the Catholic Church still played a major role in the life of the country, being the main customers of art . Therefore, the main types of works of Flemish painting remained paintings for castles, for the city houses of the rich, and majestic altar images for Catholic churches. Scenes of ancient mythology and biblical scenes, huge still lifes, portraits of eminent customers, images of magnificent festivities - the main genres of art in Flanders in the 17th century.

Flemish Baroque art (cheerful, materially sensual, lush in an abundance of forms) was formed from the features of Italian and Spanish Renaissance in the refraction of its national color, which especially manifested itself in painting.

Flemish liveliness is different monumental forms, dynamic rhythm and triumph of decorative style. This was especially evident in creativity Peter Paul Rubens, who became the central figure of Flemish painting.

His style is characterized by lush, bright images large heavy figures in rapid motion. Rubens is characterized by warm, rich colors, sharp contrasts of light and shadow, and a general spirit of victorious celebration. Eugene Delacroix said:

“His main quality, if preferred to many others, - this is a piercing spirit, that is, a piercing life; without this no artist can be great... Titian and Paolo Veronese They seem terribly meek next to him.”

Everything inherent in his brush became the common features of the whole school.

"Union of Earth and Water", 1618

Art Jacob Jordaens attracts cheerfulness, monumentality, but at the same time with sincere spontaneity - Jordaens’ love for the image rich feasts(the repeated repetition of the plot of “The Bean King” is proof of this. By the way, anyone who found a baked bean in their piece of pie was elected the Bean King at feasts) and the heroes of Christian legends as healthy Flemings embodies the spirit of the culture of Flanders in the 17th century.

"Feast of the Bean King", 1655

Anthony Van Dyck- a portrait painter who created a type of aristocratic portrait, filled with the finest psychologism, expressed in attention to the dynamics of the silhouette and the general expressiveness of the types.

"Portrait of Charles I hunting", 1635

Frans Snyders known for depicting the sensual nature of things, represented by the colorfulness and monumentality of decorative still lifes and animal paintings.

"Fruit Shop", 1620

Jan Brueghel the Younger- grandson of the artist Pieter Bruegel the Elder, remembered for his skillful mixture of landscape and everyday painting, landscape and allegorical mythological subjects, as well as his talented rendering of the panorama effect due to the high position of the horizon.

"Flora against a Landscape", 1600-1610

Main differences between Dutch and Flemish painting

1. In Holland becomes the main customer of art worker stratum of the population, in Flanders - the royal court and nobility.
2. Plots. Different customers ask for different things. Ordinary people interested in paintings depicting everyday life around us, among the nobility expectedly in demand ancient and biblical scenes, a demonstration of luxury.
3. Manner of writing. Characteristic A subtle sense of chiaroscuro becomes a feature of Dutch painting. From now on, this is the main tool that allows us to refine the image of an unsightly reality. In Flemish painting, the central position is occupied by means characteristic of the Baroque artistic expression — splendor of form, brilliant color, abundance and luxury.

The end of the era of Dutch and Flemish painting can be called similar - under the influence of French tastes and views, both Dutch and Flemish national consciousness gradually weakens, and therefore the concept of Flemish and Dutch painting becomes a historical past.

The events of the 17th century in Holland and Flanders gave the world outstanding authors and a fresh look at the general development of trends in world painting.

Sources:

1. Small history of art. Western European Art XVII.

2. Flemish and Dutch art of the 17th century. Like two poles of the worldview of the day // banauka.ru/6067.html.

3. The era of Renaissance art in the Netherlands // http://m.smallbay.ru/article/later_renaiss_niderland.html.